The real reason why Govts are supporting Gay rights.
 

First off, I could care less who marries who in this world. If gay people want to marry each other and be just as miserable as straight people, then knock yourselves out.

With that, the increase in States supporting Gay rights and our Fed Govt supporting Gay's rights to marry, in my opinion is not due to "humans treating other humans fairly"...

I think the real reason is simple, More Gays = less new humans being born = saving social security liabilities.

The more the Gay community can be cultivated, pampered and socially accepted, means new generations of Gays and future growth of the Gay population will increase annually.

As decades pass, more and more young people, confused and bewildered by sex over exposure from the internet will also lend itself to the increasing Gay population as young minds are easily confused. The damage of young boys at age 8 (average age now of young boys seeing porn) seeing adult penises in action will only damage their sexuality and the increasing fear and anxiety of the opposite sex will reinforce their "I must be gay" personalities.

The new "Gay generation" will be very trendy and socially acceptable. With that, as the Gay populations increase, the less children will be born due to the increase of Gay married couples. Not a lot, but a small decrease in the future population, and let's face it, if the Govt can save 2 or 3% annually from Social Security, from humans that will never be born, it's money in the bank.

Plus Gays are great for the economy, they have more disposable income because most don't have children strapped to their wallets.

So according to the Govt, more Gay couples and marriages = fewer children being born = saving money on future Social Security liabilities and a boost to the economy.

yes, I know, it's probably one of the most ignorant things you've ever read, but when it comes to Governments, there is always a financial reason behind everything they do.

Remember when they raised Social Security retirement age higher than the average age a black man dies? Saving money! Now it's... OK to be Gay and get married! While Govt saves even more of that juicy Social Security money. :thumbsup

You are wise beyond your years
 

I would like to wear those and take a poo in them, however they are a bit small for me... :(


I miss out on all the fun... :(

Hmmmm, this gay thing seems A-OKAY, so you are saying I can keep all my money to myself?:thumbsup

Where do I signup?!:2 cents:

The reason isn't population control. The reason is because it's 2016 and we're no longer a country ran by Bible thumping hypocrites (mostly) . It's not like there's a factory in San Francisco churning out homos by the truckload. They're born that way, and will never breed regardless if homosexual marriage is legal or not.

Nah...you are overthinking it.

From your point of view :2 cents: :2 cents:

There is one minor flaw in your theory. Gay people were gay before they were allowed to get married. Personally, I don't subscribe to the theory that people choose to be gay. You were born gay or not. Allowing gay marriage isn't going to suddenly create more gay people.

Still, allowing gay people to marry, in theory, might actually create more births because these days may gay couples are adopting. The more people adopt the, potentially, more women will consider putting a baby up for adoption as opposed to having an abortion.

So it is possible your entire theory is actually backwards.

no it is because jesus and socrates were both queer and they are the foundations of western society.

Who actually puts pages from jazz mags up on their walls?

couldn't care less

As conspiracy theories go this one doesn't rate very high.

Actually it's the other way around. Pensions need more young people to support the retirees

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Are you sure?

http://mattforney.com/wp-content/upl...1-1024x768.jpg

Well of course if gay people couldn't marry each other they'd be off making babies instead. It all makes perfect sense.

I was thinking about this theory before and one bad thing comes out of it:
gay agenda is being pushed only in western countries where populations are mostly decreasing (or sustained only by invaders).

The biggest threat to overpopulation of the world is arab, african, paki and similar countries where birth rates are booming.
And trust me, they are not pushing much gay propaganda.

So basically this method would work if it was implemented in the right countries, not in declining white population countries.

Wrong.

Homosexuals are the byproduct of heterosexual breeding, as are retards, freaks with missing limbs, people born with both sex organs, human tails, clubbed feet, webbed hands, baldness, third nipples, vaginal slime syndrome, etc.

Also, the new generation coming into political power realizes that the more people who live in a country that promises "liberty & justice for all" but delivers that basically only to whites or those with a lot of money, the more people you'll have not giving to the system but rather trying to dodge it, throwing it over, or leaving the country all together.

the "gay rights" agenda is being pushed by the establishment for only one reason: To get the demographic who find this important (gays and non gays) on their side when all else fails. It's just a simple tool for them to get more support from a specific demographic. When they don't need support from this group they don't push it.

Error in your logic....

Capitalistic Economic model is all about one thing: Growth! So... even if less people = spending less on Social Security.... it also means: less tax income for Governments with what they would pay for, for example, Social Security.

Try again:thumbsup

probably the most stupid thing that someone posted on this forum, and this mean a lot:winkwink::winkwink:

it is exactly the opposite way as already few sober people reminded

It's just because capitalism is gay ...

I stand corrected. :1orglaugh