myfreecams model has a kid on cam
 

model doing cam work from a public library has a kid on cam?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8ZNW6rIQAATdnt.jpg

oops?

Oh Jeez. What a stupid person if that's true.

I had to fire someone today because their kid picked up the phone. These women are crazy.

there is no nudity or dirty talk right? you should see the stories b4 cams(people had their kids near having sex for cash) :2 cents::2 cents: stop trying to pass judgement on a struggling parent. would you rather her abandon her child to the streets? cause if she goes to jail who knows if that's the kids only family :helpme

LOL Give me a break. Struggling parent or not, if a girl is going to get on an ADULT site and do some ADULT things, she needs to be in a private, locked room while her kids baby sat in another room. Forgetting any legal issues for a second, the brain-damage she could cause her kids if they caught her would be terrible. BAD PARENT.

man I thought she gave birth on cam from your title :1orglaugh was thinking of what a desperate place MFC has become earlier today LOL

Looks like a public place.

That's the most stupid thing I ever heard.

Report it to them directly and have the thread deleted. :2cents

I would tip for that.

You'll have to excuse monkey's logic. To him, this is a good mother putting food on the table.

as long as the kid is not naked, I don't think it's illegal.

Bingo!
Tons of models are now doing the public shows where they are in a library, in a car or at the office. Surfers seem to like that shit much more than the bedrooms.

I'm sure it was just some little kid walking by wondering what she was doing. I can see the fun in going to the public library and being naughty, but do it in a corner where kids can't walk behind you.

Stupid.

Really, you cannot control the environment in a public place, so public places that cannot be controlled should not be used for settings on adult sex oriented websites.

There is no unlawful activity exhibited but it's just not in its proper context. If you are in a public place you have no expectation of privacy. I understand the voyeur concept but a library can be simulated for the desired arousal.

There is a time and place but I don't see the outrage here. Personally, I would just suspend the model for 48 hours with a warning.

same here lol

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh God you're an idiot.

public place, accident, stupid, illegal, *shrugs*

put your coke bottle glasses on! looks like a library. wait you've probably never visited one. op that's most likely a public computer. so yeah kids there. i once reported a bum :helpme he was watching a blowjob scene in a library with kids(laughing) no older than 10. i knocked him out of the chair and turned it off.

I thought the same thing.

Money minded :Oh crap

It's not professional :2 cents:


I think this should be a time for cam studios to make the adult business more professional. quality cams, less girls trying to make a few bucks from just having a bit of a laugh on cam. I work hard to make sure my viewers get what they want & in proper surroundings :thumbsup

douch, shit happens

Im not talking about running voyeur show at public library dumbass. Im talking about childhood memories and excuses for having bad mother and no-one else to take care of you.
Good bum story tough guy. Did you pistol whip him the gangsta style?

headline throws people off a touch

Odd that the library doesn't block the site, isn't it? Net Nanny or whatever? I would think even the admin/models areas would be on the Adult/Block list. Even if she brought her own laptop, she'd probably still log in through the library's network.

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

gun was in the car. the comps now have an adult filter on them. he was arrested thanx to me. some single mothers cannot afford to pay the high price of childcare.

wonder how many gfy poster click thread hoping kid was model

lol obviously the kid discovered her with her tits out as she was camming from her laptop. don't worry it appears to be a cam girl scandal and they are tweeting the screens to bill o'reilly and nancy grace as we speak.

:error:error:error:error

I wonder if DOJ would agree with your decision?

I am legitimately wondering. How would they handle that? I'd think you have to ban the model for good to cover your own ass.

It's her laptop and she's using a brand new invention called a 'VPN'. You can google it but it's so new you won't find many results.

You're trying to sound like a smart ass, but the reality is a lot of librarians do not believe in censorship, including on the internet. There are many library systems that do not have any type of filtering software.

We are a Dutch Corporation with offices in Rotterdam, Marseilles, and Bucharest so that is immaterial. INTERPOL and Dutch Law would apply.

From the appearance of that screenshot both the woman and the child were fully dressed and nothing sexual was going on. I believe in using some common sense and not to overreact hysterically. If the camgirl was part nude and flashing a child she should be banned as that is a serious criminal act.

Broadcasting from a public place is misdemeanor trespass so it is a local ordinance misdemeanor crime like spitting in the street or taking a piss in an alley -- and I am sure no one here has ever done that ...

I have no knowledge of that child in the library being more that just a passerby observer to an inconsiderate public exhibition, one in violation of that library's rules I am certain of. One of the problems that I have seen on some of the freemium token based camsites is just this but on rare occasions I would add.

For the record, our company policy would require that model to be disciplined somehow -- I don't make those decisions that is the responsibility of others. I don't set model policy and rarely advise modifying or appending it. It's an endless task these days. So, there is my CYA.

She seems little more that guilty of being stupid. Hence, my initial reaction of a 48 hr suspension on a first offense -- It's not a hanging offense ...

If the broadcast from a public place is a written termination offense in the website's model rules -- there is no discussion.

I should add that statement. Something to think about ...

I hope they ban her for life !

On this and Apple products being superior I'm with ya. :thumbsup
Electric car deal you're on your own. :1orglaugh

i agree. there's no way youd let your kid be exposed to any form of adult industry stuffs.

there's video of her showing her tits while kids are running around..

dont know if i should post it here or not, not to sure how the rules play with that

Thats crazy !

Kinda small study (yet), but still.

"Lajeunesse found most boys seek out pornographic material by the age of 10, when they are most sexually curious. However, they quickly discard what they don't like and find offensive."

"Lajeunesse refutes the perverse effect often attributed to pornography. "Aggressors don't need pornography to be violent and addicts can be addicted to drugs, alcohol, gaming and asocial cases are pathological. If pornography had the impact that many claim it has, you would just have to show heterosexual films to a homosexual to change his sexual orientation.""

Are the effects of pornography negligible? -- ScienceDaily

So, probably you just assaulted someone for no good reason. Hobos have the same rights than you.

That is another story.

And do not post it here, forward that to the persons responsible at that cam site.

I was a single mother and never did I have my kids in my room with me while I was starting or working my business.

I worked at NIGHT when they were SLEEPING.

There is no excuse to be around children when you're "working" an adult job.

Oh the horror, the horror that kids might see a pair of breasts.

Calm the fuck down, the camgirls that do shows in libraries (hint: a ton of them do it nowadays) are very discreet and no one around them knows what they're doing.

Apparently that little girl was curious enough to peek at her computer, so I'm going to venture to say not completely discreet. :2 cents:

Or the kid walked up to her to ask where a certain book was. The camgirl is looking at her live feed and can see what's happening behind her, she can abort the operation before anyone gets too close to figure out what she's doing.

Most likely what happened there. But as usual we have brassmonkey going into "she maybe a single mother and cant afford daycare for her child" bullshit

"Go into labour 20000 tokens! come on guys not much left!"

So you think it's perfectly okay that unknowing parents can have their children walking around on webcam behind someone on an adult website?

As a parent I would feel pretty violated if I took my little girl to the library and she was in the background of an adult website. I would probably sue the balls off of the cam company if they had something to sue for.

You can not block out a childs face behind her in real time.

Of course !! It's obvious that she is a struggling mum who needs to go to the library as she can't offer Internet at home :disgust

Silly girl, she should be banned :stop

Library camming is apparently the hottest thing right now.

Yes, I know the manager of one of those library top models I know for sure made $60,000 I don't remember if a month or per period, had 100's in group at same time + tips.