GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Renowned scientist:we have 35 years to save Earth (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1171299)

Dvae 07-30-2015 03:49 PM

Renowned scientist:we have 35 years to save Earth
 
In 2009, Prince Charles said humanity had 100 months to save the planet from itself. But now he's riding a different polo pony. He says we have 35 years to save Earth from the ravages of global warming.
Why the change? Who knows? to make it look like the world has been warming.
More likely, he just saw the 100-month mark rushing at him on the calendar and realized we are no nearer disaster now than we were when he made his pronouncement six years ago.
Whatever the case, Charles has one thing in common with that vast fellowship of men who have been declaring that the world is going to end since just about the day it began: They've all been wrong, and spectacularly so.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: Prince Charles Delays End Of World, Needs More Time To Vacation - Investors.com
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

clickity click 07-30-2015 03:51 PM

One of these days someone will be right.

wehateporn 07-30-2015 03:52 PM

There is special plan, already well underway


clickity click 07-30-2015 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 20537790)
There is special plan, already well underway


What has the flu jab got to do with this?

wehateporn 07-30-2015 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickity click (Post 20537791)
What has the flu jab got to do with this?

Population reduction

clickity click 07-30-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 20537792)
Population reduction

I get that but the prince was talking about global warming..

wehateporn 07-30-2015 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickity click (Post 20537795)
I get that but the prince was talking about global warming..


jscott 07-30-2015 08:48 PM

Depopulation, sad to say, is the only way imo :helpme

ErectMedia 07-30-2015 08:53 PM

pretty sure I'll be dead by then so have fun kids. :thumbsup

EliteWebmaster 07-30-2015 11:19 PM

Charles can save earth now by not subjecting us to seeing his hag granny whore Camila. Good grief. Everytime I see her on tv, I vomit in my mouth thinking who would want to cheat with that "Lockness monster Camila" over beautiful Diana.

I guess some guys are just addicted to ugly.

aka123 07-31-2015 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 20537786)
More likely, he just saw the 100-month mark rushing at him on the calendar and realized we are no nearer disaster now than we were when he made his pronouncement six years ago.

Well, at least Earth is more polluted now than it was 6 years ago, and there is for example more birth defects regarding most species, including humans. Luckily end has not came, but our kids are more fuckt up.

Martin 07-31-2015 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 20537792)
Population reduction

Im all for it.

Jel 07-31-2015 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EliteWebmaster (Post 20538032)
Charles can save earth now by not subjecting us to seeing his hag granny whore Camila. Good grief. Everytime I see her on tv, I vomit in my mouth thinking who would want to cheat with that "Lockness monster Camila" over beautiful Diana.

I guess some guys are just addicted to ugly.

yeah, all beautiful women are rational, easy to get along with, never act like cunts behind closed doors, and blend with whatever personality type their partners are, so there is never a clash there. Also it's always the guy who is at fault for everything if the woman is beautiful (in the beholders' eye), she was completely wronged, and any of her own indiscretions/faults are all the outcome of the partners' behaviour.

Also there are never 2 sides to anything when a beautiful woman is involved :thumbsup

hottoddy 07-31-2015 11:25 AM

Western governments are already working on secret selective viruses based on genetic markers. The genetic databases people flock to for heritage information greatly helps their accuracy. More than 50% African, Arabic, Hispanic markers of certain origin (take your pick) - the virus can be engineered to target certain populations. Despite this high level of genetic engineering, there will be a certain amount of collateral damage. This will be offset by short vaccine life, geographic distribution, and vaccines issued to certain individuals with measurable value. Soon, the world population can be reduced by 90% at will on the microscopic level, and those eliminated will be largely determined by those with the power and know how to do so.

Either that or another fucking asteroid.

AmateurBros 07-31-2015 11:43 AM

Mini Ice Age to start around 2030

Jel 07-31-2015 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538437)
Western governments are already working on secret selective viruses based on genetic markers.

Source?

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538437)
The genetic databases people flock to for heritage information greatly helps their accuracy. More than 50% African, Arabic, Hispanic markers of certain origin (take your pick) - the virus can be engineered to target certain populations.

Source?

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538437)
Despite this high level of genetic engineering, there will be a certain amount of collateral damage. This will be offset by short vaccine life, geographic distribution, and vaccines issued to certain individuals with measurable value.

Source?

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538437)
Soon, the world population can be reduced by 90% at will on the microscopic level, and those eliminated will be largely determined by those with the power and know how to do so.

Source?

ps apologies if this is a piss take that went over my head :)

brassmonkey 07-31-2015 02:30 PM

i'll be dead or near it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh screw u!

MaDalton 07-31-2015 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20538601)
Source?



Source?



Source?



Source?

ps apologies if this is a piss take that went over my head :)

i'm sure one of the Youtube scientists has a fitting video

hottoddy 07-31-2015 02:59 PM

Jel, I was just doing some X-Files jive talk. But, I wouldn't be surprised if we see "selective" viruses start wiping out certain populations in our lifetimes (if not already).

Jel 07-31-2015 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538626)
Jel, I was just doing some X-Files jive talk. But, I wouldn't be surprised if we see "selective" viruses start wiping out certain populations in our lifetimes (if not already).

Ha, nice! :thumbsup

marlboroack 07-31-2015 07:24 PM

Oh well :pimp

klinton 08-01-2015 12:19 AM

why you need source for that ?
think logically: if something CAN be done, why wouldnt they DO IT ?
this is extreme example that the guy posted..but you may think about selective viruses attacking selected persons etc. or families...why not ?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20538601)
Source?



Source?



Source?



Source?

ps apologies if this is a piss take that went over my head :)


druid66 08-01-2015 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 20537950)
Depopulation, sad to say, is the only way imo :helpme

colonizing our moon and mars could help to.
not sure if we are capable though...

EonBlue 08-01-2015 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hottoddy (Post 20538437)
Western governments are already working on secret selective viruses based on genetic markers. The genetic databases people flock to for heritage information greatly helps their accuracy. More than 50% African, Arabic, Hispanic markers of certain origin (take your pick) - the virus can be engineered to target certain populations. Despite this high level of genetic engineering, there will be a certain amount of collateral damage. This will be offset by short vaccine life, geographic distribution, and vaccines issued to certain individuals with measurable value. Soon, the world population can be reduced by 90% at will on the microscopic level, and those eliminated will be largely determined by those with the power and know how to do so.

http://i.imgur.com/vxZ2R8R.jpg



.

Milfer 08-01-2015 07:58 AM

I don't agree, this Earth has experience Shit that we can not even imagine, and still kicking for billions of years.

Earth is Safe, but people...?

Best-In-BC 08-01-2015 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 20537792)
Population reduction

Dumby :1orglaugh

brassmonkey 08-01-2015 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 20537786)
In 2009, Prince Charles said humanity had 100 months to save the planet from itself. But now he's riding a different polo pony. He says we have 35 years to save Earth from the ravages of global warming.
Why the change? Who knows? to make it look like the world has been warming.
More likely, he just saw the 100-month mark rushing at him on the calendar and realized we are no nearer disaster now than we were when he made his pronouncement six years ago.
Whatever the case, Charles has one thing in common with that vast fellowship of men who have been declaring that the world is going to end since just about the day it began: They've all been wrong, and spectacularly so.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: Prince Charles Delays End Of World, Needs More Time To Vacation - Investors.com
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

this is a hypothesis! you cannot predict the future LOL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc