Poor states overwhellemly support Trump..
 

If you look on the map, the obvious thing is aside from say Texas, all the states that support Trump are full of poor people. This can also be said for Republican support as well. Typically these states don't have high percentages of college educated people and jobs are typically under wages of middle class or at the very low rung of the middle class.

ElectoralVote

I think it shows that these people are not well informed and are more gullible than people who have better educations and higher paying jobs. Even Texas has low wages (like FL) but it's only the oil industry which props it up.

Why do poor people support Trump/Republican party while higher earners and college educated people support Democrats? Things that make you go hummm..

because globalists support anti-american policy for that pay good.
Welcome in new world :1orglaugh
http://a4.files.biography.com/image/...U4NTc3NDIy.jpg

Actually these same states have voted Republican or Democrat for years. What it shows is states which favor democrats tend to do better economicly..

Ie fair wages with more people earning allows the economy to do better. Vs the Republican motto of a few high earners trickling down on the masses..

What Trump needs is for that Gary guy to quit and come out in support of Trump. His 6% could mean everything right now, although I just saw one poll showing Trump ahead.

Trump Lead Widens To 2, His Biggest Yet, Despite 'November Surprise': IBD/TIPP Poll | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

The election has always been in Hillary's hands to win or loose. Trump wouldn't even be a bump in the road for someone like Obama or former Bill Clinton. Hillary was a horrible mistake by the DNC and I've always said this..

Sanders would have out right curb stopped Trump he was the better choice by far. The only reason it's even close is because Hillary is almost as bad as Trump..

notice how this was ignored by the rabble.

Who says if Gary was to drop out Trump would pick up his votes?

Zippy cannot compute hard data. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Fell off the roof early today did yea?

The data comes from people being asked in person how much money they make.. Do you really think people are honest about that? :1orglaugh

Do you really think they are gonna say.. yea I voted for Trump and I make $10/hr at the gas station.. :1orglaugh

I think Trump is closer to libertarian than Hillary but Gary would have to come out in support of Trump.

Even just 1% of his 6% could make the difference at this point.

If Johnson had supported Trump it would go aginst everything he claims to be about..

Trump wants a more intrusive govt, wants to grow the military and go after things like porn..

Also Johnson is not a Republican so why would he endorse another party?

Gary Johnson can't stand Trump, he's compared him to Hitler. Not to mention his running mate has all but endorsed Clinton.

Except for the fact that the poor actually favor Hillary.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B05qpjmCQAATuqC.jpg


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...060c22e101.jpg

• College grad or up
  
• Under 35K

I'm guessing those degrees in women's studies didn't pan out.

Or African American history.

exactly. what that chart shows is that failures support clinton.

Based on the demographic data it would appear more like that HRC basically counts on three groups:

- those depending on handouts
- minorities (that rely on affirmative action and support open immigration policy)
- "trendy" people that are in many cases educated yet at the same time unable to challenge the current mainstream narrative / government, those who worship the current status quo because they're taught to do so and can't imagine otherwise

Poor little fella, so much hate :(

What could make even more difference would be if Johnson as a candidate actually got space to articulate his views. And Stein also.

Imagine having somebody cultured like Gary Johnson as a part of the debates.

You have the incredibly fake Clinton that would be, in a healthy political climate, disqualified to run for any kind of office. Then the Donald who's notorious for self destructing on stage. And then somebody cultured with actual track record of getting things done. That is what could already make a difference.

Also imagine all the TV channels would ONLY have to broadcast original materials, original speeches. You'd have no "commentaries" "breaking reports" no smart asses telling everybody who to vote for and what to think, none of that.

Just each candidate with the same coverage, in his own words, his own program, his own rallies, his own debate performances.

Yeah because the candidates would never lie and wouldn't need anyone fact checking them.. Dream on.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

This chart is about "who do u think is going to win" here's one on Trump voters demographics - http://politicsthatwork.com/blog/trump-supporters.php
Unless you hot your education at Trump U, educated people are less likely to vote for Trump. 12clicks is your prime example

Actually they are full of smart people, Hillary is a dumb cunt..

No it's a poll with one of the questions being that and other demographic questions asked. As with every poll. Thanks for proving your poor ignorant status.

the system has fucked them over and Clinton will continue that.

oh look, one of the rabble explaining how his betters are less educated.
hahaha, seriously dude, look around the shit hole you live in before explaining how dumb someone else is.:1orglaugh

Come see my shithole in Aruba for Christmas. I may have a roofing job for you. :1orglaugh
Betters my ass, jersey boy :1orglaugh