GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New American Warship U.S.S. Billings Launched Today Headed to South Korea ( video ) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1269892)

Bladewire 07-02-2017 03:45 PM

New American Warship U.S.S. Billings Launched Today Headed to South Korea ( video )
 

USS Billings is a Freedom-class littoral combat ship of the United States Navy. It will be the first ship in naval service named after Billings, Montana.






mineistaken 07-02-2017 03:50 PM

Thanks, Donald.

Bladewire 07-02-2017 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21866659)
Thanks, Donald.

Oh it started being made in 2013. You're an idiot thanking Obama, your negro nemisis in your motherland Slovakia

mineistaken 07-02-2017 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21866674)
Oh it started being made in 2013. You're an idiot thanking Obama, your negro nemisis in your motherland Slovakia

Lol, clown shoes takes phrase "Thanks, Donald" literally :thumbsup:1orglaugh


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

BaldBastard 07-02-2017 04:15 PM

Can it detect a merchant boat heading towards it at 4 knots, without it splitting the boat in two?

Seems to be the current major problem

pimpmaster9000 07-02-2017 04:25 PM

USIS deploys its new weapon for terrorism...in other news Al akbr el azzizzi came out with a new line of IED- s that go boom more than the previous models...stay tuned for more global military protection racket news!

DraX 07-02-2017 04:32 PM

Looking good, Kim Jung Un will shit his pants when he see's it...:1orglaugh

More of a personal wish than reality though...

Rochard 07-02-2017 04:38 PM

These ships are ideal for special forces....

Bladewire 07-02-2017 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21866716)
These ships are ideal for special forces....

Indeed




Look Chang 07-02-2017 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21866692)
Can it detect a merchant boat heading towards it at 4 knots, without it splitting the boat in two?

Seems to be the current major problem

Unfortunately, it's an actual concern.

Bladewire 07-02-2017 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Look Chang (Post 21866842)
Unfortunately, it's an actual concern.

It's not actually

Barry-xlovecam 07-02-2017 07:11 PM

Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

pimpmaster9000 07-03-2017 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21866905)
Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

Oh yes starve them LOL they are there for the USA to starve if the USA feels like it...this is why all countries should have nukes or bacteria...

Barry-xlovecam 07-03-2017 04:57 AM

  1. NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.
  2. NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.
  3. If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.
  4. NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.

North Korea's government must die. The common people of NK could be spared if possible but most of them will die if they follow Kim Jong Un to their graves.

pimpmaster9000 07-03-2017 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867364)
[*]NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.

neither is the US government...(insert US invasions since ww2 map here)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867364)
[*]NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.

this is their right...they are under no obligation to do anything the "lesser of 2 evils" US gov and potus want it to do...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867364)
[*]If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.

leave them alone and they wont use WMD...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867364)
[*]NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.[/LIST]

everybody should own nukes...fuck being the next vietnam/korea/iraq/avghanistan etc...you get a right to complain about it when you lead by setting a good example...the USA is the #1 reason most countries are scrambling to develop nukes...3rd world countries are not obliged to be your war games grounds...invaders should not get to feel safe...no reason for this at all...

Paul Markham 07-03-2017 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867364)
  1. NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.
  2. NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.
  3. If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.
  4. NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.

North Korea's government must die. The common people of NK could be spared if possible but most of them will die if they follow Kim Jong Un to their graves.

Unfortunately China is protecting NK. And while China produces all those American goods it's safe.

Bladewire 07-03-2017 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21867808)
Unfortunately China is protecting NK. And while China produces all those American goods it's safe.

NK is China's mask where they can threaten the world through NK with it hurting China's image, but the gig is up. The world is realizing NK is like America's Mexico, but with nukes :2 cents:

Bladewire 07-03-2017 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21866905)
Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

Not war, just take away their toys.

It has to happen, they are a threat to us, constantly threatening us. Not to mentioning delivering that boy braindead.

Barry-xlovecam 07-03-2017 08:34 AM

If the North Korea does what they want within their own borders and does not threaten anyone -- I could care less.

Since the Korean War; no one has invaded NK and no one has bombed NK. North Korea's aggressive military posture and threats are not the reason. Remember Saddam? That was a lose-lose really.

Yes China is the NK 'enabler' but the Chinese are playing a very risky game.

Bladewire 07-03-2017 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867844)
If the North Korea does what they want within their own borders and does not threaten anyone -- I could care less.

Since the Korean War; no one has invaded NK and no one has bombed NK. North Korea's aggressive military posture and threats are not the reason. Remember Saddam? That was a lose-lose really.

Yes China is the NK 'enabler' but the Chinese are playing a very risky game.

We have enough cheap Chinese crap fuck them and teach them about being chicken shit and using NK as their puppet to intimidate us. NK is the only country with nukes sending off missiles constantly saying they're going to nuke us, their nuke capability has to be eliminated or we are going to regret it big time later, like we regret letting China militarize those man-made islands. China is going to fuck us in South China Sea anyway, no need to be nice to those fucks pretending we don't know what's up.

baddog 07-03-2017 10:06 AM

Bladeliar couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it.

The future USS Billings is 83 percent done. It will take about a year and a half of construction before joining the Navy fleet.

Barry-xlovecam 07-03-2017 10:10 AM

Great. America cuts off Chinese trade then China calls in their US Treasury bonds. Trump says NO WAY! The US reneges on repayment (by some EO?) then the US dollar crashes and we all go into a economic depression over a bad mouthed fat-ass boy?

That outcome is not that unlikely under your scheme.
Maybe, I am wrong -- do you think that is an outlandish outcome?

Trump playing gunboat diplomacy is school-kid, hot head diplomacy -- he's not going to scare the Chinese and just end up with a plane forced down like Bush did in 2001. Then Trump will have to back down, humiliated. Or, Trump the Useless will start a shooting war we cannot win because his ego is bruised.

Never fight a war you cannot win. Warfare has been reduced to petty squabbles fought in weak countries for a good reason.

Bladewire 07-03-2017 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21867985)
Great. America cuts off Chinese trade then China calls in their US Treasury bonds. Trump says NO WAY! The US reneges on repayment (by some EO?) then the US dollar crashes and we all go into a economic depression over a bad mouthed fat-ass boy?

That outcome is not that unlikely under your scheme.
Maybe, I am wrong -- do you think that is an outlandish outcome?

Trump playing gunboat diplomacy is school-kid, hot head diplomacy -- he's not going to scare the Chinese and just end up with a plane forced down like Bush did in 2001. Then Trump will have to back down, humiliated. Or, Trump the Useless will start a shooting war we cannot win because his ego is bruised.

Never fight a war you cannot win. Warfare has been reduced to petty squabbles fought in weak countries for a good reason.

Oh ok.

We'll go decades more with China bleeding us dry, taking our jobs & dominance, NK threatening us on China's behalf and China restricting access to the South China Sea.

The Chinese are cowardly thieves and we're empowering them by taking no action, military or otherwise. Reagan fucked us with the Chinese (selling us out) and Russians (prolonging the cold war with needless wasted military buildup). We should have let the Chinese starve now they're like z bunch of rats trying to take over the planet with uncontrolled breeding.

baddog 07-03-2017 10:32 AM


pimpmaster9000 07-03-2017 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21868006)
Oh ok.

We'll go decades more with China bleeding us dry, taking our jobs & dominance, NK threatening us on China's behalf and China restricting access to the South China Sea.

The Chinese are cowardly thieves and we're empowering them by taking no action, military or otherwise. Reagan fucked us with the Chinese (selling us out) and Russians (prolonging the cold war with needless wasted military buildup). We should have let the Chinese starve now they're like z bunch of rats trying to take over the planet with uncontrolled breeding.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh paul markham alert :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

the chineese are literally forcing you to buy their cheap shit and to outsource...ask paul...

Bladewire 07-03-2017 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21868111)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh paul markham alert :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

the chineese are literally forcing you to buy their cheap shit and to outsource...ask paul...

Really! How so?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc