Why VR will not work for porn - but also it will.
 

VR porn will both work and will not work.

This may sound rather odd thing to say, but I will explain.

First why it will not work.

VR porn will not work if its filmed, as in someone films a girl stripping on a VR camera.

Well the reason why this will fail is because the VR already is about being interactive.

While for a sort time it may gain interest, the fact that at most you will just have the option to move your head will limit the VR experience.

With computer games people will have the ability to move around, under, over an object as well as move it.

They will then see a VR porn film rather dull.

It is unlikely they will want to see the floor or want to look at a wall when all the action will be in front of them.

The file sizes will probably be huge too.

BUT...

VR porn will work if its software based.

You will then have the ability to interact with the model. Move her, have sex with her and so on.

It would give unlimited possibility's and options. As AI improves it may even mean you can chat to her and have a conversation.

It also allows people to go further and have sex with such as an alien babe (as you see in Star Wars). Or change the look of the model (big boobs, small boobs).

The file sizes would I suspect be small than those with films.

It may even be possible that you have VR sex with real people. The next level of web cam models could be models who have (as you see in films) sensors on there bodies to track them, while the data it transferred to a VR version where it turns people can have sex with her. But not only that people can choose to watch them both in VR world, or watch from the viewpoint of the person paying (so they have a VR experience on a smaller level), or just watch the model live on webcam.

For VR Sponsors See sig!

VR is software based. 360 view pornography is not VR. It seems you have the two confused.

Either way, dating is a really good supplemental source of income right now.. :2 cents:


(VR is going to be huge and will only get better, though, you're thinking about it wrong.. Think less interactivity and more like having a much better interactive view. The interactive fucking a model with VR is slightly different, but does also have a big following like Otaku, so promote both.)


Yeah, what he said..

Just get one of these and skip the whole VR nonsense :1orglaugh

http://g03.a.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1IJW5J...latex-love.jpg

While you say that, most (if not all) VR porn sites are simply 360 or 180 or whatever view porn.

I wonder if anyone is as yet doing VR porn softwear?

While it isn't a truly interactive experience yet (think camgirls with VR webcams) there are some very good scenes. I saw a scene the other day where the setup is a guy is waking up from a nap and three girls are all over him. They shot it in a way that the girls are very close and make very good eye contact. They even whisper in your ear and lean in for a kiss. You don't get to interact with them, but the viewing experience is amazing. It is an immersive experience which is what a lot of people are looking for.

Down the road I think there will VR camgirl shows and there will be a marriage of VR and physical goods that allow you to experience the action and feel like you are right there.

Right now we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg. VR is going to be huge in porn.

Correct.

You can't have VR without 360 view.

You can have 360 view without VR. There is nothing virtual about moving your device to change your viewing angle of pre recorded 360 content.

Virtual reality definition:

An artificial environment which is experienced through sensory stimuli (as sights and sounds) provided by a computer and in which one's actions partially determine what happens in the environment; also : the technology used to create or access a virtual reality.

While that may be true, the problem is that VR is already at interactive in computer games.

I am not sure once you have your mind blown away with the full VR computer game experience (just think of the sound alone made to sound different as you move around) how dull its going to be to just watch a model using a VR headset. I wonder if people will simply prefer to watch it on a screen in HD.

the way her legs are angled turn me off

VR isn't nowhere near it's potential.

We are probably a few years away before seeing some pretty impressive stuff and mass adoption.

Once Teledildonics come into play VR will be made a truly immersive experience.

Technology will be pushed towards Augmented Reality & Mixed Reality pretty soon meaning girls will be appearing in you're actual reality apposed to a virtual environment.

If anyone does want to jump on the VR train early check out:

VR ADULT DOMAINS | Domain Shop

Got some good niched Adult VR Domain Names that would be ideal for various projects.

I also wonder if with VR recorded films people will get RV motion sickness.
With VR software if say I lay down, the image should also go sidwards as it would in real life (if that makes sense).

But I suspect that may not happen with VR film (I may be wrong), but at the very least if I move my head a bit, what I see will not adjust. By this I mean I can look up and down, left and right, but the object will still be the same. An example is I look at a door frame. In the real world, a slight movement of the position of my head will and I will see the frame slightly different. In a computer VR game I will too. But a recorded VR film it remains the same. Thus I wonder if it may result in some sort of motion sickness.

It may not affect everyone. I used to have a strange unplesent feeling moving around when I played doom. But I do not think most people felt it.

I wonder if you would simply feel contempt for yourself using it, instead of being with a real woman.

Also her knickers look to have been put on the wrong way round.

But the pleaser I get from a woman is putting my fingers inside her and feeling how wet she is and listening to her moan. I just could not find this at all exciting.

Part of the VR EXPERIENCE is the immersion that you feel a bit more that you are there. That is not possible without 3D/stereoscopic images.
Making it feel a bit more real is a ongoing advance of all the media and it is no different with porn.

This is true of interactive porn whether it is all VR-CGI or a VR WebCam interaction. Or with porn toys that are network connected to the experience.

It will evolve in steps getting better as time, tech, allow and where it stops is anyone's guess.

But there is money to be made along the way, there is no denying that. Each step of the way.

I prefer the real deal but it would be interesting living out a fantasy or two which I think everyone seeks.
I think that drives part of the porn market in general.

The question is not if it's going to work as it seems to be doing it already even though the hardware is just enough to do it in a reasonable way but how soon before it advances to the next level.
We all can see where it is going, but when ?

One other factor is that if its softwear based it will not be on tubes (just like computer games are not on tubes).

It then becomes more likely that firms will make far far far more money selling VR porn softwear than shooting it as a film.

In fact we may see like with youtube people uploading what they see and do (when they play the vr softwear) to porn tubes, which rather than being a negative should be seen as free promotion in the same way games are promoted on youtube in this method.

Good point.
But I will point out that there are tube sites where one watches others game play and they are quite popular with the under 30 crowd. Some games have the ability to record the gameplay just for it. Some stream it live.
Imagine that in VR Porn.... Voyeur Max

Very hard to say what all this might encompass unless you know everyone's fantasy's.
Where there is a demand for it, it will be for-filled in VR, because it can be.

Thats my point.

If people did live broadcasts or recorded what they were seeing on VR the VR softwear they purchased, people would want to purchase to try it for themselves.

But this goes back to my above post. Think if webcam models did sex shows with themselves turned into VR animated model (that looks like them) and people then had sex with them in a VR world. People could both pay to have sex with her as well as watch the action of two people in VR and also her live (some may want to see her on webcam in real life as she does sex in VR).

Then add the next dimension such as gang bangs in VR with her or even a few webcam models.

While these shows may be recorded and uploaded to porn sites, I bet people watching will want to go view the model and even take part.

But at the same time, the more people opt and enjoy VR porn in this format, the more recorded VR films will simply suck.

While it might pale in comparison to the interaction of a video game, to me it still can be a superior experience compared to a regular video. The technology is still young so the video quality of VR movies isn't as good as traditional HD videos, but that will improve with time. Also, it will be hard to make a porn movie that is as interactive as a video game with the exception of a cam girl with VR webcam. Which could be a big upsell for the industry. Like the VR video, now hook up with a camgirl for a fully interactive experience. It is hard to compare the two because they are two very different forms of entertainment. It is like saying, "Watching a movie is not as fun as driving a race car." Well, sure, driving a race care is probably a blast, but it is a different thing than watching a movie.

However, what can make VR a superior experience to a regular porn movie is the immersion of it. With a regular movie it is still just a movie you are watching on a screen. With VR you can feel like you are in the room. It is more intimate and the good scenes are shot in a way that make you feel like you are part of the action. If the choice is to watch a video where a girl bounces on some dude's dick or watch a VR video where the girl makes eye contact, talks to you, whispers dirty things in your ear and it looks like she is bouncing on your dick, I would choose the later pretty much every time. We shouldn't be comparing VR porn video games, we should be comparing it to regular porn.

VR has a lot of hurdles to jump including the high cost of hardware, but I think it can be something special and I think it is going to be very popular in the porn world.

The potential issue with a webcam model doing a live show then turning it into VR animated model a person can interact with a fuck, is that it is then an animated model. I have no interest in that. I know there are people that like anime and 3D computer model cartoon porn, but many people don't I have zero interest in interacting sexually with a cartoon even if it is an animated version of a real person.

However, a guy with a fleshlight (or some other toy) could have interactive live sex with a camgirl in VR.

The tech aspects of having a full body scan of all/most possible positions is being worked out.
The name of the company that was first escapes me right now.
But I'm sure it is a expensive venture for now because it is the same method being used to generate REAL actors in Hollywood movies and computer sports games.

But it also allows for some selection of acts within the flick since it is all computer recorded actions of choice with the pre-recorded video overlay on the positional co-ordinates.

The idea is you choose the act and can then pick a model that appeals to you for the finished touch. And have choices along the way.

It remains to be seen in a delivered product but, just so you know, it's out there. Probably to much CPU power required for the computer market as it now stands.

Could make a appearance within 2 years.

My thought is the girl (webcam model) would have been digitized.

So when you see her in VR she would look the same (give or take) as she would in real life.We see films even ten years ago where the animation looks so good you can be fooled into thinking your watching a real person, not a distressed person.

While the software and hardware to do this at the moment, I do not think it would be long before you could purchase this as a low cost commercial price.

I could see gamers wanting it so they could scan themselves into computer games, so when your fighting someone in a game linked to the web, you would see what they look like for real.

Of course the big problem is going to be for models, as once they are scanned in. You do not need to scan them ever again as the digitized 3d version of them can them be put in all VR software porn you ever make.

Yes

The cost will come down.

And they may find simple and lower cost ways to scan people in.

I would imagine that scanning software is not cheap and you need some pretty impressive hardware to run it. Like you say, that will change. I just wonder how long it will be.

Personally, I think the future of VR is going to be POV semi-interactive videos (think the choose your own adventure stories where you select the scenario or what you want to do during the scene then it happens) working with a device or devices that are connected to your computer that will stimulate your body as the action happens. If you could lay back on your couch, dick a motorized fleshlight kind of thing, probes on your nipples to stimulate them and go through a semi-interactive scene with your favorite pornstar it would be a hell of an experience. I think we are pretty close to having the technology available and affordable for something like this.

If you have ever seen how they do it in Hollywood, the cost is high only because it is a time and labor intensive task doing 3D scans and doing them right. And then the CGI folks have to clean them up frame by frame.
For a 10 minute scene, it may take 5 folks several weeks of long days of work.
I'm sure you could hit Youtube up for some how-it's-done videos.
Look at the ones they do for the Sports games. They use the most modern low cost techniques that are applicable for cinematic VR.

I've seen a number of videos showing how they do this and it is interesting and could have a place in VR. The problem is, as of now, for it to look very realistic is a time consuming and expensive thing. I was just playing Madden football on the Xbox last night and those players do look like the real players, but they also look fake and you can tell they aren't real. I don't think the masses will flock to truly interactive porn with a CGI character unless that character really looks and moves like a real person. We are likely still a ways away from that.

so much misinformation by people who have not even tried it...

and i guess there is nobody that says that VR has reached its peak in features already

but dismissing VR video now is like inventing the wheel and then waiting for somebody to invent a race car before using them

I miss VHS...

You have posted this....

I of course would feel contempt... But you are selling virtual sex over the internet as if it was real , just read your own OP....and then lecture me !! I am looking forward to somebody recounting the great sex they had with the VR gear on their head while the model levitated into his bed...:)