Susan Rice BUSTED, gave the order to unmask Trump staff names.
 

The only question is, who gave her the order to do it? We all know it was Hussein.

OMG you fucking idiots never stop. You're so naïve to fall for that bullshit. Take a good look at the rest of the web page, you clown.

says the fucking idiot that never stops.


:2 cents:

JoushaMo aka DynaMo aka 20 other nicks do you really think you fool anyone with all these fake nicks posting your BS?

Seek mental help..use that Obamacare before Trump takes it away..

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

No FAKE news here ....... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Cernovich

:1orglaugh

Do you get your news from these guys by any chance?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8geQOlV0AA9oXG.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8gdfYUUwAAI39M.jpg

Susan Rice: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...iates-in-intel

"White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

...

Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

...
Rice's requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials do not vindicate Trump's own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.

...

The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rice's unmasking requests were likely within the law."

It's safe to say you're Russian, since you don't list your location in your profile and you only post pro Puntin and anti-American disinformation propoganda, and you refused to answer with your nationality when I asked in the other thread. Lame

All you anti-American posters never post your location in your profiles = fake nics and/or anti American Russian troll(s)

^^^ dumb lib you are supposed to love foreigners & import them to US illegally so democrats can monopolize power. didnt you get the memo dumb lib?

dumb lib.

:1orglaugh

wasn't susan rice the dumb lib that recently said we need honesty from government leaders? ROFL.

you dumb fucking libs love to accuse others of what you do. & you are totally clueless you do it.

right crockett. bladewire.

dumb libs.

:1orglaugh

^^^ Redhat TRIGGERED! Prepare for his other nics to start posting: John1975 / JohnnyClips / Joshua G / JohnnyNight etc...

Busted doing what? Her job?

Another anti American pro Russia / Trump propaganda thread by Matt 26z who doesn't list his country of residence in his profile, imagine that.

Susan Rice should be commended for doing her job & not breaking the law she's a true patriot.

She abused her position and I doubt she was acting alone.

She unmasked the names and then Obama signs the EO for intel agencies to share info. He was in on it.

That's a lie. Post proof that her unmasking was illegal.

You're trying to divert from Trumps collusion with Putin by playing symantics and lying about illegal "unmasking" not gonna work :1orglaughs

The real issue is :

Did Russia influence/meddled in the last US election ....


Keep the eyes on the ball .....

can you define any actual influence?

do you actually think voters were turned by the dirt russians dug up on the DNC & hillz? even rolling stone is calling out the hysteria over russia, writing how the media tied the whole sanders campaign to the russians.

do you think russians hacked voting machines?

just the idea that russia could have actually been a factor is liberal la la land. nobody worried about russians while hilary was perceived to be a lock. but keep your eye on that ball!

trump won. get over it.

:)

Yes. https://medium.com/@d1gi/whats-missi...s-fa22090c8c17

Yes. There's a very solid theory here: https://patribotics.blog/2017/04/01/...a-impeachment/


Completely untrue. There were many people warning about Russian interference. https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...-quicktake-q-a

"In April 2016, Democratic Party leaders called in a cybersecurity firm to look at suspicious software on their computers. The firm said it found digital footprints of hackers tied to the Russian government. The Democratic National Committee went public with the news and the suspicion of Russian involvement in June....""

June 2016 announcement of Russian Concerns: https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...et-trump-files
"Hackers tied to the Russian government gained access to servers at the Democratic National Committee, securing files of opposition research on presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, according to party officials and a cybersecurity company.

The hackers were ?two very sophisticated Russian actors,? according to Dmitri Alperovitch, cofounder of CrowdStrike Inc., a cybersecurity company that the Democrats called in early May after sensing something awry with their computer network."

You are being nothing short of ridiculous.

You are trying to make this sound as if she did something. You making this sound like this was unusual. Listen to me carefully when I make the following statement... I'll even put it in bold for you.

A former United States Army lieutenant general and Defense Intelligence Agency directory was communicating with the Russians directly after he left the Army and the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Doesn't that scare the piss out of you?

This man was in charge of ALL of our intelligence secrets, yet he was running off to Russia, giving speeches, and getting awards from them. Doesn't this sound off alarm bells at the highest levels?

Again with the bold....

There is no reason to keep such information unmasked.

The only reason to keep such information masked it to protect the privacy of the average citizen who has done nothing wrong.

But the in case of the man who ran our intelligence agencies directly communicating with a foreign power without permission is not a time to hide information about what they are doing.

Of all people, our webmaster crowd here should be able to instantly see the validity in this research: https://teapainusa.wordpress.com/201...e-with-russia/

"Tea Pain’s working theory is that Russia created a voter targeting database with information gleaned from hacked DNC data rolls and other data rolls “acquired” from other states to feed this growing contact database. That database originated at Russian Intelligence which was in turn replicated to Russia’s Alfa Bank. This is where the “data laundering” takes place, Alfa Bank is the pivot point where the FSB’s data fingerprints are wiped clean. Ironically Russia launders its data at the same place it launders its money.

In New York Trump Tower could merge data into this system using various legal sources as well. Spectrum Health could also add value to the data by matching names and addresses in their extensive healthcare databases to harvest email addresses and phone numbers to flesh out this list. All these changes would be promptly replicated back to Russia in a matter of hours.

Once back in the hands of Russian Intelligence, this massaged data could be programmatically matched up with social media handles to create a micro-targeted “hit list” for the thousand Russian trolls employed by Putin."

First it was russia hacked voting machines.
Then there was that recount which actually gained more votes for trump.
Now it's russian influence. Like russian somehow convinced millions of people to vote trump over killary.
Seriously, snowflakes. Give it up

Omg is this a joke? So people were trolled and that made them vote republican? You realize this is a huge reach and you are insulting the inteligence of democrats who jumped ship.

Secretary of State creates an illegal mail server for official State Department business (knowing full well its illegal and having been briefed continually on how to handle communications by the FBI, recognize classified docs etc etc), violates sworn oaths as to how she'll handle docs, hides the server a private residence, hires PRIVATE friends to manage the server and its contents (again, not legal), then continually mishandles government documents, mishandles documents with the highest classifications, (lies about it daily through the campaign and before), has server get hacked by multiple foreign entities,.... is later REQUIRED BY SUBPOENA to turn over the server hard drive and ALL OF ITS CONTENTS, turn over numerous devices such as laptops and phones and INSTEAD begins deleting emails (destroying evidence under subpoena), smashing phones with a hammer and destroying laptops... and lied every single step of the way, getting busted in lie after lie after lie.

But that was not a problem for you dumb fucking idiots who are now so suddenly "concerned" about State security.

Makes sense.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

nope, nothing to see ..... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-camp...opstories.html

I stand a little bit corrected. There may be something here, though it's not the huge bombshell Fox News et all are making it out to be.

Trump Has a Problem With NSA But So Does Obama | Observer

"In addition, Rice didn’t like to play by the rules, including the top-secret ones. On multiple occasions, she asked the NSA to do things they regarded as unethical and perhaps illegal. When she was turned down—the NSA fears breaking laws for any White House, since they know they will be left holding the bag in the end—Rice kept pushing.

As a longtime NSA official who experienced Rice’s wrath more than once told me, “We tried to tell her to pound sand on some things, but it wasn’t allowed—we were always overruled.” On multiple occasions, Rice got top Agency leadership to approve things which NSA personnel on the front end of the spy business refused. This means there may be something Congress and the FBI need to investigate here.

Susan Rice and Team Trump are both despised by our intelligence agencies, albeit for different reasons. The prospect of a death-match between them is causing unusual emotions in the IC. “For us, this is like the Iran-Iraq war,” explained another longtime NSA official: “We’d like both sides to lose.”"

elli im willing to bet loretta issuing 5 immunity deals in hilarys email investigation, & destroying computer evidence, only to find no wrongdoing committed by anybody is also not a big deal to you. hilary was letting top secrets fly around. no big deal. not to obama, or the media, or you.

so obviously susan rice's thing is no big deal too, right? like rochard says...routine to release names of political opponents for political purposes.

so i take your opinions with a grain of salt. you read like a drone for the corporate media.

:2 cents:

^^^ Fake news again ugh you guys are desperate

It's safe to say you're Russian, since you don't list your location in your profile and you only post pro Puntin and anti-American disinformation propoganda.

/ moron bladewire adhominem logic mode.

Dude, just stop with the fake news, the American people were fooled, I admit it, but not again. Fuck the Russian and everyone that conspires with them.

Let's go ahead with your theory that Hilary was a criminal mastermind working all of this behind the scenes during her stay at the State Department.

How is that relevant NOW? What does that have to do with Trump? Sure, go collect evidence and indict her. Oh, wait, that investigation (multiple, actually) have already concluded she was fine.

NOW can we focus on the topic at hand? The corruption in the CURRENT administration? What is this need to deflect on someone who has had zero power for over a year?

so instead of addressing what i said, you talk around it, pretend hilarys innocence is legit in the face of 5 immunity deals for her friends, then want to focus back on trump/russia.

sorry but the fact of obama using the intel agencies to dig dirt on trump for a year, then unmask all this data & spread it around the community...no big deal to you. no big deal the democrats went from denying any surveillence to...rice is just doing her job...clownshoes. they were spying on a political opponent. no big deal to elli.

lets talk about why you cant objectively evaluate liberal criminal conduct. keep dodging.

:)

The obsessive redhat with multiple nics that you replied to only posts under that nic to put people down and push the alt-white agenda. Anything bad about Trump or the alt-white movement is rejected. Most people here have him blocked :2 cents:
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...rn-images.html

The topic in this thread is Susan Rice and whether she legally or not unmasked people who were caught up in SIGINT evidence. Hilary doesn't enter into it. Neither does Obama.

The fact that Obama was digging into Trump (if that's a fact) shows that we are right to be concerned, as he was, and ALSO that Trump NEVER should have been a viable candidate. Ever. Not with so many people having so many concerns about him and his motives.

I know. But I have this nagging feeling that if people don't show the ridiculousness of these posts, then there are non-posters out there who will feel have some validity.

so you have a trump-hate obsession that colors any objective logic. stop deflecting hilary. hilary & the IRS scandal combine to show a pattern of politicizing the law by this administration...just like courts dig up a defendants past to reveal a pattern of bad behavior...which you once again DONT WANT TO TALK ABOUT.

when you cant face the facts susan rice had no cause to do what she did, & face the facts of a corrupt administration that conspired to take down & hijack the political opposition...

NO BIG DEAL TO ELLI...

:1orglaugh

Excellent point :thumbsup

i conclude elli is willfully ignorant. has blinders to liberal corruption. & hates trump to the point of believing ANYTHING the liberal media can think of to shit-fling at him.

this past weekend, schiff said there is still no definitive evidence of any collusion between trump & russia to manipulate the election. obama was spying on trump, found nothing but a flynn fib. dont let facts get in the way of a good russian yarn, elli!

a year from now elli will still be waiting for that russian smoking gun.

:1orglaugh

And I conclude that you are willfully ignorant to the current corruption in the White House and beyond. I suppose you are OK with Trump's son in law being a de facto Secretary of State and Erik Prince making motions towards armaments and war without official announcements from the President? You are OK with Ivanka getting an office and security clearance for no reason? You are OK with this so-called billionaire charging the country for millions of dollars of security for his wife and child even though they insist on living in a different city? Why doesn't he see the financial hardship it is causing and offer to pay for it?

Try discussing the topic without using words like "liberal" or "left wing" and you'll get a lot farther. This is far beyond who is on which team. That time has long passed. We are now in the time of "figuring out what the hell is going on" and bringing those responsible to account.

im aware of those matters. are any of them crimes? why are you discussing ivankas job when im talking about a former administration illegally using intel to smear trump & destroy him. hardly apples to apples.

i guess i care about rule of law & you care about what ivanka is up to.

:)

PS - there was a good history channel show about the office of the presidency...it is a perk of his job...he goes where he wants, taxpayers pay. both presidents take nice advantage. the obamas certainly did. nobody cared when michelle took extended globe trotting vacations costing taxpayers millions. you only care now because you hate trump.

I'm not talking about the Obamas or Hilary because that is not what I'm concerned about right now. They are no longer in power. If you want to start investigations into their actions, then by all means, protest and petition for that to happen. Trump would likely be happy to get those started.

I understand that taxpayers pay for the protection of the president and his family. However, there has never been a billionaire president before. There has also never been a president with such a frequently traveling family or a wife and child who didn't share a residence with him. These are extraneous costs that are far beyond the scale of anything previously considered "normal." If he truly cared about his citizens, he would offer to cover the cost himself.

I am still not seeing the issue here. He was a high ranking office in the US Military AND former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. If his name came up in incidental surveillance, of course it would be unmasked. In fact, I'll go a step further - because of his position and his actions with the Russian government, it's entirely possible he was being actively tracked - meaning, long before Trump stared his campaign Flynn was being tracked.

Take politics completely out of it.... If a former US General and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency suddenly starts making trips to Russia, meets with Putin, gets paid by the Russian Government for speeches, and gets an award from Putin.... Wouldn't this be tracked by the CIA? I would fucking hope so.

more of the same. doesnt want to discuss liberal corruptions & violations of law. at least you admit your ignorance is willful, simply because they are not in power.

thats a petty, substance-free reason to dodge. meanwhile you will consume any & every naked speculation CNN can dream of, as long as its anti-trump.

just admit you hate trump, & refuse to look at liberals are hijacking his presidency with illegal intel gathering.

nevermind, you are already saying that. crimes dont by liberals dont matter when they are no longer in power.

:)