Delegate Count both Dem's And Rep's
 

AP Delegate Count,100

The Associated Press Updated 7:09 pm, Saturday, February 20, 2016

DEMOCRATIC

----------Changes----------

Total ElecDay 7days 30days

Clinton 502 +19 +110 +145

Uncommitted 177 0 -31 -32

Sanders 70 +15 +26 +62

O'Malley 0 0 0 -2

Others 0 0 0 0

Needed to nominate..: 2,383

Total Delegate votes: 4,765

Chosen thus far.....: 749

Yet to be chosen....: 4,016

REPUBLICAN

----------Changes----------

Total ElecDay 7days 30days

Trump 55 +38 +38 +55

Cruz 11 0 0 +11

Rubio 10 0 0 +10

Kasich 5 0 0 +5

Bush 4 0 0 +4

Carson 3 0 0 +3

Fiorina 1 0 0 +1

Huckabee 1 0 0 +1

Paul 1 0 0 +1

Others 0 0 0 0

Needed to nominate..: 1,237

Total Delegate votes: 2,472

Chosen thus far.....: 91

Yet to be chosen....: 2,381

thanks for this

That's so completely misleading. Fucking media sucks Hillary cock.

I know there are many that still think this is a simple election process.

So here is a recently published up to date scoop on the current delegate rules.

Everything you need to know about delegate math in the presidential primary - The Washington Post

After SUPER-TUESDAY, you will want to take a close look at those numbers again.

But if the election is to be based on popular vote, then there should be one delegate per congressional district and the winner of that district should get that delegate.

The whole process seems to support the insiders. Even though it has been turned a bit on it's head this time around despite the rules. Which I find quite remarkable.

The parties are not regulated by the constitution or anything, they're free to create their rules, and they do. Those are publicly available. The republicans just changed theirs to allocate delegates proportionally initially, then after March 15th they're all winner take all by state or congressional district. Once the nominees are in place, the process is regulated, but to arrive at their nominees parties have a self-governed process.

Nothing like a Lewinski throwback.