Donna Brazile did it again
 

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2016-03-05 21:16
Subject: One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash



Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.

Folks, I did a service project today. It's so tragic. And what's worse, some homes have not been tested and it's important to encourage seniors to also get tested.

maybe they shoulda asked clinton how a black liberal democrat was the emergency manager that made the call to switch the water source that caused the lead pollution...

Ex-Flint emergency manager says he relied on experts in water crisis - CBS News

but the liberals blame the governor, because he is white male GOP.

:1orglaugh

I read the news articles today and it's pretty obvious that Donna Brazile was feeding Clinton information. This has also come up before.

On one hand it's pretty obvious that someone in the position of Donna Brazile should be able to guess most of the questions that will come up. Pretty much anyone can. However, in this case it seems like she had very precise information.

However, what does this mean? Where was Donna Brazile getting this information from? Isn't it her job to figure out exactly what the questions for a debate will be? I would just assume that there is a group of people somewhere in the DNC that tries to figure out this information in advance. I am sure the Republican side has the same. Seems to me this is one of the things a political party should do.

If the debate committee gave Donna Brazile this information, well, that looks bad for the debate committee - which is obviously supposed to be impartial.

You just keep on trying to rationalize it all and I'll keep on sitting back and lmao :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Perfectly rational to know a person with a rash will ask about flint lead poisoning... without being fed it prior

I don't need to rationalize anything. I have a choice between the lesser of two evils, and it's a pretty easy decision for me to make. You have one candidate who has never been charged with a crime, and another candidate who is going to trial for fraud and then seventy-one other cases directly after.

As for Donna Brazile.... That's part of her job. The DNC obviously wants to know what the questions will be in advance. The debates play a huge part i the election, and they put a lot of effort into debate prep. I am sure they had people dedicated to guessing what the potential questions could be. I am sure they invested a lot of time and effort trying to get close to people who knew the list. Both sides do this. They would be stupid if they didn't.

Looks like Donna is heading for the welfare line with her peeps

CNN cuts ties with Donna Brazile after she leaked questions - NY Daily News

How are you this mentally broken? How is this even possible?

So you are saying I am wrong that the DNC and RNC isn't remotely interested in getting the debate questions in advance?

Both the RNC and the DNC have people already plotting out 2020. The RNC has a list of candidates it can run or might be interested in running, and they have a list of Democrats that might be running against - and they have lists of the strengths and weak points of all the candidates on both sides. The DNC does the same.

I'm saying you are hilariously mentally broken because you hand wave away every single negative thing that comes out about Hillary Clinton. I'm convinced Hillary Clinton could literally stab you repeatedly in the face with a rusty spoon and you'd explain it away as being a good thing that you totally deserved. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What do I "wave away"?

The nine investigations into Benghazi, all of which ended with "no wrong doing"? The email investigation, which lead to no charges?

And now we have this.... Again, no laws broken. No charges.

Congratulations to the Republican party - They just created the most vetted candidate in history.

I am not a Hillary supporter. I said all along they went the wrong way about handling Hillary. Instead of trying to make her "look bad" they should have hit her on her lack of record. Hillary claims she has been in politics for "thirty years" but yet what has she accomplished? She was a Senator and a Secretary of State - but can anyone name anything she's ever accomplished? Not a god damn thing. She has not accomplished a god damn thing. Instead they tried to make up bullshit scandals like Benghazi and emails, things that make her look slightly bad to the Republican base, only serve to piss off independents who see this our government trying to make a Presidential candidate look bad, and in the end there are ever any charges.

There are people like me who expect our people to do their job. Instead we get this bullshit of nine investigations into a terrorist attack, which was obviously an attempt to make Hillary look bad.

If it was anyone other than Trump I would most likely be voting Republican this time.

I don't think Hillary is great. Or even good. She is "just better" than Trump.

Ok. you're either a troll or a fucking liar then.

There's a reason she spent most of her career under investigation. It's starts with a "C" you can ignore it just like she did all you want. Still doesn't change the fact.

He lives in the state of denial.

He was a marine and owns a truck.