GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Republican lawmaker wants to label Porn a Health Hazard (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1237051)

crockett 12-30-2016 07:04 PM

Republican lawmaker wants to label Porn a Health Hazard
 
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..


Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News

Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..

Bladewire 12-30-2016 07:18 PM

He's a copycat hack, Utah already did this back in April fucking hypocritical losers. :1orglaugh

Utah Declares Porn A Public Health Hazard : The Two-Way : NPR

bronco67 12-30-2016 08:02 PM

Men pretending to hate porn...always amusing.

crockett 12-30-2016 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21416287)
Men pretending to hate porn...always amusing.

It's the same as the Religious nutters whom torture themselves for their sins. Guys like this have been brainwashed into thinking porn is a sin yet he's probably obsessed with it. This leads him on a crusade because of his own demented mind.

It's the same with the anti gay Republicans. Every fucking one of them turns out to be a dick sucker. It's pretty much a given every fucking time.

Bladewire 12-30-2016 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416305)
It's the same with the anti gay Republicans. Every fucking one of them turns out to be a dick sucker. It's pretty much a given every fucking time.

https://i0.wp.com/fusion.net/wp-cont...-star-fake.png


Fake, but you know Pence is a pole smoker



Robbie 12-30-2016 09:35 PM

Right up there with the Democrats in California who are declaring fucking on video (making porn) a health hazard.

crockett 12-30-2016 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21416359)
Right up there with the Democrats in California who are declaring fucking on video (making porn) a health hazard.

Amazing you couldn't figure out how to blame Obama, yet you just love to lie and make shit up anyway.

The last Anti Porn bill in Cali was Prop 60.. It was solely sponsored by an Ex Reagan staffer and Jesus nutter..

It was apposed by "the Cal Democrat Party"

Opponents spent $433,614, with the top donor being Wicked Pictures.[2] Other top donors included Cybernet Entertainment and the California Democratic Party.[2] The editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times,[8] the San Francisco Chronicle,[9] and the Sacramento Bee opposed the measure.[5]

Perhaps you should stop just pulling shit out of your ass and lying..

Robbie 12-30-2016 10:06 PM

Ahhhh...New Year coming up! Out with the OLD, and in with the new!

Goodbye Crockett, you just went on "Ignore". Nothing personal against you, but your propensity to insult anyone and everyone is just getting boring.

GFY needs to go back to being for people actually in the porn biz again. And a good start is putting you on "ignore"

Have a nice life and Happy New Year!

crockett 12-30-2016 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21416377)
Ahhhh...New Year coming up! Out with the OLD, and in with the new!

Goodbye Crockett, you just went on "Ignore". Nothing personal against you, but your propensity to insult anyone and everyone is just getting boring.

GFY needs to go back to being for people actually in the porn biz again. And a good start is putting you on "ignore"

Have a nice life and Happy New Year!

As usual Robbie is perfectly fine running around calling other people liars, like he has done to me on multiple occasions. Yet acts like a little girl when he's caught making shit up and "lying" then runs away in denial rather than admit he made shit up and lied..

yea yea we all know in Robbie's World he's always right, typical right wing lunatic.. :1orglaugh

MiamiBoyz 12-30-2016 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416242)
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..


Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News

Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..

Good, who cares what they do. The government will only fuck with you as far as you let them. Personally I have balls unlike a few of you (you know who you are) so bring it on!

They can't fuck with Freedom of Speech or Expression as much as they would love to so fuck them. When they burn all the fucking Bibles and all the fucking Korans then I will voluntarily stop watching porn.

In the meantime - there are always dumb fucks in the government with little cocks and a desire to suck other men's little cocks then go play conservative to hide their cocksucking desires. Fuck them

JesseQuinn 12-30-2016 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21416287)
Men pretending to hate porn...always amusing.

:1orglaugh


always. and usually furtively compulsive users due to their issues with sexuality in general

Paul Markham 12-31-2016 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416242)
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..


Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News

Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..

Just political spin. He might as well try to ban the sun rising in te morning.

Acepimp 12-31-2016 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 21416407)
Good, who cares what they do. The government will only fuck with you as far as you let them. Personally I have balls unlike a few of you (you know who you are) so bring it on!

They can't fuck with Freedom of Speech or Expression as much as they would love to so fuck them. When they burn all the fucking Bibles and all the fucking Korans then I will voluntarily stop watching porn.

In the meantime - there are always dumb fucks in the government with little cocks and a desire to suck other men's little cocks then go play conservative to hide their cocksucking desires. Fuck them

This is 100% accurate! :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416305)
It's the same as the Religious nutters whom torture themselves for their sins. Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..

Crockett, why do you you use the word WHOM all the time, incorrectly? I mean, who are you trying to impress? It's wrong LOL

Quote:

yea yea we all know in Robbie's World he's always right, typical right wing lunatic.. :1orglaugh
Except that Robbie IS right. "Your propensity to insult anyone and everyone is just getting boring." Yeah it's somewhat amusing but def getting boring. Keep calling me a fake nic troll, Crockett. Hilarious! The reality, Crockett, is that I was outside most of the summer doing awesome shit and enjoying my website income. By your own admission, you don't have adult sites and you work a warehouse job. Sounds great, I see that you've learned a lot from your 12 years on this board. Please don't ever stop providing us entertainment. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 12-31-2016 03:07 AM

^^ redhat fake nic ^^

Acepimp 12-31-2016 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21416617)
^^ redhat fake nic ^^

Hilarious! Another clown triggered by facts. "The Russians did it!" HA LOL You too Bladewire, please don't stop stop providing us entertainment. Hope your head doesn't explode from all the facts I'll be dropping on everything you ever post from now on :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

directfiesta 12-31-2016 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21416377)
Ahhhh...New Year coming up! Out with the OLD, and in with the new!

Goodbye Crockett, you just went on "Ignore". Nothing personal against you, but your propensity to insult anyone and everyone is just getting boring.

GFY needs to go back to being for people actually in the porn biz again. And a good start is putting you on "ignore"

Have a nice life and Happy New Year!

expected more out of you ... then running away and hiding with the ignore function :2 cents:

Grapesoda 12-31-2016 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416242)
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..


Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News

Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..



porn has certainly fucked you up :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Joshua G 12-31-2016 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416242)
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..


Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News

Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are..

dumb lib, hello!

if you used both sides of your brain, you would understand that, should such a bill ever get put to a vote, the dems will vote with the family values crowd all day long. libs only hate family values via abortion, otherwise porn is mysogyny, objectification...what makes you think a feminist, like hilary, is better on porn...LOL.

but you only think with the left half of your brain, so keep quacking you blind duck.

:1orglaugh

crockett 12-31-2016 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21416890)
dumb lib, hello!

if you used both sides of your brain, you would understand that, should such a bill ever get put to a vote, the dems will vote with the family values crowd all day long. libs only hate family values via abortion, otherwise porn is mysogyny, objectification...what makes you think a feminist, like hilary, is better on porn...LOL.

but you only think with the left half of your brain, so keep quacking you blind duck.

:1orglaugh

You don't seem to pay attention much. Even with Prop 60 in Cali, the Democratic party aposed that bill Republicans were trying to push. They went so far as to give money to fight aginst it not just their votes..

I really don't get how you can be so brainwashed into not seeing the forrest because of the trees.

You really have to be a special kind of idiot to keep voting Republican, if you work in this industry. It's truly amazing to see how blind you are when all the truth is there at your fingertips yet you still side with people trying to put you out of business.

I truly believe you righties suffer from battered wife syndrome.

crockett 12-31-2016 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21416569)
Just political spin. He might as well try to ban the sun rising in te morning.

Just like 2257 am I right? How many millions did that one cost this industry and look how many years it took to overturn..

Linkster 12-31-2016 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416902)

You really have to be a special kind of idiot to keep voting Republican, if you work in this industry. .

They don't work in this industry in most cases...so they have no concerns whether they vote against their own business or livelihood...or they live overseas and in both cases, don't have anything better to do but try to troll people or jump on some misinformation bandwagon - it's been going on for years...get used to it

Bladewire 12-31-2016 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster (Post 21417640)
They don't work in this industry in most cases...so they have no concerns whether they vote against their own business or livelihood...or they live overseas and in both cases, don't have anything better to do but try to troll people or jump on some misinformation bandwagon

Excellent observation :thumbsup

Paul Markham 01-01-2017 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21416908)
Just like 2257 am I right? How many millions did that one cost this industry and look how many years it took to overturn..

Why shouldn't a publisher be able to prove he has the right to publish the content he publishes?

The law made no difference to the industry. The attempts to overthrow it were pitiful.

A well-enforced 2257 law would save this industry and put it back to making the money it did in 2000.

Never cost you any money. You're not in the porn industry.

crockett 01-01-2017 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21417805)
Why shouldn't a publisher be able to prove he has the right to publish the content he publishes?

The law made no difference to the industry. The attempts to overthrow it were pitiful.

A well-enforced 2257 law would save this industry and put it back to making the money it did in 2000.

Never cost you any money. You're not in the porn industry.

Bullshit.. 2257 drove a lot of people out of this business due to the ridiculous requirements pushed off to secondary content holders. It wasn't about the content "producer" being able to prove, it was everyone who hosted or used that content, was subject to the same rules as the guy who produced it...

You are a content producer and don't have a clue what 2257 was? Eventually secondary content holders had a "loophole" to use but it sure as fuck didn't start that way when the law was first introduced..

Paul Markham 01-02-2017 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21418468)
Bullshit.. 2257 drove a lot of people out of this business due to the ridiculous requirements pushed off to secondary content holders. It wasn't about the content "producer" being able to prove, it was everyone who hosted or used that content, was subject to the same rules as the guy who produced it...

You are a content producer and don't have a clue what 2257 was? Eventually secondary content holders had a "loophole" to use but it sure as fuck didn't start that way when the law was first introduced..

The lack of requirements for Secondary content publishers to be able to prove they had content of a person over 18 who had given their consent to have their content published pushed far more people out of business and made you a lot poorer.

I was around when the law was first introduced and it made complete sense. I had to be able to prove my models were over 18 and that they had given consent for their image to be published. Which then had to be passed onto the publisher and all subsequent publishers. Not shops.

Imagine the world where a publisher has to prove a model is over 18 and consent to publication. The drop in free porn would be so great, your income would double, treble or even go back to the levels of 1-50.

Unless you couldn't comply. Then you're out of business and all your turnover goes to those who can comply.

Too late now though, I can still see why 2257 is a good law. Never had a problem with getting IDs and contracts signed.

As for only content producers or original publishers keeping records, that's a stupid idea. You must be able to see why.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc