GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1243846)

Paul Markham 02-03-2017 03:17 AM

Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use
 
Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

After decades of appeasing N.K. while N.K. resolutely improved its military capabilities. The US is drawing a line.

Doing nothing hasn't made the world safer, it's made it more dangerous. China is now a serious military threat and backs N.K. who have built more and better arms.

If war is coming, better to be a trade war or a war against an inferior opponent. Sitting back and wishing it all stays good. Didn't work before and won't work now.

Barry-xlovecam 02-03-2017 04:42 AM

You are not going to war with anybody.
You talk big and carry a little stick.

EddyTheDog 02-03-2017 05:54 AM

I'm not really sure it needed to be said - I think they kind of guessed what with the 27,000 US soldiers on their doorstep...

Barry-xlovecam 02-03-2017 06:01 AM

Korea was a lose-lose in 1954
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
A war in Korea is still a lose-lose

That fool is just trying to force China's hand and that is a real BIGLY lose-lose

Paul Markham 02-03-2017 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21512503)
Korea was a lose-lose in 1954
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
A war in Korea is still a lose-lose

That fool is just trying to force China's hand and that is a real BIGLY lose-lose

You have a point. Just allow NK to overrun SK.

Or just hope the huge military build up is never put to use. Whoops to late for that China has already invaded other lands.

I do agree with your comment on 1954. Allowing NK to take SK would have meant a bigger useless State relying on China to feed it. Seeing as China couldn't feed itself in 1954, the death by starvation would have been horrible.

Interesting reading. https://www.quora.com/How-does-North...sustain-itself

directfiesta 02-03-2017 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21512491)
I'm not really sure it needed to be said - I think they kind of guessed what with the 27,000 US soldiers on their doorstep...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

maybe they think they are vacationning ?

Linkster 02-03-2017 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21512284)
Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

After decades of appeasing N.K. while N.K. resolutely improved its military capabilities. The US is drawing a line.

Doing nothing hasn't made the world safer, it's made it more dangerous. China is now a serious military threat and backs N.K. who have built more and better arms.

If war is coming, better to be a trade war or a war against an inferior opponent. Sitting back and wishing it all stays good. Didn't work before and won't work now.

Where these people come up with their opinions is amazing...there is no way in hell China would back NK...as a member of the UN, China has backed sanctions on them...and they certainly don't want 100s of thousands of refugees from NK pouring into China.

China likes the little buffer zone between SK and China..and the US along with China and Japan has been supplying North Korea with 75% of their food for years

Posturing is only as good as the lack of intelligence of the people you posture towards - otherwise you just look like a fool that falls for everything reporters put out these days as "experts" on foreign issues

Barry-xlovecam 02-03-2017 11:40 AM

Or I'll huff and puff and BLOW YOUR HOUSE DOWN ...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123