GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News North Korea (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1182305)

ilnjscb 01-05-2016 09:19 PM

North Korea
 
North Korea Says It Successfully Conducted Hydrogen-Bomb Test

While you dims on the left and right howl for Assad and call white men terrorists, North Korea, the only state to threaten the US with a fuckin nuclear bomb in 20 years now actually has the most powerful kind, almost small enough to mount on an ICBM.

The human rights abuses in NK far exceed anything Assad or any other Arab state has ever dreamed of. And a nuclear bomb will do a lot worse than peacefully occupy a building, it will roast you right in your safe spaces.

Stop being nut licking cuck sycophants and think for yourselves.

EddyTheDog 01-05-2016 09:23 PM

Some guy on the BBC just said it wasn't a Hydrogen bomb - He sounded like he knew what he was talking about...

Coup 01-05-2016 09:44 PM

lol @ believing anything north korea says

Twoface31 01-05-2016 09:45 PM

ummm this is stranged......

ilnjscb 01-05-2016 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 20690448)
Some guy on the BBC just said it wasn't a Hydrogen bomb - He sounded like he knew what he was talking about...

Yeah yeah, regardless there has been a continuous improvement. Each time someone says, "be calm, foolish people, for they do not yet possess technology X, and thus are no threat to you" but each time they get closer. Since 2003 they've steadily improved their chance of delivering a nuclear strike.

ilnjscb 01-05-2016 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 20690481)
lol @ believing anything north korea says

You doubt the human rights abuses of the regime?

xXXtesy10 01-05-2016 10:06 PM

this will make obama cry

Coup 01-05-2016 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20690485)
You doubt the human rights abuses of the regime?

I would if they said they committed them.

JasonCollins 01-06-2016 01:52 AM

north korea beat portugal and won the world cup in 2014.

Video: North Korea's fake World Cup final - Telegraph

TeenCat 01-06-2016 03:07 AM

http://i.lidovky.cz/15/111/lnc460/ELE5f1c51_KimTech.jpg

:thumbsup

j3rkules 01-06-2016 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonCollins (Post 20690595)
north korea beat portugal and won the world cup in 2014.

Video: North Korea's fake World Cup final - Telegraph

:1orglaugh

AdultKing 01-06-2016 03:18 AM

It's not clear what to think but something caused a 5.1 magnitude tremor at a known North Korean weapons test site.

North Korea carries out 'successful' hydrogen bomb test; 'Man-made earthquake' suspected after tremor - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

ContentPimp 01-06-2016 04:23 AM

세 두 하나 KABoo00OOM

wehateporn 01-06-2016 04:31 AM

To be fair, it's self-defense, he knows The West have plans for NK, look at what happened to Gaddafi who got rid of his weapons and made deals with Western nations, eventually they sent in a proxy army to put a knife up his ass

Sednub997 01-06-2016 06:19 AM

Yea they won the soccer world cup beating Brazil in the final too

pimpmaster9000 01-06-2016 06:42 AM

N/Korea is a terrible place no doubt. But one can not blame them for wanting nuclear weapons when you take in to account the mass murder and terrorism committed by the USA in the region. The USA has dropped more bombs in the region than the total for WW2 and WW1 combined.

Whether they have the h-bomb or not is only a matter of time. Like it is for other countries. Soon the 3rd world will be able to defend itself from the cancer that is US foreign policy.
The USA bets 500 billion$/year against global peace, it is called the US """""""""""""""""defense""""""""""""""""""" budget :2 cents:

HeadPimp 01-06-2016 07:27 AM

Even if you argue that North Korea has reason to be paranoid, it is not a justification to perpetrate crimes against humanity to their own people...

wehateporn 01-06-2016 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeadPimp (Post 20690816)
Even if you argue that North Korea has reason to be paranoid, it is not a justification to perpetrate crimes against humanity to their own people...

They don't want to use it on their own people, it's just a deterrent

ilnjscb 01-06-2016 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20690785)
N/Korea is a terrible place no doubt. But one can not blame them for wanting nuclear weapons when you take in to account the mass murder and terrorism committed by the USA in the region. The USA has dropped more bombs in the region than the total for WW2 and WW1 combined.

Whether they have the h-bomb or not is only a matter of time. Like it is for other countries. Soon the 3rd world will be able to defend itself from the cancer that is US foreign policy.
The USA bets 500 billion$/year against global peace, it is called the US """""""""""""""""defense""""""""""""""""""" budget :2 cents:

We agree that the US defense budget is a bloated conduit to the pockets of liars. Regardless, conflating the US government with the people of the US is incorrect, as you and I have hashed over many times.

Serbia is closer to NK than the US. Chaos won't do anyone good. The response to global nukes will be worse than the nukes themselves.

2MuchMark 01-06-2016 08:15 AM

Scary stuff.

Austin - MrSkinCash 01-06-2016 08:30 AM

In all honesty it really isn't the United States problem. Even if they successfully tested a hydrogen bomb they still lack the resources to be confidently capable of delivering such a device via ICBM.

Even if they did develop that technology competently, there is strong reason to believe the US has an even more capable and sophisticated missile defense network that would be able to shoot down the missile .

Furthermore, North Korea would never fire any sort of weapon at the United States not because we deter them but because China would roll in there and completely annihilate them if they did. The last thing a regional hegemon like China wants is to provide the US with a reason to send large military forces close to its borders. To date, China is the only friend of North Korea and even if Kim Jung Un is truly insane other military leaders are not and realize that launching any attack against the US is pure suicide for everyone in their country.

They can have all the weapons they want, the US is just going to sit back and wait for history to run its course and for the regime to collapse.

Sarn 01-06-2016 10:35 AM

in theory they do not need a rocket they have submarines
big nuke torpedo with kamikadze

ilnjscb 01-06-2016 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austin - MrSkinCash (Post 20690891)
In all honesty it really isn't the United States problem. Even if they successfully tested a hydrogen bomb they still lack the resources to be confidently capable of delivering such a device via ICBM.

Even if they did develop that technology competently, there is strong reason to believe the US has an even more capable and sophisticated missile defense network that would be able to shoot down the missile .

Furthermore, North Korea would never fire any sort of weapon at the United States not because we deter them but because China would roll in there and completely annihilate them if they did. The last thing a regional hegemon like China wants is to provide the US with a reason to send large military forces close to its borders. To date, China is the only friend of North Korea and even if Kim Jung Un is truly insane other military leaders are not and realize that launching any attack against the US is pure suicide for everyone in their country.

They can have all the weapons they want, the US is just going to sit back and wait for history to run its course and for the regime to collapse.

I hope you're correct. Unfortunately, I have one of my few agreements with Marco Rubio on this subject, i.e. "I have been warning throughout this campaign that North Korea is run by a lunatic who has been expanding his nuclear arsenal while President Obama stood idly by," the Florida Republican said in a statement issued late Tuesday night."

Trump's opinion "Kim is "getting too close to doing something."

I don't blame Obama or Clinton as they do - did anyone read that this started in 2003 when W was in office?

What bothers me is the vector. 12 years from beginning to small hydrogen warhead. You know he'd sell one to ISIS for $500m, right? China doesn't control them.

2MuchMark 01-06-2016 11:38 AM

I don't think the US has to worry about NK flying an H-bomb over, but South Korea on the other hand is probably shitting their pants. If Kim Jong Un attacks someone with it though, it's all over for him.

galleryseek 01-06-2016 11:44 AM

Uhm, ever hear of the shit they do in Saudi Arabia? ..our great allies.

Ferus 01-06-2016 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20690441)
North Korea Says It Successfully Conducted Hydrogen-Bomb Test

While you dims on the left and right howl for Assad and call white men terrorists, North Korea, the only state to threaten the US with a fuckin nuclear bomb in 20 years now actually has the most powerful kind, almost small enough to mount on an ICBM.

The human rights abuses in NK far exceed anything Assad or any other Arab state has ever dreamed of. And a nuclear bomb will do a lot worse than peacefully occupy a building, it will roast you right in your safe spaces.

Stop being nut licking cuck sycophants and think for yourselves.


Can you be more of a stupid sheep? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dyna mo 01-06-2016 11:47 AM

Nk has sent astronauts to the Sun, you can bet they have hydrogen nukes too.

PR_Glen 01-06-2016 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20691147)
Nk has sent astronauts to the Sun, you can bet they have hydrogen nukes too.

would be kinda hilarious if they just took advantage of an actual earthquake and claimed it was a weapon just to sound powerful.

Penny24Seven 01-06-2016 01:31 PM

They just showed the H-bomb and how it compares to the atom bomb dropped on Japan and the blast is so much bigger with the H-bomb. It almost didn't compare.
It was like a coaster size ring and the H-bomb was a big beach ball.

just a punk 01-06-2016 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20691056)
in theory they do not need a rocket they have submarines
big nuke torpedo with kamikadze

As I've supposed already, you have never been to army, and you have no idea how the strategic weapon works. Am I right?

romeo22 01-06-2016 03:14 PM

If true its not good for the mankind

j3rkules 01-06-2016 06:27 PM

Beloved Leader Fat Dum Pling would be piss-yourself funny.................. if he weren't real!

Poor, poor N.K. people.

ilnjscb 01-06-2016 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferus (Post 20691144)
Can you be more of a stupid sheep? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

no, you've got that covered

HeadPimp 01-06-2016 08:02 PM

I honestly wouldn't put it past them. Realistically, we can detect the spike in radiation even from a ground burst.


Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 20691152)
would be kinda hilarious if they just took advantage of an actual earthquake and claimed it was a weapon just to sound powerful.


TeenCat 01-06-2016 08:39 PM

only idiots live there btw :2 cents:

$money$ 01-06-2016 08:40 PM

that would be a crazy place to live North Korea

MiamiBoyz 01-06-2016 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $money$ (Post 20691689)
that would be a crazy place to live North Korea

About the same as the USA actually...the only difference is that they admit that it's all manipulative propaganda where as Americans THINK they actually have some control over what happens in their lives and that the government serves them when it is actually completely the opposite. :1orglaugh

Spunky 01-06-2016 09:44 PM

Charley scares me

baddog 01-07-2016 12:33 AM

I think they had an earthquake and said it was a test.

seeandsee 01-07-2016 03:37 AM

ICBM that would not penetrate USA coast anytime soon

Sarn 01-07-2016 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20691286)
As I've supposed already, you have never been to army, and you have no idea how the strategic weapon works. Am I right?

Do you think someone in the army understands it?
http://s00.yaplakal.com/pics/pics_or.../6/4113652.jpg

just a punk 01-07-2016 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20692154)
Do you think someone in the army understands it?

That's a part of a standard course. I'm not talking about regular draftees. Those are a cannon fodder and they are not supposed to think. But if you have any officer rank, you should know that a nuke can not be used this way, because a navy nuclear blast will kill a few tons of fish and maybe a few fishermen ships in the bast case. It can be used against enemy carrier battle groups and especially their subs, but it won't hurt the continental area. Ok, maybe a wave of tsunami will destroy a first line of buildings on the coast, but no more than that. To be used effective, a nuke must be blasted in the atmosphere above center of the target. Only in this case all four destructive factors will be used: a shock wave, a thermal injury, a penetrating radiation and EMR. There are special tables which show the dependence of all those factors in accordance with the blast's power and its height.

P.S. Actually you should partially learn these things even in your school during the life safety and NVP courses. Here is a picture from a Russian school book to refresh your memory ;)

http://konspekta.net/lektsiiimg/baza...s/image541.gif

Sarn 01-07-2016 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20692198)
Ok, maybe a wave of tsunami will destroy a first line of buildings on the coast, but no more than that.

if make a big bomb, insert it into the submarine, fit it to the shore and explode - big wave washed away a thin strip of the industry that are mostly located on the coast. and there will be no radiation - a place will be available for life.
http://earth-chronicles.ru/Publicati...nami_video.jpg
can also initiate a nuclear charge eruption of an underwater volcano = big tsunamy etc...

just a punk 01-07-2016 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20692328)
if make a big bomb, insert it into the submarine, fit it to the shore and explode

No. It won't work like this. Here is how an underwater nuclear blast looks in the real life:



It's can make a wave of 13 meters which is enough to sink a small ship, but nothing else.



Another one:



Man I have posted a picture from the old good NVP book. Did you learn it when you were a schoolboy? Do you really think this shit may somehow hurt someone on the shore? How old are you?

P.S. If you didn't know, Russian anti-ship tactical nukes have to be delivered by cruise missiles (e.g. "Базальт", "Гранит", "Вулкан") and they always detonate above the target battle group. That's the only way to efficiently destroy the enemy.

wehateporn 01-07-2016 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 20690441)

While you dims on the left and right howl for Assad

I can guarantee you Assad is a good guy, all the bad stuff we hear is simply propaganda :2 cents:

Sarn 01-07-2016 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20692346)
Man I have posted a picture from the old good NVP book. Did you learn it when you were a schoolboy? Do you really think this shit may somehow hurt someone on the shore? How old are you?

P.S. If you didn't know, Russian anti-ship tactical nukes have to be delivered by cruise missiles (e.g. "Базальт", "Гранит", "Вулкан") and they always detonate above the target battle group. That's the only way to efficiently destroy the enemy.

CyberSEO I read a lot a lot a lot of books in my life and this too. you read the book program officer I see it))
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/&#1057...ич
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Sakharov
the author of the hydrogen bomb Andrei Sakharov (Nobel Peace Prize (1975) :1orglaugh) developed this project with tsunami.

NATO is a maritime country, and with the explosion in the Atlantic all the cities and the country will wash away.

bronco67 01-07-2016 11:29 AM

I think they had an earthquake and saw it as an opportunity. Experts have already stated the tremors were not big enough to be caused by a hydrogen bomb.

just a punk 01-07-2016 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20692418)
the author of the hydrogen bomb Andrei Sakharov (Nobel Peace Prize (1975) ) developed this project with tsunami.

http://cdn.meme.am/instances/65010540.jpg

Once again: how old are you? Educate yourself.

To make a tsunami like the one that did hit Japan in 2011, North Koreans (or whoever) will need to blow up a couple thousands of nukes near the US coast at a same time. This is possible in theory, but absolutely impossible in the real life (guess why?) Also even that super-uber-mega tsunami in Japan has killed "only" 15 thousands. I say "only", because it's really nothing that can be done by a couple thousands of nukes used in a proper way (RTFM). So please don't post your childish bullshit about nuclear kamikaze sub. It's so lame.

just a punk 01-07-2016 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 20692418)
NATO is a maritime country, and with the explosion in the Atlantic all the cities and the country will wash away.

FYI, NATO is not a country.

Sarn 01-07-2016 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20692468)
Once again: how old are you? Educate yourself.

To make a tsunami like the one that did hit Japan in 2011, North Koreans (or whoever) will need to blow up a couple thousands of nukes near the US coast at a same time. This is possible in theory, but absolutely impossible in the real life (guess why?) Also even that super-uber-mega tsunami in Japan has killed "only" 15 thousands. I say "only", because it's really nothing that can be done by a couple thousands of nukes used in a proper way (RTFM). So please don't post your childish bullshit about nuclear kamikaze sub. It's so lame.

it's not my project, this project Sakharov and Mathematical Physics Faculty of Moscow State University.
and oceanographic ships built for a joke.
http://topru.org/wp-content/uploads/...B5-720x340.jpg
and who knows what happened in Japan? if now in North Korea only recorded earthquake. In Japan, too tsunami was triggered by an earthquake and the Fukushima radiation disguised. but whoever confesses in this?
hydrogen bomb - It has a capacity of 100 megatons. We experienced only version 50 megatons.
thousands bomb have capacity of 100 000 megatons.
riddle: when the explosion of the tsar bomb - the earthquake was 5,0 (on ground) - what will be an earthquake in the explosion of Mt 100,000.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20692479)
FYI, NATO is not a country.

is a military block captain obvious. your education too bad :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc