if you support hilary but dont read wikileaks, you are sarah palin
 

It's ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

hey rochard...denverpost says you are sarah palin, & you do not support an informed public.

you dont even support an informed rochard. :1orglaugh

You seem to be getting more desperate every day - Is this some sort of breakdown?..

The only person other than Sarah Palin that is Sarah Palin, is you Josh'.

#Hillary2016

Hey dumbass, that is a letter to the editor. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

I think it's creepy that WikiLeaks is a bunch of stolen documents from a server that was hacked into and then plastered everywhere.

Thats like someone hacking into into my phone and taking all my dick pics and posting them everywhere. weird.

Also with what I heard so far theres nothing bad. Some snide comments in emails, who cares?

lookey lookey ad hominem attacks...

that means they are attacking me personally instead of listening to the message.

looks like calling liberals sarah palin hits them in their liberal G spot.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

A big reason for Assange never to be trusted again.

Assange said on multiple TV interviews that he had nothing against Clinton: he lied each time

Assange said multiple times throughout the election that the next release was HUGE with end game info: he lied each time

Nothing bad? She revealed the names of undercover opperatives in the middle east who were killed. Shes corrupt beyond reproach. Clearly you have not been following along

a number of liberal sarah palins have flocked into my thread.

thank you altman for your contribution to the advancement of knowledge. :1orglaugh

Give me your details and I will start a GoFundMe page for when Trump loses...

Do they pay for therapy?....

It is end game info. The mainstream refuses to run it. All the media, npr etc are donors to podesta group. Even pbs is a cuck like mark prince to the current admin and hillary. This stuff is huge. Come on bladewire. Dig in to this stuff. It's un fucking believable.

In private emails that were stolen?
Its her fault she was hacked?

And what about Trump's missing emails?



Donald Trump’s Companies Destroyed Emails in Defiance of Court Orders

http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.news...800-x-2400.jpg

Or the Republican's 22 MILLION missing emails made on a private server during wartime?

The George W. Bush White House ‘Lost’ 22 Million Emails

At least Hillary showed up in court to explain herself. Trump & Republicans dont even go to court, they run out the clock.

They really are sleazy for coming down hard on her when they were much much worse, and know it

yeah you dumb clown. the classified emails WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE ON A PRIVATE SERVER WHERE THEY COULD BE HACKED. she is responsible for handling them...hence the felony crime of "mishandling" classified intelligence...

do you even know she took a sworn oath with the FBI, separate from her job oath, pledging to legally protect classified intelligence? no you dont.

holy shit you libs are dumb!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Do you have a source for that? I can't find it.

I have read the wikileaks stuff. I think it might have made them look better. They are super squeaky clean. Think of someone getting every email you have sent. Nothing even that snide or offensive.

Says the guy who thinks a letter to the editor is actual news.


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Low T Altruistic Losers Seldom Dig In. ...It's Much Easier to be an Emotional Based Nellie!

.

you cant form a coherent thought that gets past 2 sentences.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

No... pay attention. She sent these names as secretary of state. A classified email to a non classified recipient.

Maybe you should find comments in the news section of the Denver Post and create threads about them.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

now you cant form a coherent thought that passes 1 sentence...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Admit it, you don't know what a letter to the editor is.

all that matters, is information. not how you get it.

http://66.media.tumblr.com/043e80c50...3wso1_1280.jpg

:winkwink:

do you liberals understand the word "information" ?

the first part is inform...something that increases wisdom, knowledge.

the second part is formation...forming info.

information, whether it from a newspaper, or a letter to the paper, the source is irrelevent. just as it does not matter that a criminal hacker got the emails. the information itself, is the key.

hence, the dumb liberal worries about HOW the information is gathered, not the content of the information...suckonthis has not uttered 1 single word on the information of post #1, that a hilary supporter that does not read wikileaks is ignorant. this is a undisputed fact.

dumb lib. :1orglaugh

That's a lie.

The truth:

"A handful of emails forwarded to Hillary Clinton's personal server while she was secretary of state contained references to undercover CIA officers ? including one who was killed by a suicide attack in Afghanistan, according to U.S. officials who have reviewed them.

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton's server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails ? references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release."

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcne...ndroid-verizon

when watergate broke, did liberals worry about where woodward/bernstein got their information? no. just the information mattered.

todays dumb lib says wikileaks is not a legitimate source of information. to deflect from the information itself.

that sounds like hypocrisy.

:1orglaugh

You have serious character flaws, this is one of them.

You are a baby being fed by something that wants to make you destructive to your own best interest, and you don't care what's in the food, how it was obtained or who's feeding you as long as you keep eating.

546 comments, looks like it's quite a popular piece.

But if the message is the harsh truth, just whine about semantics like you libs do :thumbsup

The most incriminating thing in the wiki leaks emails is a risotto recipe:

7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump | Mother Jones

Double post for Risotto lovers

So you didn't read any of the wikileaks then?

bro..

hello chris. this one time i will help you with this. mother jones is a great source of information. a great place to go when the president is a GOP. opponents are always much better critics than the allies.

in this case, all of the media that has a liberal slant has decided to cover wikileaks by publishing the non-controversial elements of the email dumps. this is a method of mis-informing consumers of the liberal media, who dont yet know its slanted, into thinking nothing harmful is in the wikileaks. i assure you this is not true, & the liberal media is lying & misleading to you.

see, you have to read the wikileaks yourself, in order to be informed. you have to go beyond mother jones, if you want to inform yourself. its like exercise, you dont want to do it, but you are stronger & better for it.

but im certain, based on your comments, that all i wrote was too intelligent & abstract for you to comprehend. so please do reply by name calling, or deflecting, or otherwise changing the subject.

:1orglaugh

That must make the OP Trig