What does smaller Trump crowd prove?
 

Lets see some of the natural reasons:

1. DC is democrat infested city - naturally more people would go to watch democrat president vs republican.
2. Blacks would go just because Hussein Obama was black. Lots of blacks in DC.
3. Worse weather than in 2009.
4. Many were scared because of possible riots and other violent behavior that was promised by "tolerant" libbies and paid groups.
5. It was harder to get in the venue due to security reason etc.
6. All the globalist controlled anti Trump narrative media brainwashing the country of Trump being evil (as opposed to praising savior Hussein Obama in 2019).

7. (partially joke) Republicans had harder time to get off the work.

So my 2 statements:

It is natural that crowd was smaller.

What are Crookedteers trying to prove by tauting this fact?

That doesnt do a very good job of supporting Trump as his numbers were less than Bush (a Republican) had at his inauguration in 2005

You statement would be true if all of the list applied to Bush.
It does not.


#4 and #5 does not apply to Bush.

#3 - I don't know, more likely the weather was better, in that case it does not apply as well.

#6 - also does not apply to Bush.

So it is THREE points against Bush VS SEVEN points against Trump.

Really?
Haven't NY times and other outlets issued articles (not just mentioning somewhere, but full blown articles) about crowd comparison BEFORE Trump even said anything about that?

Stop lying.

Again - I saw it on live TV - Did you watch?..

Trump made it a story by lying about it.....

As I said before - He is his own worst enemy...

Small hands, small crowd.

Are you drunk or something? :error:helpme

I am not denying smaller crowds. :helpme:error

Seriously how can someone read this thread and think that I am denying smaller crowd fact? :helpme:error:1orglaugh
Unbelievable. Must be strongly drunk, otherwise unexplainable.

I referred to TLC who said that nobody cared about crowds until Trump (or his press secretary) whined about it by saying that BEFORE that NY Times and other were releasing full blown articles about crowds.
Thus I denounce false TLC statement of "nobody cares".

Read before commenting.

And that is after I replied to you in TWO other threads where I said I was referring to johny Clips and his statement of crowds (meaning I DISAGREED with Johny and urged him to prove his statements).

^^ this

Trump didn't like the media reporting on millions of female protesters today, so he created drama to make the narrative about him again.

Trump needs to be the focus of media every day. He's addicted.

Stop lying.

I said no one cares about crowd size. I am talking about **TODAY**. What people are laughing about **TODAY** is the butt hurt Trump is expressing over those crowd pictures.

Ok, lets say you twisted out of this one.
That was a convenient way out for you, so technically you have merit.
you get out only on technicality.

I do believe the OP is triggered!

http://www.circuitstoday.com/wp-cont...mp-741IC-1.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Wrong. I just wanted to ask what was the big deal if the crowd was smaller (and also give some thoughts of why it was smaller).

lol - Funny shit...

There is no big deal about it (other than what the Trump administration has done ot now make it a big deal). Crowd sizes change all the time and you are totally correct that there are many factors that can affect it.

But I disagree with you that the NYTimes made a big deal of it. They wrote an article about the crowd sizes. I don't know if it went in their print issue, I do know it is on their website.

The text does not attack Trump over the crowd size. It discusses a comparison between Trumps and Obamas and references a college professor in England who has some expertise with crowd sizes. They also note that because of the weather they would probably not be able to get an accurate count because they would not be able to get accurate satellite imagery.

The article also includes a couple of images and even notes that the Trump image is before all the people were in the area.

It was a pretty light article actually. Here is the text of the article:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...ion-crowd.html

.

Trump supporters didn't go because the inauguration lacks the Monster Truck Show atmosphere that his rallies had.

This is kinda odd to watch.. the alt right probably never expected to win this. Their entire lives revolve around hating govt and playing defense of their screwed up ideologies. Now they actually have to do something and they can't seem to get out of defense mode.. It's still everyone elses fault..

His voters are working

true ...

All McDonalds were fully staffed .

mineistaken...

you got a dick up Trumps asshole?


Anyone would think you have it bad for Trump, the way you´re so concerned...


:)

No, mybrainstaken has Trump dick up his ass

nope, it is the other way around ....

Trump has ....

The size of the crowd is unimportant to me.

Trump's handling of the truth of the size of the crowd shows that he can't take it when he learns he's less popular than he thinks he is. The fact that he got his new press secretary to lie to you about it, should scare the fuck out of you. He's not running for Prez anymore, he's prez. And he's still lying.

Trump is in charge now and they still talk about Hillary.

I can't keep count of how many times on blogs their response to a Trump fuckup has been "Killary would have been 10x's worse" or "he's not as crooked as Hillary" SMH

The size of the crowd is totally irrelevant. I just don't know why Trump is trying hard to prove something and battle the media. Honestly, I thought he is a bit more clever. I think this is my 1000th post and I am writing about Trump... Crap! I would like to thank my mom for supporting me in my creative writing work, I wanna thank my internet provider and my fingers and keyboard. It's been great posting 1k times here. And of course I wanna thank Trump for making GFY great again :D

^^^ haha

Sea of white sheets :thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Because Trump has to be the bestist, smartist, richist, most full-of-shitist, bestist commander in chief of the planet :2 cents:

'cause his daddy told him so many moons ago in Trumpland.
Now go play in heavy traffic Donny ...

Much more important is the number 3 million, which is the number of votes that hillary got more than trump.

did you win an award ??????

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Not important enough to make her president. :winkwink:

and you just touched on his main issue, and one that will plague him for his entire 4 years. At 70 years old, the man has still not yet figured out how to choose his battles. Some of us probably know children with more restraint and stoicism.

don't care about the crowd at all...weather also sucked

the problem is lying about it..."biggest crowd ever"

this is the first official press from this admin, a flat out lie

LOL
just found some funny gif
https://i.redd.it/50cagsdgfyay.gif
sorry)) :winkwink:

It looks like Trump is even more stupid than I thought... :mad:

It proves nothing - if it were true

But it's not true. He had a bigger crowd than Obama

So you just lie. Like your Fuhrer tRump. You just keep repeating it like a moron. So you are a moron.

Those kind of make sense:
Having said that, I think there was a lot of excitement for Obama because of the historical aspect of having a black person in the White House.
Trump's presidency will be historical as well but we just don't know it yet.

He will be the last president of the US of A. :1orglaugh

Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump