GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why isn't female circumcision promoted alongside male circumcision? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1257487)

Matt 26z 04-13-2017 06:40 PM

Why isn't female circumcision promoted alongside male circumcision?
 
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

mce 04-13-2017 06:44 PM

It is not even remotely close to male circumcism

FGM involves lopping off the clitoris

On a nerve for nerve basis, that's like having your penis cut off at the base.

Matt 26z 04-13-2017 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mce (Post 21703855)
It is not even remotely close to male circumcism

FGM involves lopping off the clitoris

On a nerve for nerve basis, that's like having your penis cut off at the base.

I'm not talking about FGM as it is commonly defined. There are multiple degrees of FGM. The least intrusive of them all, female circumcision, has been grouped in with FGM as mothers wouldn't dare cut their baby girls but they will cut their baby boys.

Matt 26z 04-13-2017 07:07 PM

Here are two points of reference on the subject. It appears as though female circumcision does go by the name clitoral hood reduction and is somewhat in practice. But certainly nothing done to baby girls the way it is very commonly done to baby boys in the US and Canada.

Eradicate HIV: 50 Difference between Female Circumcision and Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction

pimpmaster9000 04-14-2017 01:52 AM

ask one hung lo he is a victim of snip dick and is very angry about it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

lys11 04-14-2017 02:29 AM

Male circumcision is for medical reasons, with the goal of preventing diseases

pimpmaster9000 04-14-2017 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lys11 (Post 21704329)
Male circumcision is for medical reasons, with the goal of preventing diseases

Yes 1in 400 circumcised men will not get a urinary tract infection and won't have to take a pill to cure it...Also they can neglect hygiene longer LOL

notinmybackyard 04-14-2017 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21703840)
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Frankly I never heard of "roast beef lips" until I read this thread. Just the same I like big lips just as much as little ones and I also prefer my women with a big natural full bush. - So "roast beef" with with pubic hair that's never been cut since birth and I'm a very happy man.

But the fact is that I don't care if a woman young or old, short or tall, fat or skinny, married or single, shaved or hairy. All I care about is she a crazy pervert like me that enjoys fucking and are her orgasms real.

Leave them all fucking natural that's my vote.

CaptainHowdy 04-14-2017 08:04 AM

My moves in bed makes women feel circumcised ...

jbvryant 04-14-2017 08:15 AM

Men who's culture is into circumcision only expects to feel pain once on their lives.
Women has to endure pain in ear piercing , painful first time sex, potential sexual abuse and child birth. Yeah right maybe we should add female circumcision/genital mutilation to that list.

celandina 04-15-2017 08:40 AM

In WW2 Germans used a cirumscission as a proof that that person was a Jew...( or an American).....now analyse who and why promoted that :2 cents:

mineistaken 04-16-2017 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina (Post 21706909)
In WW2 Germans used a cirumscission as a proof that that person was a Jew...( or an American).....now analyse who and why promoted that :2 cents:

Huh? Circumcision amongst Jews were popular well before that century.
So yeah, if you have that Germans are not being circumcised and Jews are being circumcised, surely you can use that to distinguish who is a likely Jew and who is likely not.

bronco67 04-16-2017 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21703840)
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Are you able to do anything except look like a gaping asshole? I feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with you on a personal basis. They all probably wish you were dead every time you open your stupid mouth hole. What I'm saying is, not only are you ignorant...but you're a fucking clown asshole with shitty ideas. Kill yourself.

Stop having thoughts. It's not your thing. I reiterate...kill yourself soon.

celandina 04-16-2017 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21708139)
Huh? Circumcision amongst Jews were popular well before that century.
So yeah, if you have that Germans are not being circumcised and Jews are being circumcised, surely you can use that to distinguish who is a likely Jew and who is likely not.

I guess you just repeated my point. So no cigar. Here is a hint : Why is there so much cirumscicion in America and so little in Europe.???.:)

mineistaken 04-16-2017 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina (Post 21708424)
I guess you just repeated my point. So no cigar. Here is a hint : Why is there so much cirumscicion in America and so little in Europe.???.:)

Your post sounded as if those who promoted it anticipated ww2/nazi germany etc or had something to do with nazis or ww2 or simething.
My mistake if you did not mean that, but you can agree that it certainly sounded along those lines :)

NatalieK 04-16-2017 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21703840)
Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

I would have thought most circumcisions are for both hygiene or religion & not cosmetic :2 cents:

starling 04-16-2017 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21704836)
My moves in bed makes women feel circumcised ...

In pain, unsatisfied and feeling like they're missing something?

EddyTheDog 04-16-2017 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21703840)
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Female circumcision is to stop women enjoying sex - It's a means of control...

To compare them shows what a retard you are.....

Paul Markham 04-17-2017 12:57 AM

There is no excess skin around a pussy. Matt, you should hire a girl so you can learn what a pussy is.

celandina 04-18-2017 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21708460)
Your post sounded as if those who promoted it anticipated ww2/nazi germany etc or had something to do with nazis or ww2 or simething.
My mistake if you did not mean that, but you can agree that it certainly sounded along those lines :)


My point was that Hitler banned all Jewish doctors from practice in Germany in 1935, then by 1939 he started killing them all over the Europe. So by 1945 there were very few ( to none) practicing Jewish doctors in the Continental Europe, whilst in USA there was (and is) a large proprtion of Jewish doctors, so the cirumscission was promoted by them. I am NOT commenting if cirumscission is good or not, nor discussing any propaganda, just statistics.:2 cents:

CaptainHowdy 04-18-2017 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starling (Post 21708634)
In pain, unsatisfied and feeling like they're missing something?

Unsatisfied :( ...

CaptainHowdy 04-18-2017 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21711412)
Unsatisfied :( ...

... like a cliteroctomy.

VikingMan 04-18-2017 10:33 AM

All I need to do if I am determining if someone had critical thinking skills is to ask them about their view on male circumcision.

Is female genital mutilation worse? Yes of course it is worse but using that as the argument of why male genital mutilation is acceptable is like saying shooting someone in the leg is bad but shooting them in toe is perfectly fine.

MaDalton 04-18-2017 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21703840)
Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

for being a troll you are not funny or annoying enough - therefore you must be just incredibly stupid

Matt 26z 04-18-2017 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog (Post 21708679)
Female circumcision is to stop women enjoying sex - It's a means of control...

To compare them shows what a retard you are.....

No, that is female genital mutilation. Muslims do that so their women are more likely to remain virgin until marriage.

Female circumcision is more commonly known as clitoral hood reduction and some women who want a pretty pussy have the prosedure done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction
I merely asked why that procedure wasn't done at birth since the male equivalent of it often is.

EddyTheDog 04-18-2017 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21712507)
No, that is female genital mutilation. Muslims do that so their women are more likely to remain virgin until marriage.

Female circumcision is more commonly known as clitoral hood reduction and some women who want a pretty pussy have the prosedure done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction
I merely asked why that procedure wasn't done at birth since the male equivalent of it often is.

OK my bad for falling for your troll...

dillfly2000 04-18-2017 09:41 PM

I'm just glad I don't remember it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc