New Federal Rape Case Filed Against Donald Trump
 

A previous case, with a different woman, with forced sex claims, was settled.

This is a new rape case against Donald Trump:

"Trump forcefully removed (Harth) from public areas of Mar-A-Lago in Florida and forced (her) into a bedroom belonging to defendant?s daughter Ivanka, wherein (Trump) forcibly kissed, fondled, and restrained (her) from leaving, against (her) will and despite her protests.? In the court document, she said that Trump bragged that he ?would be the best lover you ever have.?


"Defendant Trump stated that I shouldn?t ever say anything if I didn?t want to disappear like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant Trump and that I had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having my whole family killed."

The second declaration is even more astonishing, because it is signed by ?Tiffany Doe?, Mr. Epstein?s ?party planner? from 1991-2000. Tiffany Doe says that her duties were ?to get attractive adolescent women to attend these parties.? (Adolescents are, legally, children.)

Tiffany Doe says that she recruited Jane Doe at the Port Authority in New York, persuaded her to attend Mr. Epstein?s parties, and actually witnessed the sexual assaults on Jane Doe. SOURCE

--------

Trump has said many times publicly that he doesn't settle lawsuits. Why did he settle the previous rape lawsuit?

wow that's some article.

On one hand I want to say this pure bullshit. Why would anyone wait so long to press charges?

On the other hand, I said the same exact thing about Cosby.

Trump and 12 year olds...seems like hilary is spending some of that money on her campaign...

google has no idea what you're talking about, there are no settle rape cases involving Trump, according to Google.

https://www.google.com/search?q=trum...hrome&ie=UTF-8

also, the article you link was written by gloria allred's daughter, she's using her article to prosecute and find Trump guilty, based on 3 reasons, the primary reason being her claiming Trump's a misogynist. the 2nd being her clinging to Ivana's esl comprehension of English and the 3rd reason from an anonymous source who claims she actually sat around and watched the rape 15 years ago.


i don't like Trump but that article is poor.

Damn man... Google " Jill Harth "...

Ah what the hell, I feel generous today

Exclusive: Inside The $125 Million Donald Trump Sexual Assault Lawsuit | LawNewz

https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/1ki...cd0b6271fe.jpg

I have him blocked for a reason. He's a time waster, with multiple nicks here, and not in adult.

Great research though! All he had to do is click on the article for references. Again, he's a fake negative time waster here :2 cents:

thank you for your generosity, from your article::::::::::

The court record indicates it was ?voluntarily dismissed? but ?without prejudice,? meaning she could have re-filed the case. The timing is interesting because at around the same time the case was withdrawn, Trump reportedly agreed to settle with her husband?s company, The American Dream Enterprise, according to an obscure 1997 gossip article in the New York Daily News which appears to be the only mainstream media coverage of either suit.

American Dream Enterprise had filed a breach of contract lawsuit in 1995 against Trump which was apparently peppered with Harth?s allegations, according to the Daily News. LawNewz.com reviewed the court docket from the breach-of-contract case and it does indeed show that the affidavits of George Houraney and Jill Harth were both ordered sealed in September of 1996. There are no other accounts of what was contained in those sealed affidavits.

LawNewz.com spoke briefly to Jill Harth in an interview last week. Harth wouldn?t? discuss the settlement or much about either lawsuit. When asked about the allegations, Harth told LawNewz that she was ?under duress? and ?pressured? to file the case. But when questioned about who applied that pressure, she wouldn?t say.

So were the sexual harassment allegations true? Harth says: ?The allegations were twisted and embellished. Everything could be looked at in different way.?

Harth, who now runs a beauty business, says she?s put the lawsuit behind her, and get this, she says

she?d even vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming election ? what she calls ?supporting a friend.?


ahahahahahaha

thanks sherlock the creepy clown stalker.

When it comes to believing or doubting a story like this, you have to look at the details. Does it seem like something someone would make up? Does Trump seem like the kind of guy who needs to force himself on a woman (little girl in this case)?

I say no and yes to those questions.

Trump publicly degrades women. The nasty personal attacks on them says a lot about where his mind is. He seems like the kind of guy that's had every fantasy fulfilled, and he's talked about dating his daughter.

I'm an innocent until proven guilty guy, and it's not like yet another rape case is the worst thing he has to worry about right now. To me it's just another thing to consider, not the end all and be all. He did settle another rape case, though he states he never settles litigation, so why settle that one?

Jesus H. Christ, I was pointing out your incapacity to use google, not who settled for how much and why its details are sealed. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Did you finish last in your rat race? What age group was it in? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

paul markham without jigsaw puzzles

and i was pointing out your post makes no point at all. that article in fact confirms what i posted, google has no fucking idea about a settled rape case.

keep squirming about my winning. and heads up, there's plenty of room at the top, maybe you'll find that out one day, ask your illegal drain declogger for more, since you seem to think he's da man.

again, there are no settled rape cases according to google. nascar posted an article about a case being voluntarily dropped and not one word about a settled rape case.

At least Paul has worked in the industry for decades, and won industry awards, and worked for some of the biggest names in the industry. DynaMp AKA JoshuaG doesn't work in the industry at all and continuously insults Paul Markham too, as well as Amelia G, another long time, high profile industry name.

It's almost as if his multiple nicks attack everyone on GFY that are actually in the industry. I've never seen him be continuously negative to anyone that's non industry.

creepy gay stalker alert.

i'm sure nascar sent you his adult industry resume. i mean, he had his illegal immigrant worker send it to you.

threads like this will make early november sooo sweet. none of you dumb libs will be posting here, for at least the rest of the week after election day. what will you possibly say when the rapist sexist homophobic midget hating draft dodger wins the white house?

too busy looting CVS & blaming trump, i presume...:1orglaugh

def bladewire will be rioting, no doubt...

Of course it was settled and sealed. Just like many others. NDA enforced. Just stop posting.
"voluntary dismissal without prejudice"... Google that and name Michael Jackson. You are getting old and boring. Take a break from internet.

right on nascar!

i'm sure now you get your astute legal views from your illegal esl legal beagle legal team

ruh ro...some emo is becoming unhinged again :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

exclaims the guy that incessantly needs to post in purple and nitpick semantics to think he's relevant at teh GFY.

didn't expect this to happen

Dismissed without prejudiced means held in abeyance: Abeyance - Meaning, definition, usage of abeyance

18 USCS § 3283

That Federal case can be refiled.

Seems you're wrong.

What does this mean?

So you don't know how to use Google. No surprise.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058...form=hootsuite

Filed and real. Whether or not Trump is allowed to settle this out of court and pervert the course of the law. Is up to him. But the mud will stick.

Getting people to sign a document telling them what to say to the press. Is just a matter on $$$$$.

There's also this...in no reality does any female think Donald Trump is physically attractive. Just ask any woman. Not only will they tell you he's not attractive, but might add he's about as repulsive as it gets.

I'm saying his looks (and persona) are the number one leading cause of vaginal dryness.

Captain Defender of the Assholes, to the rescue with 70 pt. text.

I've never defended you, asshole, so you're a fucking liar. And you're too fucking stupid to figure out I'm defending reality.

I would piss on you if you were on fire, but not where the fire is.

Dear logic reject clown, you just claimed in your post there is no settlement in that case.

You're even a hack at being a troll.

No, I'm right as usual. You fucking clowns couldn't Google your fucking way out of a paper bag

Again, logic reject clown, there is not a settled rape case against Trump according to google.

yea, a billionaire with unlimited gold diggers to choose from would need to rape women... :helpme:error

Asshole, the entire story is conjecture. You and Markhamhack and NASCAR don't know what that word means so I'll tell you-

It means it was made up opinion based on missing details. And heads up asshole: just because you don't like the way Trump looks doesn't make him guilty of rape. Youre like the 8 year old in animal farm.

The guy spent his days wiping his old mother's ass so that she would pay his bills. That's about all you need to know about Dyna Mo. :1orglaugh

for all you need to know about candyflip





https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...candyflip.html

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...iper-punk.html

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...-stealing.html

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...g-designs.html

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...and-feeds.html

Andrew Luster?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Luster


I take no side this discussion; just pointing out flawed logic.

Regardless of any truth -- Trump will walk -- the suit will be dismissed I think;

http://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.h...=108&page=2149

The statute of limitations was up to 25 years of age in the fall of 1994.

We haven't even got to the final election year run of the fall this year :2 cents:

You don't wanna piss off CandyFlip man he'll start telling people your name and where you and shit and will likely knock on your door :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Brainwashed idiots like you believe any negative fabrications about the one you are conditioned to hate, so no surprise.

Vote Hillary! Four more years of war! :thumbsup:thumbsup

http://www.luciferfilms.tv/propagand...m_mohammad.jpg


i like millions of islam immigrants in western society, i am detached from reality! :)