![]() |
Republican lawmaker wants to label Porn a Health Hazard
Yet another dumb fuck Republican wanting to do something about porn.. This guy doesn't want to ban it, he wants to name it a public health hazard.. Name it a public health hazard then they can regulate it out of existence..
Virginia lawmaker wants porn declared a public health hazard - CBS News Congrats to all you GFY dumbfucks whom vote Republican..we know who you are.. |
He's a copycat hack, Utah already did this back in April fucking hypocritical losers. :1orglaugh
Utah Declares Porn A Public Health Hazard : The Two-Way : NPR |
Men pretending to hate porn...always amusing.
|
Quote:
It's the same with the anti gay Republicans. Every fucking one of them turns out to be a dick sucker. It's pretty much a given every fucking time. |
Quote:
|
Right up there with the Democrats in California who are declaring fucking on video (making porn) a health hazard.
|
Quote:
The last Anti Porn bill in Cali was Prop 60.. It was solely sponsored by an Ex Reagan staffer and Jesus nutter.. It was apposed by "the Cal Democrat Party" Opponents spent $433,614, with the top donor being Wicked Pictures.[2] Other top donors included Cybernet Entertainment and the California Democratic Party.[2] The editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times,[8] the San Francisco Chronicle,[9] and the Sacramento Bee opposed the measure.[5] Perhaps you should stop just pulling shit out of your ass and lying.. |
Ahhhh...New Year coming up! Out with the OLD, and in with the new!
Goodbye Crockett, you just went on "Ignore". Nothing personal against you, but your propensity to insult anyone and everyone is just getting boring. GFY needs to go back to being for people actually in the porn biz again. And a good start is putting you on "ignore" Have a nice life and Happy New Year! |
Quote:
yea yea we all know in Robbie's World he's always right, typical right wing lunatic.. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
They can't fuck with Freedom of Speech or Expression as much as they would love to so fuck them. When they burn all the fucking Bibles and all the fucking Korans then I will voluntarily stop watching porn. In the meantime - there are always dumb fucks in the government with little cocks and a desire to suck other men's little cocks then go play conservative to hide their cocksucking desires. Fuck them |
Quote:
always. and usually furtively compulsive users due to their issues with sexuality in general |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
^^ redhat fake nic ^^
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
porn has certainly fucked you up :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
if you used both sides of your brain, you would understand that, should such a bill ever get put to a vote, the dems will vote with the family values crowd all day long. libs only hate family values via abortion, otherwise porn is mysogyny, objectification...what makes you think a feminist, like hilary, is better on porn...LOL. but you only think with the left half of your brain, so keep quacking you blind duck. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
I really don't get how you can be so brainwashed into not seeing the forrest because of the trees. You really have to be a special kind of idiot to keep voting Republican, if you work in this industry. It's truly amazing to see how blind you are when all the truth is there at your fingertips yet you still side with people trying to put you out of business. I truly believe you righties suffer from battered wife syndrome. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The law made no difference to the industry. The attempts to overthrow it were pitiful. A well-enforced 2257 law would save this industry and put it back to making the money it did in 2000. Never cost you any money. You're not in the porn industry. |
Quote:
You are a content producer and don't have a clue what 2257 was? Eventually secondary content holders had a "loophole" to use but it sure as fuck didn't start that way when the law was first introduced.. |
Quote:
I was around when the law was first introduced and it made complete sense. I had to be able to prove my models were over 18 and that they had given consent for their image to be published. Which then had to be passed onto the publisher and all subsequent publishers. Not shops. Imagine the world where a publisher has to prove a model is over 18 and consent to publication. The drop in free porn would be so great, your income would double, treble or even go back to the levels of 1-50. Unless you couldn't comply. Then you're out of business and all your turnover goes to those who can comply. Too late now though, I can still see why 2257 is a good law. Never had a problem with getting IDs and contracts signed. As for only content producers or original publishers keeping records, that's a stupid idea. You must be able to see why. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc