Indexation of Streamate White Labels?
 

Question for those with a Streamate white label. I understand that Streamate has robot .t x t set to protect it's own brand against the duplicate content issues that come with hosting all those white labels with identical content.

White labels still used to rank though based on brand names (URL minus the h t t p and .c o m part) and other close variations.

Recently, few days ago, I discovered Google does not even display the white label anymore for brand names. I checked other white labels as well for this and all seem to have vanished.

Is your white label still ranking for its own brand name? I see a direct correlation with the decline of sales during the same period.

I would have second thoughts as well if I have to go out my way to find a site to make a second visit.

I see plenty ranking in google, have you checked your google webmaster tools or has your robots.txt been changed?

I never bothered to include my property in webmaster tools until just now. And I'm not talking about the complete URL. Just brand names. Below are a couple examples of white labels (not mine) with Google not returning the most relevant result. It completely leaves the main URL out.

This started happening only from a few days ago. I can't post URLs yet it seems


imgur . com/dEpRhFy

imgur . com/OMEYFgn

imgur . com/LuboPvR

Why they should rank sites that have no unique content (thin content with little or no added value). They all are going to be hit sooner or later. It is very fair.

I agree partially there. I think that sites with duplicate content should not be ranked for keywords related to the content that's duplicated.

But that's not the main issue here. If Google's aim is to display the most reliable and relevant results, then it's not doing its job.

These are visitors who are specifically looking for a site by using its brand name, rather than the URL. Some sort of direct traffic you could say. And what does Google do in this instance?

Completely wipe out the most relevant result for their search query.

Google don't returning relevant result because don't need to do this!

I check firs site and is completely fine

site:amplecams.com

give over 30k indexed sites.

Now try "amplecams", "shegotasslive" and "mypornstarcams" alone without quotes or . c o m.

I can explain to you why for a "brand-name" keywords site is don't show on the top position in Google, in 99%

what is a brand name everybody know -
"ADOBE" is a brand name correct? On this example "mypornstarcams" is a brand name. So brand name called "mypornstarcams' don't have any value for Google, why? Too many links or no links, Penguin 1 2 3 4 or Hummingbird, human-made filter or punish for duplicated content (In my opinion can be this). As long you see your site by site:DOMAINNAME is not a ban or deindexation.

Nothing more to say about this connect site to google webmaster tools and check information :)

Yes, I know it's not deindexed or banned. Maybe I should have worded the thread differently. It just doesn't rank anymore for brand names, which sucks and will cost white label owners organic brand traffic and sales in the end.

I can only imagine the damage for sites such as youjizzlive, pornhublive and xvideoslive. Same happened to them.:mad:

Hopefully it's just temporary.

If your sites indexed try building some links to it using the brand name, it is hit and miss I've got some of my whitelabels ranking for the brand name and others don't seem to.

I do a small research and i think all whitelabels from Streamate get kick in the ass.

Same Ip, same content, same dns.

Yes, something happened on tuesday. From pos 1-4 to 55, still ranks no 1 for sitename dot domain, that is all I really can ask for.

Exactly at the same time two of my hand-made API sites sending traffic there literally doubled, so sales are still up. It must have been some kind of algo change.

what do you expect from duplicate content sites on same ip?

Well depends ! One of my streamate WLs is getting more SE traffic than ever , the other one I have don't get much traffic but never did !

Court Won't Order Google To Lift Manual Block For 'Thin Content' ICF v. Google

http://cases.justia.com/federal/dist...?ts=1428853147

Welcome to 2016 (this was over 2 years ago).

All white label products are not SEO products. Everybody's ...