British Film Destroys Official 9/11 Story
 

Fuck, at first I read only the title of the thread and I thought finally something interesting is coming out about 9/11, but then I saw your nick next to it, and I immediately knew that its gonna be some BS :)

Wow, I was just going to post the same exact thing. Or at least something very similar.

The reporter was fed info by a dumb ass in London, she spouted it our without knowing what building it was.

Conspirators have to be a lot better to get away with crimes.

I love talking about 9/11. To date I have yet to see anything that remotely disproves the official story.

See, because it's the British version of Loose Change, that means it's better, right?

because British intelligence is well known and respected

I stick with the official story but to say these "truthers" do not have reasonable evidence is complete bullshit.

They make too much sense actually.
Only an idiot can't see that building 7 was brought down by demolition.


:2 cents:

OP's link is for a video only about #7 ... pretty interesting.

Anyone who believes the official report is in denial. Building 7 wasn't even mentioned in the The 9/11 Commission Report. wtf.

The official report about Building 7 has no lies in it:2 cents:

What is it about you truthers that makes you all waffle on for hours.

Two hours? Seriously?

The goverments said it so must be true.
Goverments want help us. :upsidedow

Building Seven. Sigh. It fell for no reason at all. I mean, if you ignore the fact that it was on fire for hours, suffered through two earthquakes when hundreds of tons concrete and god only knows what else, not to mention on the third floor it was physically connected to one of the towers.

Perhaps next you will bring up the "strange explosions" from the basement. I always love that one.

These engineers and about 2000 others call bullshit on building 7.
Think they know a little more about the subject then most webmasters.

World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? - Who we are

Come on, you know that even if it was going to fall in some way it wouldn't have fallen like that, so perfectly, there's a reason why the controlled demolition industry exists, there's a reason why they get paid so much and spend days wiring up these buildings. You've had this explained so many times that I can only draw the conclusion that former soldiers are being paid to push the official story online.

It would make more sense for you to say "Well it was clearly wired up for demolition and has been for many years as there was top secret info in there" that would at least keep you in the debate

lol @ rochard. I have never seen anyone who has been conditioned this succesfully by a government. Mr. "I have nothing to hide!"

It's like you are turning on a random American news* network whenever you read one of his posts.

*propaganda

conspiracies and truth aside... that video debunks nothing. It's a nifty video pulling at people's emotions in full successful attempt to gain views and profit.

In now way does this video replicate the 9/11 scenario.

Any explanation on building 7?

The Building 7 case is fishy for sure

unattended fires escalate...

Only two thousand people? That's a pretty small number isn't it? I mean, if you figure 1% of the US population is retarded, and the bottom 10% shouldn't be allowed to drive.... Two thousand people is a very small number indeed.

Those 2,000 people are all smart and have studied the evidence, most people haven't or aren't engineers

Not people, 2000, engineers.

With all the buildings in the world for all these years, can you provide one example of where a building went into free fall from damage or fire without demolition?

That would help prove to skeptics what happened.