![]() |
Trumpcare round 2 about to start
Apparently, as early as tomorrow or this weekend the Trump administration will be releasing the text of their new health care bill meant to repeal and replace Obamacare. Supposedly, it makes concessions to make both moderate and strict conservatives happy. I'm not sure how they are going to do that, but it should be interesting to see.
I have a feeling if it moves far enough to the right to satisfy the Freedom Caucus in the House it will DOA in the Senate. |
Quote:
Another WIN ... so tired of all that winning ! |
It's probably DOA in the Senate
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ObamaCare now costs me $450 a month and covers nothing that was covered last year, running me another $750 a month.
I welcome new ideas. |
Quote:
I don't want to see them do things simply so they can say they did them and end up not fixing the problems or even making them worse. |
Quote:
should their tax money not be used to build streets? what about the rich people who give their children in private schools? should their money not be used to build schools? and last not least - what about the people who do not like wars? should their money not be used to finance the military household? this is called SOCIETY - but as US never had this you will probably not understand the advantages of "all for one and one for all" |
If you are a woman of child bearing age your premiums might go up 50%[or a lot more-- IDK]? Pregnancy is very "high-risk" and rather likely. Men are responsible for that "certain disease" also -- it takes two to tango :2 cents:
Insurance not paying for family planning, or in worst cases -- abortion is rather stupid also -- from a purely economic standpoint. You could use the same argument for property taxes -- if you have no children in school you should not have to pay for the school district. In reality, the quality of the schools that you pay for in your property taxes influences the value of your home and the community that it is in. No one wants to take the heat to deal with the real problems with healthcare for the 60%? of the people that are not entitled to receive Medicaid and Medicare now. That will boomerang on the government -- really it is right now. |
Quote:
That said, me paying for insurance services that I will never use isn't really helping society as a whole have cheaper, better insurance. It is just making shareholders and insurance executives richer. Roads, schools, and the military are all things that we all benefit from directly or indirectly whether we actively use them or not. As the system is set up right now, me paying more for insurance so that my policy covers stuff I will never use isn't helping others pay less. The number one thing the government could do to lower health care costs for everyone is cap how much pharma companies can charge for their drugs and put some kind of price restrictions on the cost of health care. That isn't going to happen anytime soon, so it doesn't really matter who pays for what coverage, it will eventually fail in its current form. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc