GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tech Why Was Clintons Server Any Better Than VPS? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1163042)

RummyBoy 03-16-2015 09:08 PM

Why Was Clintons Server Any Better Than VPS?
 
How to Set Up a Clinton-Style Home Email Server - Yahoo Finance

Why wouldn't she have achieved the same results from a regular offshore VPS?
ie Without all the hassle described in the above link.

That's a challenge for you tech guys to answer.....

JFK 03-17-2015 01:31 AM

wonder as well ?

Barry-xlovecam 03-17-2015 05:23 AM

All email messages are logged on a server in plain text.

Local control of ''evidence'' v. message contents on a server in a data center.

Captain Kawaii 03-17-2015 05:24 AM

This is a more interesting version of the story than what Billary is saying.

Hillary Clinton Email ?What Mainstream Either Isn?t Telling Or Hasn?t Figured Out « MikeSouth.Com

crockett 03-17-2015 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RummyBoy (Post 20420388)
How to Set Up a Clinton-Style Home Email Server - Yahoo Finance

Why wouldn't she have achieved the same results from a regular offshore VPS?
ie Without all the hassle described in the above link.

That's a challenge for you tech guys to answer.....

That article goes abit overboard with the step by step trying to make it sound harder and more difficult than it is.. I mean really.. Installing the OS and software is made to sound like its ridicliously complicated and an elaborate step which is involved. They also wouldn't need some elaborate computer set up if all it was doing was running as a email server for a single account.. I mean lets get real here, we aren't using windows 3.1 anymore... The last PC I built which is probably 6 or 7 years old could easily run a email server.. It was a quad core for fucks sake..

I do think it's odd that she did this, but let's not go overboard with claims of "it's so difficult to run a home server therefore she must be hiding something". My guess is she is a control freak and wanted to control everything. Most women in high power are like this. It's kinda like those both lesbians that over do the man thing. Women In power are usually srounded by men and they tend to overdo the control thing..

RummyBoy 03-17-2015 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20420592)
That article goes abit overboard with the step by step trying to make it sound harder and more difficult than it is..

Yeah but we're savvy, they're dumb media people who think she's done something cool... :1orglaugh

Joshua G 03-17-2015 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20420592)
My guess is she is a control freak and wanted to control everything. Most women in high power are like this. It's kinda like those both lesbians that over do the man thing. Women In power are usually srounded by men and they tend to overdo the control thing..

i respect you man but sometimes you write some whoppers. :)

lesbo control freak? LOL! why you giving her so much benefit of doubt? she is machavellian, first & foremost. i'll tell you what she's hiding. She's hiding that she did little to no business as sec of state & spent most of her tenure on a taxpayer financed personal world tour. if the public knew all her business was sightseeing they'd be pissed.

:2 cents:

woj 03-17-2015 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20420708)
i'll tell you what she's hiding. She's hiding that she did little to no business as sec of state & spent most of her tenure on a taxpayer financed personal world tour. if the public knew all her business was sightseeing they'd be pissed.

:2 cents:

how is that different from most other politicians? :1orglaugh

killabit 03-17-2015 08:57 AM

For the sole reason of email exchange control and message logs... But jesus did she go the hard way... lmao...

Rochard 03-17-2015 09:45 AM

I don't understand why Clinton or anyone in government would use their own email address. No matter who you are, you are doing a job, and you have company (or in this case government) email. This removes any doubt of wrong doing, and security issues can no longer be blamed on you.

On the downside, your emails are all "company owned" and the person who replaces you has access to every email you ever sent out - and can use it against you. For example, right now a Democrat is in the White House, but in a few years it might be a Republican, and a Republican might be Secretary of State. This new Secretary of State would have access to every email Clinton sent out, and could be used to destroy her political ambitions at a later date.

At the same time, didn't Jeb Bush use personal email while he was governor?

Joshua G 03-17-2015 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killabit (Post 20420737)
For the sole reason of email exchange control and message logs... But jesus did she go the hard way... lmao...

yeah but the clintons dont know dick about servers. they hired consultants, who of course charged exorbitant rates & therefore provided massive overkill to justify the cost.

:2 cents:

TheSquealer 03-17-2015 11:44 AM

Hilary Clinton is as she's always been... a sociopathic and contemptuous twat who has never expressed anything but disdain for the rules. She knew she was going to make a run for president and wanted full control over all of her communications as Secretary of State... so she could decide what would and would not be made public.

If Jeb Bush was president and John McCain was Secretary of State and pulled the same thing KNOWING full well that it was illegal, with himself and staff being regularly reminded laws, rules and procedures regarding official communications, knowing that he was required to sign off to the federal government that he'd tuned over all communications which he clearly didn't or where he then said "yeah, I deleted tons of shit, can't really tell you much about how it was done thoigh" as it pertained to official government communications - democrats would be losing their fucking minds.

crockett 03-17-2015 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20420979)
Hilary Clinton is as she's always been... a sociopathic and contemptuous twat who has never expressed anything but disdain for the rules. She knew she was going to make a run for president and wanted full control over all of her communications as Secretary of State... so she could decide what would and would not be made public.

If Jeb Bush was president and John McCain was Secretary of State and pulled the same thing KNOWING full well that it was illegal, with himself and staff being regularly reminded laws, rules and procedures regarding official communications, knowing that he was required to sign off to the federal government that he'd tuned over all communications which he clearly didn't or where he then said "yeah, I deleted tons of shit, can't really tell you much about how it was done thoigh" as it pertained to official government communications - democrats would be losing their fucking minds.

Jeb Bush actually "did"use his own email accounts several times while he was Governor of FL, bypassing the official account.. Also it's not illegal for her to not us an official email, but it probably should be for "ALL" govt officials.

TheSquealer 03-17-2015 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20421029)
You know Jeb Bush used his own email accounts several times while he was Governor of FL, bypassing the official account..

This conversation is not about Jeb bush who was obviously used as an example for clear reasons, nor is it about ALL of the governors doing the same thing who were not heads of the Stare Department and subject to not only different laws, rules and regulations hut that weren't having endless classified discussion of Federal government operations

It is absolutely illegal for her to use her private email for government business and illegal for her to have not turned over all communications R elated to state department business. State governments and federal government employees have nohhing to do with each other

Additionally, any communication between her and Obama fall under laws specifically relating to the office of the president - which may now have been deleted.

Vacares 03-17-2015 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20420819)
For example, right now a Democrat is in the White House, but in a few years it might be a Republican, and a Republican might be Secretary of State. This new Secretary of State would have access to every email Clinton sent out, and could be used to destroy her political ambitions at a later date.

Those are public record. That is the whole point of this situation.

2MuchMark 03-17-2015 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20420979)
Hilary Clinton is as she's always been... a sociopathic and contemptuous twat who has never expressed anything but disdain for the rules. She knew she was going to make a run for president and wanted full control over all of her communications as Secretary of State... so she could decide what would and would not be made public.

If Jeb Bush was president and John McCain was Secretary of State and pulled the same thing KNOWING full well that it was illegal, with himself and staff being regularly reminded laws, rules and procedures regarding official communications, knowing that he was required to sign off to the federal government that he'd tuned over all communications which he clearly didn't or where he then said "yeah, I deleted tons of shit, can't really tell you much about how it was done thoigh" as it pertained to official government communications - democrats would be losing their fucking minds.

Lol - Jeb Bush did exactly the same thing Hillary did. And even worse, when he released those emails, he released lots and lots of private, confidential information including medical information of people he was communicating with. An honest mistake? Maybe, but Jeb should not shoot Hillary down for this.

Anyway, the point is moot. Hillary will win the presidency in 2016. No matter how much money donors give to the GOP, no matter who the final GOP nominee is, Hillary will crush them without ever having to lift a foot. If I were the Kochs, I'd save my money this time around.

(Then again, I really hope Donald Fuckface Trump runs. He's always good for a laugh).

TheSquealer 03-17-2015 12:40 PM

AAgain, what a governor did or did not do is 100% irrelevant as they fall under wholly different laws, rules and regulations. Hillary was briefed along with her staff continually on communications and their requirements and she was required by federal law to turn everything over and certify that she did in writing at the end of her tenure - which it appears she either did do and lied or didn't do and broke the law again.

Joshua G 03-17-2015 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20421054)
Anyway, the point is moot. Hillary will win the presidency in 2016. No matter how much money donors give to the GOP, no matter who the final GOP nominee is, Hillary will crush them without ever having to lift a foot.

sh'es going down dude. for the same reason she lost to obama, & echos what you just wrote: she is the anointed candidate. & is not going to do the footwork on the grassroots to win. happened in 2008, will happen again. by 2016 the country will be totally sick of her after her being in the media nonstop for 3 years. when is she going to decide to run? what a joke.

:2 cents:

crockett 03-17-2015 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20421054)

(Then again, I really hope Donald Fuckface Trump runs. He's always good for a laugh).

Donald Trump doesn't run to become president.. He runs because his business is self promotion and he gets a bunch of publicity from sticking his hair piece in the ring for 5 mins before dropping back out..

crockett 03-17-2015 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20421032)
This conversation is not about Jeb bush who was obviously used as an example for clear reasons, nor is it about ALL of the governors doing the same thing who were not heads of the Stare Department and subject to not only different laws, rules and regulations hut that weren't having endless classified discussion of Federal government operations

It is absolutely illegal for her to use her private email for government business and illegal for her to have not turned over all communications R elated to state department business. State governments and federal government employees have nohhing to do with each other

Additionally, any communication between her and Obama fall under laws specifically relating to the office of the president - which may now have been deleted.

I only mentioned it because you said "If Jeb Bush had done it.." Well he did so I pointed it out.

Rochard 03-17-2015 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vacares (Post 20421047)
Those are public record. That is the whole point of this situation.

I don't believe they are public record. I understand what you are saying, but can you point me to resource where all of these government emails are in fact public record? Where I can read any of the emails any of the past secretaries of state?

In this case, Clinton claims she has turned over all to the government. Jeb Bush has done the same. Should be the end of the story.

TheSquealer 03-17-2015 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20421190)
I only mentioned it because you said "If Jeb Bush had done it.." Well he did so I pointed it out.

You did so, to point out an irrelevant fact to the point being made, knowing full well that I used two Republican personalities specifically as an example and that had the roles been different, you and ********** would then gleefully pull out of each other long enough to demand their heads on a platter.

No one that breaks the law as a government official should be allowed to do so, regardless of party affiliation and everyone should be equally offended at them doing so, no matter who they are.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc