![]() |
'External influence' caused crash - WTF Does That Mean?..
Sinai plane crash: 'External influence' caused crash - BBC News
Quote:
|
Ufo......
|
That means it could be a bomb. The ISIS animals have no air defense systems that can shot down the plane at that high attitude, but they can bring a bomb in their baggage. I don't think the Egyptian airport security is as strict as the 1st world ones.
Personally I can't accept any version while the official investigation is not complete. |
Plane had a tail strike before:
Doomed Russian jet that crashed in Egypt suffered 'tail strike' in 2001 - The Economic Times there is another case where a plane broke apart 22 years later because of that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Airlines_Flight_611 and the tail in this case was found closest to the airport, means it broke off first that would be a viable, non-terrorist explanation |
It's cool that GFY experts know how and why it happened. But I'm not that smart, so I'll be waiting for the investigation results. When Pan Am Flight 103 was blown up by a bomb left by a Libyan terrorist, it took about 3 years to find out the truth.
|
I am no expert, but I don't see any obvious fire damage. From the crash pictures I have seen: that plane looks like it was twisted and shredded mid-flight. Strange indeed...
Since there is an active (criminal negligence?) investigation of this airline in Russia any statement that they make may well be influenced by that:2 cents: It could be a simple explanation of metal fatigue or it could be sabotage ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_...#Metal_fatigue that does raise suspicions |
Could be anything - Bomb, Bird, Asteroid...... "external influence" doesn't tell you much.
|
It means someone blew it the fuck up. I can't wait to see Russia's response if it turns out that ISIS was in fact responsible. If true, they may have just sealed their fate.
|
|
|
it means, for that guy, it had better be an external matter, or it's another implosion and entirely the fault of the company.
|
Quote:
(yes, i know they don't care who they fight with, it's all about overthrowing governments to place a puppet there instead.) |
Quote:
i will be suprised if they say its a bomb, even if it was. too much politics is flying around this plane, & the bad tail theory has just enough merit to placate the masses. :2 cents: |
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i thought the CIA guys who told us Iraq had WMDs were also pros. :) |
Quote:
The third clue is to know that Russian airliners have one of the worst safety records in the world. Usually a lot of pilot error and shitty maintenance is what causes their crashes. Id belive shitty maintenance brought this plane down before I've belive IS did.. At least in the Ukraine downing, there was picture evidence of the BUK system being there then being hurried away the day of the shoot down.. IS has zero proof and we all know those idiots video tape everything for their propaganda vids.. If they were going to shoot down an airliner, they damn sure would of video taped it.. |
Quote:
|
Was watching the news this morning and they claim to have not paid the workers for 2 months what does this have anything to do with the plane coming down?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Aercap is just the title holder.. Is this how Russian media is trying to spin the crash as not being A Russian companies responsibility? That's like saying Ford is responsible for you being drunk and running your leased car into a tree.. |
Quote:
:) |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123