Couple found guilty of having sex on a Florida beach, faces up to 15 years in prison
 

It?s been dubbed the ?sex-on-the-beach? trial.

A Florida jury on Monday convicted Jose Caballero, 40, and Elissa Alvarez, 20, on charges that they had sex on Bradenton Beach in broad daylight. They face up to 15 years behind bars and will have to register as sex offenders.

Each of them faced two charges of lewd and lascivious behavior, carrying a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison, the Bradenton Herald reported.

Defense attorney Ronald Kurpiers told the newspaper that Caballero and Alvarez were ?devastated? by the jury?s decision.

Prosecutors ? including the elected 12th Circuit State Attorney Ed Brodsky ? sought a conviction in the high-profile trial to make it clear that such behavior is not acceptable on the community?s public beaches.

?We?re dealing with basically tourists, that came from Brandon and Riverview and West Virginia, and they?re here on the beaches of Manatee County, our public beaches,? Assistant State Attorney Anthony Dafonseca said, according to the Herald. ?So you want to make sure that this isn?t something that just goes by the wayside. And that it is well known to the community, what will be tolerated and what won?t be.?

Prosecutors said Caballero could face the maximum 15 years because he has been out of prison for less than three years on a drug charge, but they will seek a more lenient sentence for Alvarez: 60 days in jail, though she still has to register as a sex offender, Fox affiliate WTVT reported.

Dafonseca told the station that prosecutors offered plea deals but that the pair rejected them.

Couple found guilty of having sex on a Florida beach, faces up to 15 years in prison - The Washington Post

I have tapped so much pussy on Florida beaches I would be in jail for 50 lifetimes. It was at night though, Is that the only problem? I mean come on go at night anytime and some couple is fucking on the beach.
Every girl I've had visit would say oh I always wanted to have sex on the beach.
You got it babe but this is nuts.

Sex on the beach? Most girls get horny as hell at the beach. Just don't be an idiot. Heres my g/f playing with herself lol

http://i.imgur.com/WBUqPJo.jpg


.

yeah and there's kids like 50 yards or less away

Who didn't see shit so what's your point?

its a felony if a kids see it or an adult with kids :2 cents::2 cents:

Last time I fucked at a beach was in St. Pete. We did it in the water though, gave her a natural salt water douche :thumbsup

Justice system at its finest.

I remember that case. Apparently there were kids watching and people told them to stop and they didn't. And they weren't hiding anything like most people fucking on the beach would try to do. 15 years is still a joke. It's actually scary how long some of these sentences can get for somewhat harmless crimes.

Sad to see they are mexican's. I could use a new tv and if they were black I loot one from the best buy after their conviction. Terrible luck I have.

I think saying "Merica!" is in place.

Seems the punishment does not fit the crime here...

I would have argued that the people watching could have looked the other way, even though that would appear to be an argument from ignorance to a jury. Just give me 20 minutes and they would see my point. America is way too prude!

It wouldn't surprise me if the same Prosecutor had just made a plea deal with a murder the day before offering a reduced sentence of 7-10yrs.

That is how FUCKED up American Law is today.

Considering that she is literally half his age and looks doable in the mugshot, they should give him a high-five and maybe some community service.

Yeah, plea deal to get just someone in the jail. The shocking part is not that murderer gets reduced sentence; the shocking part is that it is not figured out who is the murderer.

Some of you seem to be missing that the guy has priors, probably on probation. The girl is not getting much at all. The sex offenders list does seem out there though, reserve that for the super creeps.

you're making an assumption then pointing to your assumption as proof of the USA legal system being fucked up today.

the simple fact is these laws, plea bargains and reduced sentences have been woven into the fabric of our legal system since day 1.

The fact that it is "sooo" hard to figure out who is the murder is a real shame.

"Dude shoots someone in their house, drops the gun with fingerprints on it and flees". Cops arrive on the scene and accidentally kick the gun or stupidly pick it up and put in somewhere safe. Cops tape off the scene and nobody enters the area until it is scrubbed by ci. Later the defense argues that the evidence was tampered with and the murder walks because the courts jury couldn't determine who the murder was. :helpme

In working legal systems weak case goes in favor of the accused, but not exactly like that. But as you don't have working legal system in any way, that is poor case anyhow.

And yes, it is not always easy to find who is the murderer. I mean actually finding him, not just putting some guy into the jail. And after finding him; sentencing him in the court.

We once were caught shooting in public and had to pay a fine of 200 czk ($10)

No one caught us the other 500 times.

That is absurd. And people in this business defending the sentence would be even more absurd.

Sex is taboo in America...America is about violence.

He should have beat her instead of fucked her. :thumbsup

Would be in less trouble.

how good would business be if latin queers peeing in each other's buttholes wasn't taboo?

I lost my virginity on the beach, if the sentence was a year for each second I'd get a solid 5 years.

Dave

I lost my virginity on the beach, if the sentence was a year for each second I'd get a solid 5 years.

Dave

How a so called "weak case" is defined matters most. The point I am making here is that today our biggest problem is that strong cases are flipped to appear as "weak cases" because of things like assuming evidence was tampered with because some CI trustee wasn't the only one who touched said evidence. That is just one example of the kind of retarded that has infiltrated American Law.

It's a rare case that the prosecutor will put someone in front of a Jury who doesn't deserve to be sentence for the crime in question. Since crime in America is so bad there are many instances where the prosecutors only option is to put a known murder on trial for drug related crimes. That is one reason why you will not see the DOJ releasing all the so called, "non-violent" drug convicts. Many were locked up for one crime, but have a history of others that are unsolved.

Lastly the sentencing in America has completely failed. I don't give two hoots and a nut if you think passive punishments work better; you're wrong! Here in America people used to be severely punished. The death penalty was nearly instant. If you were convicted of a crime and sentences to be executed, you were read your last rights and given a chance to say one last word before they tied a noose around you neck right there in the courtroom and let the floor drop below you feet so you would hang and die right then and there. Just think about that for a second. Murders were executed within minutes of being sentenced. Go get a history book of crime statistics and look at the murder rates throughout American pre-1900; less that 50 per year. Today murders spend their entire life on death row in some states, but most are released after 5-7 years and allowed to live in society again.

I will never agree with any punishment for murder besides execution and swiftly at that. I would vote to go back to the pre-1900 styles of handling those kinda BS humans too.

:1orglaugh:thumbsup

I know right! :thumbsup

Fags are some fucked up people! :thumbsup

http://hottero.com/peeing/content/images/1234.jpg

They had a sex on the beach, so what???? :) 15 yeas in prison for that, c'mon guys...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

I have heard that in some other countries courts use common sense. Relating to that evidence tampering and such.

What comes to that prosecutor thing; he isn't the one who decides someone being guilty or not. So, how we know that does the accused deserve something or not, as it is the court that decides that deserving part? And anyways, in 90 % of cases he does plea deal, no court, no peer-review, nothing. And many of these plea deal guys/girls are innocent even in very hard crimes (those they haven't actually done). It has been studied.

What comes to the hard penalties you seek after, I have just one word: Merica.. well.. and Isis.. jihadist Somalia.. actually there are lot of words.

By the way, your pre-something murder rates are not probably that well compared to these days, you know: methods/ resources to even define crime having been happened, population number, etc. have all changed.

Nowadays public sex happening everywhere...it means that at least 25% of the population should be in jail then ?

Jail for a public sex? For real? Here in Russia it's just a disorderly conduct: article 20.1 of administrative (non-criminal) code. Which is punished with a fine from 29825 (~$500 USD) to 59650 rubles (~$1000 USD). One more reason to live in non-free, non-liberal and non-democratic place like my evil totalitarian country :pimp

The famous sex in the beach

Isn't porn illegal now in Russia?

on the beach! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh in the beach :helpme

1) Public sex is not a porn. It's a disorderly conduct. Max punishment for that article is up to 15 days (not years!) of administrative arrest. But not in case of public sex of course. For example, if a person was drunk and rowdy (beat someone or crushed some property), then he definitely needs a few days in prison to think about his behavior. In all other cases you will be fined with $500-$1000 (according to the administrative code). Taking into account the total corruption of Russian police, you'll get away for $100.

2) The legal status of pornography in Russia is uncertain - and this is about distribution which can be legal and illegal (actually nobody knows what legal/illegal distribution is). Shooting of porn is absolutely legal (e.g. home video or filming of an orgy in a swinger club are not forbidden). Also there is no law against of viewing and storing of any kind porn (even if it's zoo, cp or any other shit).

3) In fact, only shooting and distribution of cp is a crime here. A serious crime, I'd say. Everything else is ok.