Navy Seal porn actor investigated
 

The US navy´s investigating a moonlighting navy seal for acting in porn.

US Navy investigating a decorated SEAL who moonlights as a porn actor


If it´s legal porn, which it is, considering his wife´s spoke out, I say leave the guy alone...

Navy SEAL’s wife: We made porn films to pay the bills | New York Post

what´s your thoughts?

My thoughts are that you are too stupid to participate in any intelligent conversation

my thoughts are, you´ve never performed in a porn with your wife & have never been a navy SEAL...



the guy was playing with his wife & making extra money to pay his way in life!


Fuck you baddog, i´m about twice as intelligent as you :321GFY

Yeah baddog - you forgot Gary is a member of Mensa :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I don't think anyone wants to see that :2 cents:

This is the epitome of traditional cuckold. All tough on the outside, tight shirts, big mouth, bar intimidator. Tiny dick who gets off watching his wife getting drilled by Donny Longs.

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...trip=all&w=541

a navy seal fucking his wife and another woman...


my fucking god, you think no one wants to see that!


Amazed Reality kings haven´t spoke to him yet :1orglaugh

An insult just out of nowhere damn.

The military is all over the place with punishing people for what they do on their free time. Often they don't and rarely when they do, if it was nothing against the law or having to do with paying a debt, you can get any actions reversed on appeal.

Over the years in San Diego I've shot everything from new recruits to Navy Seals, to special intelligence officers etc. and often higher command knows and has no issue, it's when someone reports it to get revenge that things go downhill, because then it's on record and people have to act on it. :2 cents:

No, Gary, its Navy Seal watching his wife fucking other guys :1orglaugh Something you are used to. :2 cents:

It´s such a shame others have to ruin things for others trying to make a success of their lives or just paying their way in life, especially a good guy that would commit himself in honor to battle anyone against you or me :2 cents:


&, NO Horatio, Gary films me in a 50/50 partnership, he´s no cuckold, we fuck so much & if I escort, it´s 121, we´ve a very stable & secure relationship...

sex is sex, we enjoy each others company 24/7 the rest of the year :thumbsup :321GFY

A violation of the UCMJ as is possession of porn.

For someone that wants us to believe you photograph military dudes you are not very smart either. I am sure you must have at least heard of the Uniform Code of Military Justice; even if you assist others in violating it.

FYI, I don't think you are much smarter than she/he is.

codes or no codes, isn´t it wrong a guy cannot make a little extra money to pay his bills & try to get out of debt by doing another job?

It´s ok for Trump to slice the benefits for war heros...

fucking codes, fucking idiots :disgust

There is a video of 3 US Marines having sex with each other and a woman.
https://xhamster.com/movies/2591428/jacuzzi_bi.html

They have large dicks and are probably pretty tough. Who cares?, as long as they are adults and are not being forced.

I would think you guys would want to push sexual extremes to sell dating sites? Or is that dead too?

Why not sell drugs then?

Wow, traditional family. No kids I hope..

I am sure those twinks are as much marines as the cops at bachelorette parties.
And no, I am not clicking on that. :Oh crap

are you serious?

are you fucking retarded?

And you have the cheek to say to me about intelligence, you obnoxious wanker :1orglaugh

Military people took a sworn oath and must abide by the UCMJ so yes it is wrong for them to break military law. When their contract is up they then can abide by civilian law.

You really hurt my feelings. I thought you had started being nice again.

I've been shooting military since I began in '99. I didn't shoot any military during my five year stretch in Australia, but before and after, yes.

:2 cents:

but surely there´s no part saying you cannot work for another job? Earn extra income?

They honestly don't care. Only if you're high up and/or someone reports you they'll have to do their job and go by the books. The military is not out watching porn to make sure no service people are performing out of uniform.

Is that forbidden in the USA?

One in the military belongs to the military 24/7 but normally has "off duty hours" and as long as the job does not interfere with military duty and is not in violation of the UCMJ then yes a military person can have an outside job. Until ones contract with the military is over they have to abide by the UCMJ.

It is forbidden by military personnel under the UCMJ which is the law someone in the military is required to abide by.

No it's not illegal.

If you're in the military you might be breaking an agreement depending on if you got permission to go-to a modeling interview or do modeling work or various other things.

The guy in the article is a higher up and he was targeted by a formal civilian complaint, the absolutely only reason it's an issue.

It is not breaking an agreement, it is breaking military law and is punishable by military law.

I don't believe it's against the UCMJ to have a part time job while being on active duty, so long as it doesn't interfere with your regular duties. When I was in the Marines I worked part time as a bartender for a while.

It isn't and that is what I stated. But working in porn or possessing porn is in violation of the UCMJ, unless they have revised the law but I don't think they have.

You're not listening to x military and a guy who's shot miltary (marines, navy, army) for the better part of 17 years, and you're not linking to anything to back up your stance of breaking military law, but that's ok, it's GFY and those with knowledge are here to waste it on def ears, it's the GFY way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

I am ex long term military. I do not feel a need to link to the UCMJ. There are many links to the UCMJ on google. Read it and educate yourself about military law, or not. I don't give a fuck one way or the other.

Ok so no proof to back up your claim. No worries

I've had a guy come in uniform and I refused to shoot until he educated me about using plumbers tape to black out his name and the Navy patch on his uniform and everything would be to code, so whatever. I'm gonna still shoot military guys and you're gonna think I'm a law breaker and thats cool it makes me feel rebellious :1orglaugh

Unless you are in the military you are not violating the UCMJ, so no you are not breaking the law, those that live under the UCMJ are in violation of it if they are engaging in porn or in possession of Porn. But I am not going to deal with your ignorance of military law any longer. Have a good night.

Hmm... I thought it's ok in America. You're not North Korea and everybody has rights in Land of the Free. Isn't it?

http://ww1.hdnux.com/photos/13/56/17.../1024x1024.jpg

http://warfare-inc.com/wp-content/up...32611037_n.jpg

http://www.gaystarnews.com/wp-conten...nefits-008.jpg

'Gays In The Military,' Vincent Cianni's New Book, Documents 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Impact And Repeal | The Huffington Post

God bless him. Shame that people question his integrity because he did porn.

They are questioning if he is in violation of the UCMJ. Military personnel live under a different set of laws than civilian's do.

Yeah I film straight military guys, not Gay military :thumbsup You do love your Gay stereotypes Boris :1orglaugh

Might also have to do if they are an Officer or not.. Officers are expected to be much more pristine and accountable for their actions than say a grunt is..

It is a violation of the UCMJ but just as DA's are the ones that choose to charge and prosecute at their discretion in the civilian world. In the Military the Commanding Officer is the "DA" and it is he/she that chooses to charge and prosecute, be it an officer or be it an enlisted person.

What article of the UCMJ would a person who did porn be violating?

I am not going to go thru the UCMJ for you, but there are a couple of them that cover the matter. One is a real catch all, "conduct unbecoming" which covers about anything that the CO wants it to cover and applies to Officers. Article 133. Article 134 applies both to Officers and Enlisted personnel.

Article 120 is a kind of catch all involving sexual misconduct.

Thus 133, 134, 120 can be and are used as catch all articles that people have been charged and went to a Courts Martial for possession of porn or engaging in sexual activities.

When I was in the military even Playboy mags where "forbotten" in the barracks. But this also depended alot on who your Company Commander was or who your Battalion Commander was and how much of a by the book person they were.

Very cool you were in the military that's awesome :thumbsup. I think things are more lax now regarding sexuality in the military. I'm not going to go into more detail, I deleted an additional paragraph I was going to post, out of caution.

I think Scmidt is doing this for a publicity stunt, as NSWC investigations are never public knowledge :winkwink: Good for him he should milk it after serving 23 years! According to one article his wife and him own the studio and rights to all their content and he wasn't paid talent.

As much as baddog is a little fucking cunt, there is no way you are twice as intelligent as anyone lol.

So lovely boyz )))))

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You do realize that all military personnel don't adhere to the same constitutional laws and don't have the protections citizens do? They give that right up, they don't even have the right to a trial by jury. They are governed by the UCMJ which is MUCH harsher than anything in the laws we're used to. Yes it is against DOD policy to engage in that behavior, just like the secret service agents that got fired nailing columbian hookers. A military person can be grabbed for no reason by an MP thrown in the brig for however long for whatever reason, they don't get a trial, they get a small tribunal of higher officers. You sign on the dotted line you really do sign away your rights in that way.