Racist Gets Knocked The Fuck Out
 

This drunk white guy gets his ass beat for talking shit.
White Racist Gets Knocked Out By Black Guy In South Africa - YouTube

I miss apartheid. :(

About 50 people on average are murdered in South-Africa per day, of which at least 20 of them are whites(95+ % black on white murder rate).
Funny liberal shithead have a nerve to cry about "muh white be raysiss"

The Gruesome Reality of Racist South Africa | FrontPage Magazine

and how do we know that the white guy wasn't responding to some provocation from the other guys before the video started rolling?

Who gives a shit how many whites black South Africans kill. They were treated as being less than human and killed for any random reason, for a very long time. Obviously, they are going to act like this for a very long time.

You care now? Why wait so long?

http://s3.reutersmedia.net/resources...=LYNXMPEB0T0CK


South Africa's 'Prime Evil' apartheid killer freed on parole | Reuters

.

I know many people from SA...no one has anything nice to say about it :2 cents:

A great day for Brass Monkey!

So that means live in the past? OK Kanye...

you know I love you

boring video.

Well... I'll tell you what little I've seen. I grew up in Alaska. My father was a brown bear guide. Alaskan brown bear for most of my life if not all, has been the most expensive animal to hunt. So, of course there were many über wealthy and famous people coming each summer.

One guy I met one summer was a German guy with a lot of real estate in South Africa. I don't remember who he was, I remember his money was old money. I remember his pictures and him claiming to own the largest log house in the world at the time, which looked like a mid sized ski resort. To someone surrounded by log homes In a state that is full of them, that was astounding. He was so impressed by my friend and my ability to endure great hardship, hole for days, live off the land, our familiarity with weapons etc etc etc that he offered us a job.

He offered us a lot of money.

This job was to do two things.

1) kill poachers on his land
2) kill any black person on his land

He bluntly told us to make a list of weapons and supplies..., anything we wanted and it would be waitng for us.

This was a time as anyone over 40 will remember that African elephants, rhinos and other similar animals were being hunted to extinction just for their ivory or horns. So frankly, I had little sympathy for the poachers.

As I asked questions things took a very dark turn.

I was concerned about how you'd discern between a poacher or just some hiker etc etc etc etc and how you'd know you were in the right to shoot someone and he calmly examined that any black guy on his land without written permission could be shot with no consequences. So if they were black, it was irrelevant. Shoot them anyway.

This began my interest in apartheid, though it ended I believe, the next year. Was everything he said true? It didn't take too much research to realize it was 100% plausible. It was hard for me to imagine laws that regarded people as lower than stray dogs... as sub human. But that's basically what it was.

There is no comparison in the US. Blacks, through the Civil
Rights movement were still the minority. They didn't control the government, make the laws, police the streets and so on. If someone came to the US and took your land, killed your families and treated you like an animal for a generation or two, raping and killing your people, your friends, your family?.. you honestly think all will be forgiven simply because the law changed? Of course not. African nations, follow the Middle East as some of the most unstable fuck story's on the planet. It's going to take many generations for them to get it together.

I'm not saying it's ok for him to be attacked (though he also looked like the belligerent and deserving of it). I'm saying both sides have been killing and raping each other for a century or more and that's a factor as it pertains to motivation, hostility and aggression towards on another.

sounds like the native american's story.

Or every story of every civilization that ever existed for any significant period of time in the history of the world. The difference is that South African blacks (you know, the ones who historically sold your ancestors into slavery) were alive for apartheid and it's direct effects.

Sure its more recent. However there are plenty of native americans who are still alive who were taken from their families put into 'schools' and abused sexually and physically. i understand what you are getting at but we shouldn't be dismissing the behavior as acceptable due their prior treatment.

I explicitly stated that I wasn't saying it was ok. I was saying it's understandable. South Africa fell into complete chaos for decades and Johannesburg has been one of the most dangerous cities on the planet for ages. Some Idiot gets smacked and a foot on his throat... big picture... a non event.

That's a lame way to say that blacks deserved what they got because some blacks helped the slave traders.

:2 cents:

they WERE the slave traders. the whites brought the slaves from them.

Go buy some females to rape and tell me about the horrible pimp.

:helpme

Are you kidding me? Cape Town is supposed to be one of the most beautiful city in the world!!!

what's the matter, Truth hurts?

guy was shit faced drunk :2 cents::2 cents:

maybe, maybe not EVERYONE I have met from SA tells me the place is a violent shit hole :2 cents:

A black guy kicked a drunk guy in the head while he was laying defendless on the floor

what he is saying in plain English is the blacks sold other blacks to ARAB traders who then sold some to the English.... most slaves in WORLD HISTORY were not black BTW... stop fucking crying about it... if fact AMERICA set the blacks free show some fucking gratitude asshole :2 cents:

With the development of pseudoscientific racist ideas from about 1850, the Clearances were at times supported by belief that the Celtic "race" was inferior to the Anglo Saxon "race".[30] George Combe's popular and influential The Constitution of Man, published in 1828, provided a framework which would be used by some to support theories of racial superiority. In 1850 Robert Knox published The Races of Men which asserted the inferiority of the Celt compared to the Anglo Saxon and Nordic races.

The view that the economic failures of the Highlands were due to the shortcomings of the Celtic race was shared and expressed by the two most important Scottish newspapers, The Scotsman and the Glasgow Herald – and even the more northerly Inverness Courier.[30]

In 1851 The Scotsman wrote that


“Collective emigration is, therefore, the removal of a diseased and damaged part of our population. It is a relief to the rest of the population to be rid of this part.”[31]

Similar views were held by senior public officials. Sir Charles Trevelyan was co-founder with Sir John McNeill of the Highland and Island Emigration Society. In a letter to McNeill in 1852 he wrote that


“A national effort” would now be necessary in order to rid the land of “the surviving Irish and Scotch Celts”. The exodus would then allow for the settlement of a racially superior people of Teutonic stock. He welcomed “the prospects of flights of Germans settling here in increasing numbers – an orderly, moral, industrious and frugal people, less foreign to us than the Irish or Scotch Celt, a congenial element which will readily assimilate with our body politic.”[32][33]

did he call him the "N" word? that old man knew to get the fuck out of there! :uhoh

Did not read.

:2 cents: