Why does government always insist on PUNISHING SUCCESS?
 

Oh yeah, Google has become a giant... time to crush it into many small bits.

:error:error:error:helpme

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/o...up-google.html

Monopolies are good?
It would benefit people to see Google chopped up a bit. Their latest search algo updates are dreadful...:2 cents:

Easier to punish success and "redistribute" to losers.
Since there are few successes and lots of losers it is easier to disappoint few in order to reward masses.
Leftwing ideology at its finest.

Ps: I am only answering to the thread title, not meaning I disagree or agree with specific google instance being called that. Might be more complex thing.

This logic assumes monopolies all formed due to cheating. What if a monopoly is natural because a company just produced a REALLY GOOD product? I know, it's hard to believe but it DOES happen...

Google is not a monopoly... ridiculous

Google has decimated many industries and businesses, largely by theft / scraping & distribution of that content, then using the profits to payoff politicians to make it legal enough to stay in business.

But go ahead and say Google produced a "really good" product :1orglaugh