GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I got a DMCA notice (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1263358)

adultchatpay 05-20-2017 03:23 AM

I got a DMCA notice
 
So i got a "Notice of DMCA removal from Google Search"
blah blah blah...
Here are the affected URL(s):

mywebsite.com/tag/webcam
..and a bunch of other website included in the ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS:
Including pornhub,. etc

Is this even a valid DMCA removal notice? It's so broad, i mean there are literally thousand of videos in that category.

What do usually do next with that?

Klen 05-20-2017 03:26 AM

I got same, but i dont give a shit about it, it's not link i rank for keyword webcam lol.

j3rkules 05-20-2017 04:08 AM

Change the name of the tag so it will appear on the search results.

Klen 05-20-2017 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j3rkules (Post 21780214)
Change the name of the tag so it will appear on the search results.

This have nothing with tag lol

freecartoonporn 05-20-2017 06:11 AM

file counter DMCA with google and https://lumendatabase.org/

incredibleworkethic 05-20-2017 06:27 AM

I remove the content, keep the blog post up and counter DMCA saying I wrote the content and took any infringing content down.

adultchatpay 05-20-2017 08:04 AM

How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The orignating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

gnawledge 05-20-2017 11:06 AM

A lot of DMCA nonsense is sent out by models or first time cam sluts or dudes thinking money is gonna roll in. Then they realize their room is saved or archived somewhere and get butt hurt about it. If you do an RSS feed and it's saved, delete the post. If not-- fuck it.

Klen 05-20-2017 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnawledge (Post 21780610)
A lot of DMCA nonsense is sent out by models or first time cam sluts or dudes thinking money is gonna roll in. Then they realize their room is saved or archived somewhere and get butt hurt about it. If you do an RSS feed and it's saved, delete the post. If not-- fuck it.

I once had complaint from playboy model for having "her first and last name" in pornstar index. She was mentioning some "new york privacy law". I removed it so she can stop bothering me, but she was even demanding to remove it from yahoo/google index which is impossible as it takes time for search engines to update.

Klen 05-20-2017 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchatpay (Post 21780427)
How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The originating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

As i said, unless you receiving search engine traffic directly to your webcam section, dont bother. But yes it's a stupid thing.

Bladewire 05-20-2017 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by incredibleworkethic (Post 21780313)
I remove the content, keep the blog post up and counter DMCA saying I wrote the content and took any infringing content down.

Good business :thumbsup

Bladewire 05-20-2017 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultchatpay (Post 21780427)
How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The orignating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

Just take it down common sense, no offense :2 cents:

TheDynasty 05-20-2017 11:32 AM

I just take it down and continue on with new blogs can't let one model get ya down

The Porn Nerd 05-20-2017 11:42 AM

And...............so?

Bladewire 05-20-2017 11:43 AM

You're in the wrong business if you get attached to content.

On the rare instance you get a DMCA take the content down and move on.

The only people attached to content are those with rights to it and you don't want your business and personal life targeted so you act in good will and comply with the law it's common sense :2 cents:

Klen 05-20-2017 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21780676)
You're in the wrong business if you get attached to content.

On the rare instance you get a DMCA take the content down and move on.

The only people attached to content are those with rights to it and you don't want your business and personal life targeted so you act in good will and comply with the law it's common sense :2 cents:

What he is running probably same shit as i do - tube embed scrapper , and it's absurd to send DMCA to tube scrapper, as if content is already removed on original tube, then it does not exist anymore on any tube which embed it.

Bladewire 05-20-2017 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 21780895)
What he is running probably same shit as i do - tube embed scrapper , and it's absurd to send DMCA to tube scrapper, as if content is already removed on original tube, then it does not exist anymore on any tube which embed it.

In this case you know the content creator wants the content down and eventually you're going to have a placeholder image that, when clicked, is going to go to an error message that it's no longer available.

So either you remove/change your "link" and the content lives on with the host until the owner eventually​ figures out who the host is.

Or you keep the "link" on your site and have to deal with whatever bullshit the content owner or DMCA company throws your way.

I personally like to fly under the radar and stay focused on making money. Fighting DMCA's and drawing attention to myself with content creators is not my focus or desire.

If they don't see it after the DMCA they are happy. Very simple right?

Klen 05-21-2017 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21781264)
In this case you know the content creator wants the content down and eventually you're going to have a placeholder image that, when clicked, is going to go to an error message that it's no longer available.

So either you remove/change your "link" and the content lives on with the host until the owner eventually​ figures out who the host is.

Or you keep the "link" on your site and have to deal with whatever bullshit the content owner or DMCA company throws your way.

I personally like to fly under the radar and stay focused on making money. Fighting DMCA's and drawing attention to myself with content creators is not my focus or desire.

If they don't see it after the DMCA they are happy. Very simple right?

In my case it's only placeholder text, so sending a DMCA for a mere text , without any actual content is absurd and it's case of automated DMCA scanner where they dont bother to check does offending site actually have offending content or not.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc