![]() |
only in the UK #ShariahControlledZones
|
Jamaal? I never knew brassmonkey had a neckbeard.
|
Is that even legal?!?! What are the Sharia cops gonna do, kill people for drinking alcohol, as Sharia law dictates?
Sharia is RELIGIOUS law and as such SHOULD not be tolerated in a free and democratic society, as it strongly limits people's freedom of choice. Want Sharia law? Move the fuck out, I bet ISIS will welcome you with open arms in areas they control. BTW, the bearded ginger pictured in the article is a notorious extremist. Native Brit who converted to Islam and is an ex-con. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted on June 29, 2013 by Baron Bodissey Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll, the leaders of the English Defence League, were arrested today in Tower Hamlets during their walk to Woolwich. Their crime? Entering a shariah-controlled area of London, where they were considered persona non grata by the Muslim inhabitants, who were expected to respond with violence. There is now at least one official Islamic no-go zone in Britain. Presumably there are numerous others — in Birmingham, Bradford, Dewsbury, and all those other places where Muslims have claimed ownership of “their” areas. The Metropolitan police have now taken on the responsibility of enforcing the borders of these shariah-controlled zones, applying the rules laid down by the Islamic inhabitants: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wow Brits, grow some balls and stop this shit before it spreads. Religious law zones?
|
When was this published?..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or other sins, like teaching evolution in American schools? Four US states considering laws that challenge teaching of evolution | World news | The Guardian |
Quote:
Yes, Britain needs to grow a pair and I really thought it was going to happen after poor Lee Rigsby but it didn't :( sadly if that didn't wake us up then nothing will. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Truly frightening. They're pushing to limit our freedoms and erase our democracy. Why are we allowing this religion? Having watched these I actually agree with Dubya's "they hate our freedom". Something I thought he had just pulled out of his ass at the time, as propaganda rhetoric. |
Quote:
Point was, that there are also other religious stuff than shariah. Although sharia is more scary, at least from my westerner, or whatever perspective. |
Quote:
To suddenly have a harsh new broad religious standard set would be something I couldn't put up with. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Currently more or less real scenario: black ghettos. You show your poor white ass there and you will get into trouble. How is this that much different from some shariah ghetto? Option two, no ghettos. Bunch of shariah guys tries to force you to do/ not to do something and you start a gun battle with them, and maybe invite your neighbours too. Somehow I don't see very happy ending with this scenario either. Best option: not having shariah guys. Second best option: letting police and army to do their job, while you can play shooting games with Xbox. |
Quote:
|
No one here seems to get the point of these Shariah councils, and the enforcement thugs in those videos certainly don't.
Take a breath and please take a few moments to read below with an open mind... :) Shariah courts were set up by the authorities in the UK for parties who both want to settle their differences under Islamic law rather than UK law, which is essentially Roman law with different attitudes to marriage, divorce, will & probate etc Shariah courts don't deal with crime, fraud etc; they're essentially an Islamic alternative to our UK Family courts. These courts are definitely not about people imposing their value systems on alcohol, dress etc on other people and somehow, accidentally or not, these thugs have been labelled as imposing the wishes are are representatives of Shariah courts... which they definitely are not! If people here really believe in freedom of speech, then they should allow parties who want to settle their differences under Shariah law to do so. Thank you for reading! |
|
Getting it right :thumbsup
|
nuke attack, before its too late :)
|
Quote:
Plus anyone reading this thread should take anything written in The Sun & The Daily Mail with a pinch of salt, they are UK tabloid papers who appeal to morons who have zero capacity to think for themselves. |
Addictive & Probably Carcinogenic: Scientist Reveals Dangers Of Daily Mail
Fucking hilarious! :1orglaugh While many view the Daily Mail as a harmless, recreational newspaper, a newly published study definitively absolutely 100% proves it is actually highly addictive, causes mental judgement problems and damages health http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-620/h--...b-620x372.jpeg While viewed by many as a harmless newspaper read by people who just want to relax and unwind ? or perhaps do some recreational experimentation with different ideologies ? a new study has provided unquestionable proof that the notorious newspaper actually inflicts considerable damage on all those who read it, link to it, or even so much as look directly at it. The detailed study looked at reports of the effects of reading the Daily Mail from the last 20 years. To clarify, it wasn?t a ?20-year study?; who would make that sort of mistake? You might see those nostalgia shows like I love the 80s, but you don?t call them a ?decade-long TV show?. That would be misleading. It would appear to be that you?re ridiculously exaggerating something for your own ends. But the study, conducted by Professor Ineptias of The Department for Hysterical Analysis (University of Hyperbole, Hull), reveals that the Daily Mail has many serious consequences for those reading it. Some of the more devastating are detailed below. Dependency http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-620/h--...c-620x372.jpeg Professor Ineptias revealed a strong tendency for Daily Mail readers to become dependent on it, struggling to go for more than a day without a ?fix?. ?Exposure to the exaggerated, emotive language can be compelling for the casual reader, but pretty soon this takes hold. You become caught up in the exaggerated claims and then you start to show confirmation bias, looking for more things that echo your own opinions and views in a similarly intense way, hence you need to read more Daily Mail.? The long term effects of this dependency are uncertain, but animal studies suggest they could be very dangerous. An experiment where rats had their cages lined with the Daily Mail for a month showed that the animals developed very concerning behaviours. ?They became incredibly hostile and demanding. You?d put them in a maze and whereas they?d normally go and explore, the Daily Mail rats would just look at you angrily, wondering what?s in it for them,? one researcher reported. ?And the rats we used for the study were British-bred, white rats. I accidentally put a cage of foreign rats in the room with them once, they almost tore the place apart. Several of them were physically sick. And rats can?t even vomit!? There have been many different approaches to treating Daily Mail addiction, such as substituting with milder stimulants like the Express or Telegraph (often supplied via a patch), but these have only limited effectiveness. The Daily Mail has also caused dependence in those who hate it, with people constantly linking to it due to a sense of outrage, a very rare example of ?passive dependence?. Development Of Further Disorders Several investigations revealed that those who grow dependent on the Daily Mail often end up unsatisfied with just reading it and feel compelled to contribute with extreme or bizarre comments. But this engagement with like-minded dependents can lead to increased extremism via group polarisation, resulting in ridiculous right-wing behaviour like burning crosses in your garden, or voting for Ukip. ?Those who read the Daily Mail often do so because they are already angry or unhappy with their lot. The constant vitriol aimed at those who are more vulnerable offers a form of displacement, a sort of defence mechanism where those with problems can take them out on others,? Professor Ineptas explained. Prolonged exposure to the Daily Mail can also produce chronic paranoia, suspicion, anger and belief in conspiracies, like how a secret organisation of homosexuals and feminists is going to steal your childhood home and turn it into a luxurious taxpayer-funded refuge for drug-addled benefits claimants who spend all day knitting Union Jacks purely so they can burn them in front of children. Or something. Educational Deficits Reading the Daily Mail has been shown to have a seriously damaging effect on people?s ability to learn new information that isn?t conveyed via hyperbole or exaggeration, or doesn?t put down another group of people in some way. But more alarming is that repeated, prolonged exposure to the Daily Mail seemingly causes degradation of language skills. Even a brief read of any comment section on the site shows that grammar and punctuation are distorted, and some commenters have seemingly lost the knowledge of HOW TO TURN THE CAPS LOCK OFF. That such simple inherent things can be lost implies that the damage the Daily Mail does is at a fundamental level and deeply entrenched. Driving Professor Ineptias discovered a clear link between reading the Daily Mail and traffic accidents. ?Basically, Daily Mail readers have a persistent habit of veering to the right. And this isn?t safe when you?re behind the wheel of a vehicle.? Daily Mail reading supposedly causes a large number of traffic accidents. One study looked into police reports. Officers who tended to Daily Mail readers who had caused a crash reported receiving a stream of abuse about who pays their wages and claims that the rules about driving on the left are just a ?liberal conspiracy?. There was often something about feminists too, but not in any coherent form. Health Dangers The scaremongering used by the Daily Mail can be very dangerous, leading to prolonged stress and anxiety. These have many known health consequences, but addicts tend to suffer more than most because treatment can be obtained via the NHS, but the NHS is largely staffed by immigrants, so Daily Mail readers tend to stay away. On top of this, the Daily Mail often reports that innocuous things cause cancer. But the one link between all of these things is that they are in the Daily Mail. Professor Ineptias argues that this means the Daily Mail itself is a carcinogen. ?What if reading the Daily Mail actually means you?re running your hands all over a vitriolic lump of angry cancer? You might as well put plutonium on your cornflakes! Or buy some asbestos pyjamas. Why don?t you just do that, eh? You make me sick you disgusting liberal. We?d all be better off without the multicultural hellhole you?ve turned this country into. Thatcher would be turning in her grave if she could see what the bloody bLIARites have done. WE MUST TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK!? Professor Ineptias was later found to have been exposed to excessive levels of Daily Mail having failed to observe proper containment procedures during his studies. Dean Burnett would say it?s obvious this article is a joke, but that?s never stopped the Daily Mail from taking it seriously before. |
Quote:
|
reality: a few guys who have an imaginary friend in the sky, stick up some "shariah law" bullshit posters and some broke ass journalist, who is in the business of selling news and not actually reporting the truth, makes $$ on it :1orglaugh
reality 2: we had those same shariah guys in our country, we beat the shit out of them because there were only ever a handful of them, they moved high in to the bosnian mountains, and from time to time, drunk christians go up there and beat the shit out of them for fun... just grow some balls and stop being insecure bitches about everything... |
Just like anyone reading an anti-American gun thread at gfy should read with a grain of salt.
|
Quote:
About UK Sharia courts: |
Quote:
We're not anti US, nor anti guns? At no point was the thread pointing to anti US guns. We found it amusing when we read it on twitter, noticing the display of purchasing an item before 8 am had different said rules to that after :2 cents: |
Quote:
TV show made by british state tv, the BBC,paid by paxpayers money : http://i.imgur.com/dbseJ1o.jpg |
Hey, why just don't send them to Bosnia or Kosovo, UK already helped a lot to create those Muslim states in the middle of the Europe. Once they start killing around again, you can always blame Serbs,and bomb them again. It worked before, right?
|
Quote:
Now I don't know how representative they are of Bosnian Muslims as a whole. But if you are to believe them, then they're very representative. Short of a small bunch of more radical believers, like crucifissio said. Yet those are nowhere near as radical as these UK ones, according to my neighbors. |
btw jamaal is sexy beast, i bet he can get any girl he want, and it started to pissing him off, so he decided to convert ... way to go jamaal, lets show the western world what it deserve! :thumbsup
|
Quote:
as for your country and culture, I must say that 10% of the british population are what I strived to become in life: a true gentleman...you will not find more eloquent and well mannered people than the british...the true british not the fish and chip football hooligan...I went to private schools and admired the way true british gentleman spoke with good style and a vocabulary that is second to none...dressing up in 3 piece suits and writing with an ink pen and learning table manners for kids starting 7 years old...this is what I call positive brain wash...making kids in to gentlemen... the problem was the other 90% of brits I met are pure white trash...your culture was gone long before the muslims came...its a shame, I miss my days in london, I felt like I was part of something really great and I am sad that it is dying away... |
Quote:
Meanwhile,spend 8 minutes one of older SKY news reports: |
Quote:
and to be honest: i expect people to live under the laws of the country they live in. |
Quote:
If we we're in Dubai, we would live by the rules, cover over & no drinking. We wouldn't expect to make the rules in ones country. It's just wrong to bring another law into a country :2 cents: |
Quote:
It doesn't take more than a cursory glance through gfy threads to see the anti-american gun culture threads that many gfyers buy into. |
Quote:
that's because no one here is talking about councils, this is about sharia controlled zones. |
Quote:
what part of london is controlled by shariah law? seriously? :1orglaugh |
Quote:
:1orglaugh gofuckyourself dumfuck. |
Quote:
this took ~.00000000000000000000000000000001 seconds to find Sharia patrols, also referred to as Muslim patrols or Modesty patrols, involving a group or several groups of young radical Muslim men, members of an organisation self-named the Shariah Project,[1] have patrolled streets in East London since at least early 2013. Early that year, videos of their activities, filmed by members of the patrol, were uploaded online:[2] these showed hooded members of the patrol confronting passers-by and demanding that they conform to Sharia law.[3] They targeted prostitutes, people drinking alcohol, couples who were holding hands, women whom they considered to be dressed immodestly, and harassed others whom they perceived as being gay.[4][5][6] Five men were arrested in January 2013 as part of an investigation into the gang,[7][8] and three were given jail sentences on 6 December 2013.[9] gofuckyourself. |
Quote:
Quote:
As said, we certainly meant no hard to american folk nor guns, just the mere fact of the shops ad. All is good dyna mo :thumbsup |
Quote:
I will never reach the level of sophistication my teachers had. The way they formed sentences and used words in perfect style and form. The level of culture goes way beyond your comprehension and I will not try to explain colour to a blind person. You will just have to take my word for it, when I say that I saw a beautiful thing :1orglaugh as for your article, it is one isolated incident where a few backward immigrants with a troubled past came across backward white people and, somehow, this all made news... my question again: what part of London is controlled by shairah law? Let me define "controlled": it does not mean a few rubes got arrested whilst badgering people on the street and the sun had a field day... you have to give an exact location, for example: kensigton and I will prove that that particular part you named is in fact not under "shariah law" you either have a precise answer or you do not know what you are talking about :2 cents: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc