Trump on Losing"It's OK""I'll go Back to a Very Good Way of Life" Take a Long Vacation
 

He's definitely ready to throw the election :2 cents:

Another attempt at throwing supporters under the bus by basically saying"You'll be screwed but I'm gonna have a great life and very long vacation" :1orglaugh

---
"Look, all I do is tell the truth," he said. "I'm a truth-teller. All I do is tell the truth, and if at the end of 90 days I've fallen short because I'm somewhat [not] politically correct even though I'm supposed to be the smart one and even though I'm supposed to have a lot of good ideas, it's OK. I go back to a very good way of life."

"Just keep doing the same thing I'm doing right now and at the end, it's either going to work or I'm going to, you know -- I'm going to have a very, very nice, long vacation."

At least he tried ...

One of the things I've never understood is why someone who is so old would want to be President. Once past 65 or even 60, it's time to slow down and start relaxing and start thinking about retirement. The last thing you want at that age is to high stress job that requires 14 hour days six days a week.

Don't tell me Trump - or even Clinton for that matter - is so damn patriotic that they are doing this "for their country". I don't believe that for a moment. And they surely aren't doing it for the money either.

Trump would want the power to obtain more wealth & mitigate his legal downward spiral.

Clinton wants the power to elevate the country & make us stronger. Her & Bill as a team can really catapult us beyond what we've ever been as a nation.

:1orglaugh

He could buy an island and retire with his wife.... I know I would.

Power is a very seductive thing.

I've wondered that too.

I think it is one of 2 things: 1) If you are a politician, like any job, you climb the ladder of success to try to make it to the top.

2) If you are very rich and old, you are probably bored. Your business doesn't excite you anymore, you've been everywhere, seen everything, etc. Why not run for president?

Great points! For Trump it will give him something interesting to talk about the rest of life "remember when I was in Miami on stage and..." Trump DEFINATELY doesn't want to sacrifice the next 4 years. He doesn't have the discipline or desire :2 cents:

He should stay at Joshua's parents house

I am sure they only have one spare cot in their room. Where would Joshua sleep?

He threw it the moment he looked like getting the nomination.

Especially if you're someone who loves getting attention.

Are you fucking high?

#MentallyHill

You are fucking retarded. Please don't vote.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/7LYRUOd_QoM

The "News" are a conglomerate of businesses subject to sucking in profits, at any cost.

https://youtu.be/bq2_wSsDwkQ

They are masking their paid ads ('attack pieces too') as news. They are paid ads

https://youtu.be/E_F5GxCwizc


Don't get confused. The 'facts' are stretched at best, most of the time they are outright lies. Clinton is a career criminal. Like the rest of the do nothing politicians in D.C. on both sides of the isle.

Is trump your perfect image of a statesman? No. But those guys have been ass ramming all of us for years. So fuck them and anyone who is dumb enough to believe they want to lift the country.

Johnson and Ward should run for CONgress. There they might actually do good. In reality, they will just make it easier for HRC to get elected.

But hasn't that always been the case?

I just don't get this.

I used to be a hardcore Republican. I joined the US Marines under under Reagan. "We are going to beat the communists". But I was stunned at what happened during the Whitewater investigation. Somehow a small investigation into a an investment in Arkansas ended up with the President being faced with lying under oath or admitting in front of his wife (and the rest of the world) that he had cheated on his wife? At what point in time did our government become more interested in trying to make a President look bad instead of doing their job?

Clinton is a career criminal who has been investigated countless times, yet never been charged with a crime?

Obviously how the emails were handled at the State Department is a huge concern to the Republican party. And it should be. Why aren't we looking into other secretaries of state who had a similar email set up? Why aren't we investigating Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice?

I demand an investigation into why we haven't had an investigation into Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice and how they handled classified emails when they worked at the State Department.

Do people still vote for this oaf?

cnn and abc poll show oposite

Well, Clinton is a politician and a criminal. I honestly can't find a good reason why Trump (a hard core business man) would want the job. So I think he really does want to better the country and he's right about ISIS on the whole.

He was complaining about the direction of the country for many years before his presidential bid. I think he would shake things up if he got in because he would break the chain of boring and predictable, disasterous presidents.

If I had to choose, I would vote for Trump.

I know right? How many times do we have to hear that fucking "I joined the marines" shit.

Holy crap you are delusional

"Obama is the founder of ISIS" - Donald Trump

"The point is, you can never be too greedy." - Donald Trump



----

Of course he'll go back to his "very nice life", because it's all about him.

He thinks he has nothing to lose, each man for himself, same mentality as Bush2.

Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, Trump! One less demagogue we need to worry about.

And... I just don't get this. She is a criminal? Has she been convicted of a crime? Has she been charged with a crime? We sure have had a lot of investigations into her, and yet no proof of any criminal activity.

I was thinking about all of this today while I was exercising.... The Republicans are saying "Clinton works for the big banks". Um.... That's a joke, right? Clinton gave some speeches. On the other hand you have Trump who pretty much dominates the larger banks and has for decades. Who is crooked?

I can't wait for Clinton to debate Trump. He is sooo out of his league.

(Actually, I think he might quit before or make some reason not to attend. He's got to know it will be brutal.)

Wow so you know more than the FBI , CIA and 20 years of investigations into Hillary Clinton that have proven her clean & innocent time & time again. You're smart , or brainwashed 👍

Sorry to break it to you but every poll I've seen that isn't controlled (ie. someone is given a list of names and numbers to call) show Hillary's support is a reflection of her rally turnout. What the establishment pollsters want us to believe and the real numbers are opposite. Two polls I've seen in just the past 24 hours show Hillary head to head with independents Stein and Johnson. These are people actually anonymously selecting a choice as they would in a voting booth.. Clinton is going to get slaughtered if she doesn't get a lot of dead people behind her.

A lot of the Clinton Foundation goings on look very suspect. Clinton certainly doesn't appear to be clean but that still beats a racist and bully with the maturity of a 12 year old.

So dozens of polls by established pollsters are faked?

Faked? somewhat.. Such as admitting they are adding and subtracting percentage points due to circumstances such as the conventions rather than re-polling. Then you have to consider the bias behind the pollsters themselves. Most of these pollsters are diehard establishment.

Every poll that I've seen from established companies in the last couple of weeks show Trump badly behind. Not "margin of error" behind but closing in on landslide behind.

:thumbsup fixed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi

Rank Leader: of ISIL


Military career:


Jamaat Jaysh Ahl al-Sunnah wa-l-Jamaah
(2003?2006)

Al-Qaeda
(2006?2013)
Mujahideen Shura Council (January 2006 ? October 2006)
Islamic State of Iraq (October 2006 ? April 2013)


Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
(April 2013?present)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islami...and_the_Levant

Established under the name of Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad: 1999
Joined al-Qaeda: October 2004
Declaration of an Islamic state in Iraq: 13 October 2006
Claim of territory in the Levant: 8 April 2013
Separated from al-Qaeda:[2][3] 3 February 2014[4]
Declaration of caliphate: 29 June 2014


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jama%2...whid_wal-Jihad

Leaders Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
Became Flag of al-Qaeda in Iraq (2004-2005).svg Al-Qaeda in Iraq

The group started in Jordan in 1999, then became a decentralized network during the Iraqi insurgency (2003?11) with foreign fighters[3] and a considerable Iraqi membership.[4]

Following al-Zarqawi's pledge of allegiance to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network on 17 October 2004, the group became known as al-Qaeda in Iraq or Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn.[2][5][6][7] After several rounds of name changes and mergers with other groups, the organization is now known as Islamic State (IS).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden
1st General Emir of Al-Qaeda

Military career:

Maktab al-Khidamat (1984?1988)
Al-Qaeda (1988?2011)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maktab_al-Khidamat
The Maktab al-Khidamat, also Maktab Khadamāt al-Mujāhidīn al-'Arab (Arabic: مكتب الخدمات or مكتب خدمات المجاهدين العرب, MAK), also known as the Afghan Services Bureau, was founded in 1984 by Abdullah Azzam, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri to raise funds and recruit foreign mujahidin for the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan. MAK became the forerunner to al-Qaeda and was instrumental in creating the fundraising and recruitment network that benefited al-Qaeda during the 1990s.[1]

During the Soviet-Afghanistan war, MAK played a minimal role, training a small group of 100 mujahidin for the war and disbursing approximately $1 million in donations from Muslims sourced via a network of global offices in Arabic and Western countries, allegedly including approximately thirty in the United States. MAK maintained a close liaison with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency through which the CIA and the intelligence agency of Saudi Arabia Al Mukhabarat Al A'amah funneled money to Afghan Mujaheddin. The MAK paid the airfare for new recruits to be flown into the Afghan region for training.[2] MAK was closely cooperating with Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin faction of the Peshawar Seven.

Connections in the United States[edit]
MAK established recruitment and fundraising offices in many Western countries, the United States being one of their main fund-raising destinations. On his fundraising tours Abdullah Azzam visited the mosques of "Brooklyn, St. Louis, Kansas City, Seattle, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego - altogether there were 33 cities in America that opened branches of bin Laden and Azzam's organization, the Services Bureau, in order to support the jihad."[14]


By one account approximately 200 ?young Arab Immigrants? went to see Shalabi about fighting in Afghanistan. Once enlisted, the prospective jihadists would be organized into groups of three or four and instructed to ?pay their own way?. However, before leaving, the recruits were given arms and combat training; one such recruit was El Sayyid A. Nosiar, who received rifle training at the High Rock shooting range in Naugatuck, Connecticut.[15]


etc... :1orglaugh

Care to share the links to these polls?

Clinton is a boogeywoman created by Republicans who have lost two presidential elections. They need something to lay the blame on for all of their own failings. The new thing is Mike Pence is starting an investigation into the Clinton Foundation. They haven't even lost the election yet, and already starting their usual bullshit of working against everyone and everything because they didn't get to sprinkle the nation with trickle down economics again.

Polled people 18 to 24 probably

The amount of people who attend rallies has nothing to do with who is going to vote. I have no desire whatsoever to attend a CLinton rally, but I know for a fact that I will be voting for her -- or it's actually more of a vote against Trump. The entire voting public has better shit to do than attend political rallies.

The reason Trump's rally turnout is so high is because it's a circus everyone wants to see. Does that mean all of those idiots are going to vote for him?

By the way, the thing that Trump is so good at (getting amazing rally attendance) is ultimately the thing that will do him in. When you watch him doing his thing at a rally, you see a guy who is getting high off a drug. He commands crowds of retards with his sophomoric humor and rambling non-insights, and loves every seconds of it. This is what he's living for at the moment. But it's also the thing that can't stop him from being his own worst enemy. His need to keep mouth-breathers entertained is eliciting tons of unforced errors that are completely his own fault. He can't blame the media for putting a camera in front of him to record exactly what he says, then run it on the news.

Already shared one in this thread https://gfy.com/21100027-post29.html It should be noted this is the second recent round of abc twitter polling both with similar results. Also note that if you don't vote it shows Hillary as winning.

Another
https://www.isidewith.com/poll/801555698

Aren't those just online polls where anyone with a computer can vote? Those are almost never nearly as accurate as actual polls done by professional polling companies.

You mean like 538 which their bias and fudging of the figures has been discussed in my thread?