iran
 

We are going to blow up each other sooner or later anyway.

Persian has NOT won a war for over 2500 years :2 cents:

There are no winners in nuclear war, only losers.

There is no proper solution with Iran.

The Republican party is completely against this agreement. If we don't sign it, then what? We either allow them to develop a nuclear bomb or go to war with them.

FYI iran is at war with us (if we let the Nazis have Poland they will leave us alone)

Except Iran hasn't invaded anyone "we" have.. So think about the same thing you just said as Iran saying it.. Don't worry just let them have afghan, Iraq and they will stop... Oh wait how about letting them have Syria, Yemen they will,stop right guys.. Hey they aren't stopping, I told yea we needed nukes..

Iran is acting exactly how anyone would.. Given the situation.. Yea sure they have a bunch of Relgious psychos running around, but hell we do too..

persia has attacked others for thousands of years man. name changes don't change that.




turn your watch back about 100,000 years

I'm talking about recently.. What was their last war The Iraq/Iran war? Sure they funnel money to support uprisings or terrorists but so do we.. We just call them freedom fighters or rebels if we do it..

Now that we have an agreement with Iran, Iran finds a shit load of Uranium. I guess only idiots would trust Iranians

Report: Iran finds 'unexpectedly high' uranium reserve after Dems seal nuke deal for Obama | Fox News

Iran has reportedly found an unexpectedly high reserve of uranium, following assessments that the country is running low on the nuclear raw material and just days after President Obama essentially secured an international nuclear deal with the country's leaders.

The discovery was reported first by Reuters and based on comments made by Iranian nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi to the state news agency IRNA.

"I cannot announce (the level of) Iran's uranium mine reserves," Salehi was quoted as saying. "The important thing is that before aerial prospecting for uranium ores we were not too optimistic, but the new discoveries have made us confident about our reserves."

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

i know, you were saying Iran is acting as you would expect it to, considering we have it surrounded. and regardless of our meddling over there, perhaps the reason why we have them surrounded and have a real hard time trusting them with nukes is on account of their 3000 year history of slaughtering each other combined with the fact that just up till about 50 years ago these people were riding camels and still, in 2015, can't figure out democracy, mostly due to religious baloney.

*maybe* that's why we have them surrounded and have that prob with them and nuclear.

We all made an agreement with Iran right? They followed the rules right? Yet we still want to step in and take their toys even though they did what was asked of them?

Crocket isn't too far off.

How many countries has Iran invaded in the last 100 years? Now how many have we invaded?

The most terroristic organization in the world that lays hands on whatever they want with hypocritical force... American government.

from a recent post, was it EONBlue? -

"i was against the iran nuclear deal until i heard they get to inspect their own military nuclear facilities."



Atomic Energy Organization Of Iran Chief Ali Akbar Salehi: We Have Reached An Understanding With The IAEA On The PMD, Now Political Backing Exists And The Results Will Be Very Positive


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...92a_story.html

Having said that... None of us should have nuclear weapons. It should be a world wide agreement to ban destroy and nullify the use or need for nuclear weapons. There would never be any good outcome or any reason to actually light the fuse on one of those firecrackers. It would be the end of many things... quite possibly the end of a stable civilization.

i'll be a happy hypocrite in turn for no nukes in iran.

that's just my view, i get the hypocrite point. we have nukes. but more nukes because hypocrite isn't something i agree with, especially when it comes to the middle east.

The hypocrisy statement wasn't directly pointed at the fact that we have nukes as well. But more so at our intentions and excuses for entering other countries. If we look through time... We have made agreements with other nations to uphold a set of certain rules and standards when dealing with each other. It seems we make these agreements then we turn a blind eye to certain assets(countries) when we see fit and on the other hand we bend rules in our favor out of agenda and gain.

I am American... but anyone can easily look from the outside(some truly can) and see that if the world were to choose one single organization as the most tactically invasive, mongering and down right terroristic entity... it would be the American government. The hypocritical part is we deem it all necessary to fight terrorism in and abroad.


The nukes part is just a bad thing in general. The problem is... there will never be just one nuke. It's not like if we dropped a nuke on someone that they just all the sudden shut up and succumb... Even their neighbors will be super pissed and get itchy trigger fingers.

I think the odds have gotten greater of nuclear armed terrorists.

The USA should make clear that any nuclear terrorism will result in total retaliation against all targets of opportunity indiscriminately -- the whole world goes up in a fireball including ourselves.

This coincides with Israel's Sampson Option -- they will fry everyone they can even if it means their own demise -- Iran knows that this is their official undeclared policy.

There are too many nuclear players that are not stable countries.
Too many might become suicidal. Disarming is a pipe dream.

So, you like The B52s but not REM?

Hah, good eye. Yes and no. The B-52s are easily one of my favorite rock bands, period.

But I don't dislike R.E.M. at all. Certainly you would have to agree that Stipe's singing style is not the most clear and coherent. That's not a bad thing at all. But it is there. I could make jokes about the B-52s too, given the opportunity.

It was really more of a joke than anything really. Maybe if L-Pink didn't hog all the jokes some others jokes could stand a chance.

They were our best buddies right up until we sponsored a failed coup of their govt which became the excuse to usher in the Islamic revolution.

In the 70s average Iranians were not like they are today. Yes they are shit heads but we helped push them in that direction.

moron statement homie... like this: no one should drive drunk... you see how that's working out right? :2 cents:

I really like both bands. Must have been a fun scene in Athens when both were starting out.

I must have missed that in the news.

I honestly love it when the United States uses it's military; I get a huge fucking hard on. But I don't recall Iran attacking the United States. Did they attack the United States? If so, why hasn't the United States attacked back? It's not like we need their oil. And it's not like the United States cannot have planes over Tehran in an hour or two.

Like I said, we have two options. Go along with the agreement, or go to war. I mean, I am perfectly okay with us going to war with Iran and bitch smacking them around for the next ten years.

so Iranians shouting death to America etc are really expressions of deep love and gratitude.. thanks for clearing that up :thumbsup

Tell us another zinger Barry.

Iran has an agenda -- it started with their Islamic Revolution.

Hopefully, they don't push their luck.

Yes, eradicating Isis.

I'd like to think more unrealistic than moronic... :thumbsup

It will come to war eventually.