GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Electoral College vote on Dec 19 will prevent Trump from being Prez (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1228471)

TCLGirls 11-12-2016 12:30 AM

The Electoral College vote on Dec 19 will prevent Trump from being Prez
 
...possible? Probably?

Bladewire 11-12-2016 12:38 AM

Nope. Not even a chance really, their's a great article explaining mathematically why, I can't find it right now.

I think it's the wrong thing to do unless Trump does something wildly fucked up that both sides find astonishing.

gnawledge 11-12-2016 01:11 AM

I think the majority of people wish upon a star too much. He's president, people have to like it. I endured Obama for the past 8 years. I put my big boy pants on and went through life.

Brent 3dSexCash 11-12-2016 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21294601)
Nope. Not even a chance really, their's a great article explaining mathematically why, I can't find it right now.

I think it's the wrong thing to do unless Trump does something wildly fucked up that both sides find astonishing.

Not only that, but Congress would have to approve it which is never going to happen. I am not a Trump supporter but these protesters are a pathetic bunch of self entitled losers. You lost . Get over it and move on.

Bladewire 11-12-2016 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brent 3dSexCash (Post 21294631)
Not only that, but Congress would have to approve it which is never going to happen. I am not a Trump supporter but these protesters are a pathetic bunch of self entitled losers. You lost . Get over it and move on.

I agree. The media spoon feeding false hope of turning the electoral college is wrong, as is them blowing up the people protesting all day and saying Trump has to fix it.

The reality is Obama is currently president and needs to calm people and redirect their protesting to volunteering for organizations that are trying to fascilitate the change they want :2 cents:

Yanks_Todd 11-12-2016 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21294640)
I agree. The media spoon feeding false hope of turning the electoral college is wrong, as is them blowing up the people protesting all day and saying Trump has to fix it.

The reality is Obama is currently president and needs to calm people and redirect their protesting to volunteering for organizations that are trying to fascilitate the change they want :2 cents:

I agree with this mostly. Although I think this is Trump's chance via his actions and appointments to telegraph that things will be ok. Not sure they will be, but it would be pretty easy for him to telegraph what he might do.

I think his Obamacare stance has been thoughtful so far. I am not sure it will last, but is shows some interesting sides of him. My biggest concern is when he does go off the rails on twitter, Pence's influence and his ability to not get sucked in to policies written by the uber conservative think tanks. I think this is where HRC experience would help, he is way to busy to read and comprehend what he is probably signing off on.

bronco67 11-12-2016 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21294601)

I think it's the wrong thing to do unless Trump does something wildly fucked up that both sides find astonishing.

You mean like getting elected president despite being a narcissistic douche imbecile?

Grapesoda 11-12-2016 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 21294589)
...possible? Probably?

grow the fuck up asshole, trump won, so get the fuck over it and move on.

CaptainHowdy 11-12-2016 06:34 AM

https://media.giphy.com/media/l3vRnJ...ized-large.gif

ErectMedia 11-12-2016 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21294865)

:1orglaugh

ilnjscb 11-12-2016 06:38 AM

Not gonna happen. Trump won.

Colmike9 11-12-2016 07:46 AM

There have been 9 times in the past 100 years where someone in the electoral college voted for someone else, and has never affected the outcome.
Last time was when someone voted for John Edwards instead of Kerry for some reason..

JFK 11-12-2016 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnawledge (Post 21294628)
I put my big boy pants on and went through life.

Pics, or it didn't happen :Graucho

bronco67 11-12-2016 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colmike7 (Post 21294958)
There have been 9 times in the past 100 years where someone in the electoral college voted for someone else, and has never affected the outcome.
Last time was when someone voted for John Edwards instead of Kerry for some reason..

you have to admit...this is a very different situation.

Coup 11-12-2016 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colmike7 (Post 21294958)
Last time was when someone voted for John Edwards instead of Kerry for some reason..

That was me. I liked his stance on baby mamas.

mineistaken 11-12-2016 11:28 AM

Libby wet wishes...

Rochard 11-12-2016 12:28 PM

Anything is possible, but unlikely. You get Texas to switch over and there is a chance.

TCLGirls 11-12-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21295345)
Anything is possible, but unlikely. You get Texas to switch over and there is a chance.


Around 30 Republican electors would have to flip their votes to drop Trump to 269. There are already some Republican electors who have said they would not vote Trump. Flipping 30 might be doable. Kasich in Ohio, cCain in Arizona, and Graham in South Carolina might be able to flip some of their voters even without any help from Clinton.

ilnjscb 11-16-2016 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 21295351)

Around 30 Republican electors would have to flip their votes to drop Trump to 269. There are already some Republican electors who have said they would not vote Trump. Flipping 30 might be doable. Kasich in Ohio, cCain in Arizona, and Graham in South Carolina might be able to flip some of their voters even without any help from Clinton.

Such a pipe dream. These guys are party stalwarts. They'd need 37 or 38 votes and all they have is two and possibly three people who have said they wouldn't vote for *Clinton*. Not one republican has said they'd do it. Plus, that would amount to a coup. The House would vote Trump in.

If this is what the democrats are bringing I'm worried we won't see another presidency for 12 years or more.

crockett 11-16-2016 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 21294589)
...possible? Probably?

Russian Troll spotted.

charlie g 11-16-2016 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21295222)
you have to admit...this is a very different situation.

why is it a different situation? because someone lots of people hated won the election. the same thing could have been said if clinton won. people need to come to grip with the fact that they are going to have a president they dont like and who they think does not have the nation's best interest at heart. Welcome to the world of many millions of americans since 2008. hopefully trump will not have a shitty shameful record of that person. grow up and quit fucking crying.

2MuchMark 11-16-2016 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 21294589)
...possible? Probably?

Hopefully!

bronco67 11-16-2016 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 21305683)
why is it a different situation? because someone lots of people hated won the election. the same thing could have been said if clinton won. people need to come to grip with the fact that they are going to have a president they dont like and who they think does not have the nation's best interest at heart. Welcome to the world of many millions of americans since 2008. hopefully trump will not have a shitty shameful record of that person. grow up and quit fucking crying.

It's a different situation because the president elect is a morally and ethically bankrupt internet troll. Is that enough for you?

plaster 11-16-2016 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21305965)
It's a different situation because the president elect is a morally and ethically bankrupt internet troll. Is that enough for you?

Wrong...

Hannes 11-16-2016 11:59 AM

when liberals don't get their way...

Bladewire 11-16-2016 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21305965)
It's a different situation because the president elect is a morally and ethically bankrupt internet troll. Is that enough for you?

So true! He watches Morning Joe in the morning, as do I. If Joe Scarboroug is discussing Trump and Trump want to give input he'll tweet a response to the topic. Trump is a troll no doubt, for this and other obvious reasons :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

C H R I S 11-16-2016 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnawledge (Post 21294628)
I think the majority of people wish upon a star too much. He's president, people have to like it. I endured Obama for the past 8 years. I put my big boy pants on and went through life.

This.....

bronco67 11-16-2016 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnawledge (Post 21294628)
I think the majority of people wish upon a star too much. He's president, people have to like it. I endured Obama for the past 8 years. I put my big boy pants on and went through life.

What was so difficult about it? Was it the whole saving the economy from the Bush disaster thing? Or maybe you didn't like that thing where Osama Bin Laden was killed by a surgical commando team when Bush used a sledgehammer in Iraq costing thousands of American lives? Don't worry dude, an old white man is going back in to save you from the liberal hellscape created by Obama. Maybe he'll set us back a few decades and then you'll be happier.

woj 11-16-2016 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 21305782)
Hopefully!

You are hoping democracy will turn into even bigger joke than it already is? Do you even realize what you are hoping for? :error

Bladewire 11-16-2016 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21306154)
You are hoping democracy will turn into even bigger joke than it already is? Do you even realize what you are hoping for? :error

Majority rules is what they're hoping for.

The presidency is the only elected public office where they use an electoral college system for the winner.

All other elected offices in America that are not appointed are decided by majority vote.

I think people find it shady that a majority doesn't decide the most powerful office in the land, but 538 people do a month after people vote.

People from all over the country are in big population areas, it's not like they're in a born & raised big city bubble.

woj 11-16-2016 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21306163)
Majority rules is what they're hoping for.

The presidency is the only elected public office where they use an electoral college system for the winner.

All other elected offices in America that are not appointed are decided by majority vote.

I think people find it shady that a majority doesn't decide the most powerful office in the land, but 538 people do a month after people vote.

People from all over the country are in big population areas, it's not like they're in a born & raised big city bubble.

rules have been known before the election, election was held, people voted, winner was announced... seems pretty final to me, nothing debatable about it...

for next election there could be a debate and rules could possibly be changed, that's fair enough... but don't you think it's a bit nuts to even consider changing the rules for the current election after the fact?

this whole election drama is like attempting to change the rules of football after the superbowl, claiming "my team had more total yards, clearly they are a better team! they should be declared superbowl champions!"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc