The facts are in. GFY Climate alarmists
 

Introduction:

CO2 is not the tail that wags the dog. CO2 is a trace essential gas, but without it life on earth would be impossible. Carbon dioxide fertilizes algae, trees, and crops to provide food for humans and animals. We inhale oxygen and exhale CO2. Slightly higher atmospheric CO2 levels cannot possibly supplant the numerous complex and inter-connected forces that have always determined Earth?s climate. As University of London professor emeritus Philip Stott has noted: ?The fundamental point has always been this. Climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically selected factor (CO2), is as misguided as it gets.? ?It?s scientific nonsense,? Stott added. Even the global warming activists at RealClimate.org acknowledged this in a September 20, 2008 article, stating, ?The actual temperature rise is an emergent property resulting from interactions among hundreds of factors.?

Key climate data highlights:

Global temperatures have been virtually flat for about 18 years, according to satellite data, and peer-reviewed literature is now scaling back predictions of future warming
The U.S. has had no Category 3 or larger hurricane make landfall since 2005 ? the longest spell since the Civil War.
Strong F3 or larger tornadoes have been in decline since the 1970s.
Despite claims of snow being ?a thing of the past,? cold season snowfall has been rising.
Sea level rise rates have been steady for over a century, with recent deceleration.
Droughts and floods are neither historically unusual nor caused by mankind, and there is no evidence we are currently having any unusual weather.
So-called hottest year claims are based on year-to-year temperature data that differs by only a few HUNDREDTHS of a degree to tenths of a degree Fahrenheit ? differences that are within the margin of error in the data. In other words, global temperatures have essentially held very steady with no sign of acceleration.
A 2015 NASA study found Antarctica was NOT losing ice mass and ?not currently contributing to sea level rise.?
In 2016, Arctic sea ice was 22% greater than at the recent low point of 2012. The Arctic sea ice is now in a 10-year ?pause? with ?no significant change in the past decade.
Polar bears are doing fine, with their numbers way up since the 1960s.


https://www.cfact.org/wp-content/upl...ate-Report.pdf

That's a fake news site and a propaganda PDF with a virus you're linking to :2 cents:

That's a Nov 2016 UN Climate Report. :321GFY

I had a lot of gas today really.

It's going to be 69F(20.5C) Tomorrow 18, November -- I am 100km from the Canadian border in the US. It has been warm all week. The average Arctic temperature has risen 32F.

This *could* be a natural trend but the cause doesn't matter. This summer was hotter than usual -- sustained average temperature.

In the past 200 years we have stripped a large part of the forests on the earth that could absorb the CO2. World population was 1 billion in 1800 it is over 7 billion today.

That said;
That document is from Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) presented TO the UN by a private organization and not a report FROM the UN. Too bad you don't read well ...

2016 Will Likely Be the Warmest Year on Record, World Meteorological Organization Says

The problem it the Corporate Sector doesn't want you to believe in case they make less money. So they twist facts.

Forbes Welcome

Read it and then look at how the Earth works, very slowly in 10s, 100s or 1,000 year steps.

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/MWP.jpg

http://na.unep.net/geas/newsletter/i...11/Figure1.png

We could withstand those warm years with the tiny population.

The odds are with the lack of water for crops, cattle, and drinking, most of us will die.

bingo...this graph is the actual problem. global warming is merely a symptom of the bigger problem, population growth...

but today climate change is simply a vehicle to impose punitive taxes on corporations with no proof such taxes fix jack shit.

hence my problem with climate change dogma. its not focused on the true problem, & proposed solutions are irrelevant to the real one.

:2 cents: