GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Nuclear winter. Are you ready? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1163089)

Sid70 03-17-2015 11:38 AM

Nuclear winter. Are you ready?
 
Russia starts nationwide show of force | Reuters

Barry-xlovecam 03-17-2015 12:05 PM

This was posted 3 hours ago ...
NATO In Military Exercise Across Water From Crimean Peninsula

Saber rattling and not an attack ...

TeenCat 03-17-2015 12:32 PM

nobody is, the most fun is that those idiots who are preparing will be the biggest danger for the rest of humans and humanity, fucking animals ... :2 cents:

2MuchMark 03-17-2015 12:40 PM

Pooty can't afford sabre rattling right now.

And then there's this: Putin's tombstone unveiled in Kiev | Video | Reuters.com

brassmonkey 03-17-2015 12:46 PM

sure if it will make the heat go away :2 cents::2 cents: you do know that is a theory and not fact right?? they said y2k eggs were bad 4 u blah blah blah get a tinfoil hat build a bomb shelter.

dyna mo 03-17-2015 12:54 PM

i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

seeandsee 03-17-2015 02:14 PM

Lets do it

Rochard 03-17-2015 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20421081)
i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

That would be a game changer.

If we could point a finger at any country that sets off a nuke in the US, you can bet the general public will be 100% behind sending in troops. It would be an all out kind of thing, similar to how the US population felt during WWII.

Captain Kawaii 03-17-2015 05:24 PM

Tickets for the Snowpiercer are going fast. Grab yours fast or its in the tail for you.

crockett 03-17-2015 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20421166)
That would be a game changer.

If we could point a finger at any country that sets off a nuke in the US, you can bet the general public will be 100% behind sending in troops. It would be an all out kind of thing, similar to how the US population felt during WWII.

Military doctrine calls for an eye for an eye appropriate exchange. If a nuke went off in the US and for a second they thought it was the work of Russia. You can damn sure bet nukes would go off in Russia. Sending troops wouldn't be the question, that's just how it works.. You should know that as ex military.

Also you can bet that if Nato troops invaded Russia as a result, that Russia would retaliate with nukes. Then it would go gang busters and tribal people living in the outskirts of nowhere would be the winners. I really don't think Russia or the US or any other country is dumb enough to use nukes in this day & age. They don't call it mutual assured destruction for no reason. It's the reason we try so hard to keep the absolute nut case countries from having nukes because countries like NK might actually use them..

Dead 03-17-2015 06:09 PM

Are we going to die...Again?

dyna mo 03-17-2015 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20421325)
Military doctrine calls for an eye for an eye appropriate exchange. If a nuke went off in the US and for a second they thought it was the work of Russia. You can damn sure bet nukes would go off in Russia. Sending troops wouldn't be the question, that's just how it works.. You should know that as ex military.

Also you can bet that if Nato troops invaded Russia as a result, that Russia would retaliate with nukes. Then it would go gang busters and tribal people living in the outskirts of nowhere would be the winners. I really don't think Russia or the US or any other country is dumb enough to use nukes in this day & age. They don't call it mutual assured destruction for no reason. It's the reason we try so hard to keep the absolute nut case countries from having nukes because countries like NK might actually use them..

I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

Dead 03-17-2015 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20421333)
I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

Will get??? that's cute.........:upsidedow

brassmonkey 03-17-2015 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 20421303)
Tickets for the Snowpiercer are going fast. Grab yours fast or its in the tail for you.

the secret ingredient :repuke "eat them while their still warm" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :helpme

crockett 03-17-2015 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20421333)
I'm not so sure about that. you sound as if nuclear retailation is a foregone conclusion and knowing what i know about military strategy, there are always several different scenarios planned out to choose from.


the other problem with this is you can count on ANY nuke device detonating being from Russia, not necc. directly, but some of that [unaccounted for] Russian nuclear material will ultimately get to the wrong people and they will make a dirty nuke out of it, which i think is more certain than a thermonuclear or wtf ever the mushroom cloud one is.

but yeah, terrorists, with the money they are acquiring, will get nuclear material at some point.

Well that would be the trick, to make it appear as if it wasn't them, but when the dust settled, we would know by the signature of the bomb where it came from. The thing is Russia wouldn't be dumb enough to do it in the US, they would pick a low tier Nato ally.

There are certain reasons we don't listen to hardliner war mongers like John McCain or Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu. Both would get the world blown up.

It's like in Ukraine.. It's not Nato being weak allowing Russia to do what it wants. It's Nato being smart and understanding what full support could trigger and is Ukraine worth that. Ukraine tried to play both sides of the coin, they tried to be buddy buddy and not upset Russia while trying to cuddle up to Nato. They are not a clear or trusted ally therefore they are not worth the risk of all out war.

This worked against them, and Russia pounced on it. Russia in the mean time gets one step forward while taking 2 steps backwards. Ukraine was not worth the escalation risk for Nato but it was a great way to weaken Russia economy. Russia gains a military base and in the process further isolates it's self and seriously harms it's economy.

Nato wouldn't allow the same to a Nato member and Russia knows not to step over that line, just like Nato understands not to step over the line by sticking troops in Ukraine.

It's all a chess game and a nuke going off by way of Russia in the US or any core members of Nato isn't gonna happen. :2 cents:

SBJ 03-17-2015 07:28 PM


Is this a game? or is it for real?

2MuchMark 03-17-2015 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20421081)
i predict a nuke detonation within 3 years. prolly in Europe, maybe in USA.

http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/video/v...bie_Downer.png

2MuchMark 03-17-2015 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBJ (Post 20421385)

Is this a game? or is it for real?

It's a game.

Check out DEFCON - Introversion software





And also this:

Global Thermonuclear War - Shall We Play a Game?


Enjoy!

dyna mo 03-17-2015 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20421351)
Well that would be the trick, to make it appear as if it wasn't them, but when the dust settled, we would know by the signature of the bomb where it came from. The thing is Russia wouldn't be dumb enough to do it in the US, they would pick a low tier Nato ally.

There are certain reasons we don't listen to hardliner war mongers like John McCain or Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu. Both would get the world blown up.

It's like in Ukraine.. It's not Nato being weak allowing Russia to do what it wants. It's Nato being smart and understanding what full support could trigger and is Ukraine worth that. Ukraine tried to play both sides of the coin, they tried to be buddy buddy and not upset Russia while trying to cuddle up to Nato. They are not a clear or trusted ally therefore they are not worth the risk of all out war.

This worked against them, and Russia pounced on it. Russia in the mean time gets one step forward while taking 2 steps backwards. Ukraine was not worth the escalation risk for Nato but it was a great way to weaken Russia economy. Russia gains a military base and in the process further isolates it's self and seriously harms it's economy.

Nato wouldn't allow the same to a Nato member and Russia knows not to step over that line, just like Nato understands not to step over the line by sticking troops in Ukraine.

It's all a chess game and a nuke going off by way of Russia in the US or any core members of Nato isn't gonna happen. :2 cents:

there's a reason ukraine is not in NATO. I believe they've been denied more than once.

you make a solid observation though, russia would never have to release a nuke directly, they could simply get materials to terrorists, etc, a nuke is a nuke.

dyna mo 03-17-2015 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20421393)

have you seen the reports on the unaccounted for nuclear materials in Russia/eastern europe/europe since the USSR broke up? it's a staggering #.


P.S. the debbie downer thing works better with a youtube, so you can get the wah wahh part too!

pornmasta 03-17-2015 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid70 (Post 20420972)

just move to portugal and don't buy this iphone 6

RummyBoy 03-17-2015 08:48 PM

UKRAINE can slip into Nuclear War - well said by John Browne:



Im suspicious that CyberSEO disappeared at the same time as Putin.... :1orglaugh

just a punk 03-18-2015 02:07 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc