so how many dude constitute a gangbang? 3+ or 4+
 

need to know. dont ask why!

Potato :2 cents:

i think 4

at least three

the number is tres.

this :thumbsup

if you look at 80's porn they called as few as 2 a gangbang but now I think it's Potato

3 is a foursome, so 4+. The more the scene the better it sells.

Can't believe I'm saying this: I agree with Paul.

at least four :winkwink:

I would have said three, I've always assumed that a foursome was two guys and two girls.

a foursome is usually considered 2 couples. A Gangbang is anything from 1 girl and 3 guys upwards or 2 girls and 3 guys.

And of course, for a gangbang there must be sex or if only blowjobs & not fucking, it's a bukkake :2 cents:

this as I mentioned above also :thumbsup

I would say 3+.

I think four top guys (plus one sub, female or male), if only to differentiate from an orgy which would have to consist of 3 + 1 in order to differentiate from a threesome.
A note on orgies, while we're here: I've seen far too many videos billed as "orgies" where it's really just two couples keeping to themselves. All four (minimum) MUST participate as a group, or at the very least switch at some point (lame orgy) in order to qualify.

I'd say 4. 3 is just really busy :)

Brad

4+ :thumbsup

Paul is right 4+

Simple question - if you saw three guys walking down the street, would that constitute a "gang"? No, so the answer is four.

you need 4+

8 ? :winkwink:

Five or more ...

if you're going to say this, 2 people can begin a gang. & yes, if you see 3 lads outside of your home, you would say, a group or a gang of lads were outside my home.

Don't get me wrong, I know the more the merrier is a gangbang. Personally, when I've had a gangbang, it's usually been 7 or 8 guys and me, sometimes even 12 :2 cents:

I wouldn't. Group yes, gang no. Gang has to be at least four. You've heard of the "Gang of four", no? But you've never heard of the "Gang of three" because there never was one.