Mass Murderer Entering Church
 

He sat in the church for an hour before opening fire - chilling seeing people like this right before they take it upon themselves to end other people's lives in cold blood. to some extent murders done in anger/retribution, murders for financial gain are understandable but to just slaughter innocent people whom you don't know, have never done anything to you is incomprehensible.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHx63IyUwAEFiip.png

This church shooting in Charleston would be at least the 142nd mass shooting in America in 2015.:ugone2far

Entirely wrong and misleading.

Head planted firmly in the sand.....

This is so tragic and heartbreaking.

I thought it may have been one of those two guys who escaped from that prison some days ago. This kinda turns the attention away from that, which would have been the whole idea.

But whoever is responsible, I hope he's hunted down. Dead or alive (preferably dead).

How did he acquire the firearm? Legally purchased? Stole it from Mom?

So your logic is if one of those escapees shot up a church it would take attention away from them? What?

A gift from his family for his 21st birthday.

hang the bastard

'Merica

Who needs a reason ??

that's not going by the definition of mass shooting, which is 3+ dead. most of those are 0 dead.

no, unlike you, i try to make sure the problem is properly defined so that the solution solves the problem.

you are more emotional and lack the ability to look at the facts. that's why you can oly write sophomoric quips in response to people who know more than you and who think at a higher level than you are capable.

So, not a criminal who had an illegal weapon.

Candles, cake, deadly weapon whose only purpose is to kill humans, balloons and a fucking clown. Happy Birthday.

New York Times screen grab about the story, nice ad placement below photo .....


http://i.imgur.com/AD8ByXv.png


.

If they did a story about how targeted advertising pissed off a lot of readers, the ad would probably be for targets.

Not taking any sides here, but I think that is about mass shooting vs. mass killing

i'm not taking sides either, but the "data" referred to was mass shootings. the legal terms are mass shootings v. active shooter.
the legal definition of mass shooting is 3+ dead


isolate the problem to find the proper solution.

that sounds like a mass killing. Wouldn't a mass shooting be 3+ shot? I'm not a lawyer and have no idea. When does it become 'guns are the problem' and now time for the solution?

i'm going by the general understanding of the terms by criminologists. I'm also on the side of criminologists such as Jim Fox, PHD

James Alan Fox
according to his research, mass shootings are not on the rise,

Mass Shootings Aren't On the Rise


he also illustrates that the problem is not as simple as "guns are the problem".

DOn't get me wrong, we have several problems where guns are involved, but mass shootings isn't at the top of the list. moreover, better legislation re: mental health and gun control laws would seem to be a step in the right direction when it comes to mass shootings.

Fox News Blames The 'War On Christians' For Charleston Attack


http://crooksandliars.com/files/medi...?ts=1434640616


When these NRA republicans are not supporting murder, they are using the Duggar defense to fuck someones baby sister.

Yup, because the church shooting was obviously very racially-motivated. And one thing the media didn't portray the escaped prisoners as, was racists. So I doubt anyone's first suspicion upon hearing about the church shooting was "I bet it was one of those damned escaped prisoners."

While we now know it was unrelated to the escaped prisoners...at the time, I suspected this to be a staged event by one of them. The motive being to get their mugshots off the front page of every newspaper (because it worked). This would prove them greater mobility, due to no more awkward moments of having to stand beside their mugshots everywhere they may go, hoping they aren't recognized. I doubt they want to go back to prison. I hope this makes some sense to you.

So lets say someone with AK47 enters the mall ful of people, starts shooting all directions, wounds some people, but no one (or just one, or 2) dies. You would not call it mass shooting? :)

Again, these are not my definitions. I am not the expert. I read what I can, learn the definitions and try to form rationale views based on experts that spend their lives and careers trying to understand the issues. I posted a link to one of those experts.

what a way to spin this ... they could as well have said it was an attack on our " freedoms " ....

He didnt ring the bell

Fixed one square :


http://blackmonsters.com/gfy/tbingo.jpg


:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

The escapes couldn't find a black church where they escaped because it would be too obvious it was them.
So they drove 900+ miles to Charleston SC and then realized they needed to throw us off their trail by shooting some people.


:1orglaugh