Do you feel the Bern? Grand Jury convened in Sanders probe
 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...=.b66fd3d6de6a

Prosecutors don't take anything to the grand jury unless they know they have a case.

Comtard Bern.

I think you do not understand what a Grand Jury is..


Although grand juries and trial juries are both made up of average people who were called for jury duty, they serve very different purposes. A grand jury determines whether charges should be brought against a suspect, while trial juries give a decision about whose facts they believe in the trial itself.

Grand juries will work closely with the prosecutor, who will explain the law to the jurors. The jurors then have the power to view almost any kind of evidence they wish and to interrogate anyone they like. The procedure for grand jury hearings is very relaxed to allow the jurors as much flexibility as possible. Typically, the parties that appear before the grand jury do not have attorneys, and the rules of evidence allow much more evidence than is allowed at a criminal trial. Grand jury proceedings are held in strict confidence to encourage witnesses to speak freely, as well as to protect the suspect if the grand jury decides not to bring charges.

A grand jury's decision is not the final step in a case. Prosecutors use grand jury proceedings as test-runs for trials and take a grand jury's decision very seriously. However, if the prosecutor strongly disagrees with a grand jury, he or she may ignore the decision.


A grand jury is a "fishing trip" as an attempt to see if they can build a case which a jury will convict. If they had a case right now they wouldn't need a grand jury. The very fact they want a grand jury shows they have a weak case.

The entire purpose of a Grand Jury is to "determine" if charges should be brought. It doesn't mean they have a case. If they had a case they wouldn't "have" to use a grand jury. They would instead make the charges and take it to criminal court. (ie they don't have a case, they just want it to be a case)



Regardless, if they did something wrong we should find out, but I suspect this is just Trump trying to get payback.. :2 cents:

The probe started under Obama. Nice try though..

A probe started but not the threat of grand jury nor FBI investigation. The FBI was not investigating until recently.. This screams very much of Trump pushing the DOJ to further investigate. The DOJ then tells the FBI to look into it..

This is the EXACT shit Nixon did.

You don't know how it works obviously. A investigation begins and if there is enough evidence for a felony offense, then and ONLY then does it go to the grand jury. Investigators and prosecutors don't "consult" grand juries with every case they have to determine who's charged. They consult with them before they bare the expense of a costly trial for felony offenses.

^^ Crockette doesn't really understand how this stuff works, and is easily duped by the fraud news networks into hating Trump and calling for violence against "the Republicans."

I'm not sure if it's the flouride in the water, or eating GMO foods sprayed with pesticides, but it's clear that he's a high-functioning autistic person. :1orglaugh

:pimp

Also, pretty much everywhere in the US there is generally a 3-6 month backlog of cases to be presented to the grand jury. So it's safe to assume this case was made 3-6 months ago. They've just been waiting their turn. Given the facts presented it's pretty obvious what occurred. The only question now is will his fellow politicians help him and her out in some way to get them out of trouble or throw him under the bus like they did during the election?

If I had to guess. They will get a slap on the wrist and he willingly loses his seat.

The OP is so desperate to deflect from the sewage cesspool the Trump family has created that he's obsessing on some obscure investigation initiated by a Republican in 2016 wow.

Onwebcam is proud of Trump Jr. and sees nothing wrong.

Or I just love it when two-faced hypocrites are exposed. Especially politicians.

Maybe. we will see if there is anything to it one way or another. This info was out there before the election BTW, I read about this before Hillary won the nomination. At that time there was nothing more than hearsay which is all we've seen so far..to date. Everything is all based on someone making a complaint..

As I sated in my 1st post, if he did something wrong then we should find out. I have no issues with that, I'm 1000% against any corruption with-in my govt, which is why I'm so ant-Trump. Trump is a corrupt fuck..

Aside from the your article very specifically mentions they are not investigating Bernie Sanders as he's not the target, but rather his wife. So we shall see.

...except they aren't investigating Bernie but rather his wife...

You don't think Trump is a two faced politician do you? You think Trump is doing a great job right?

So you're saying the Trump Jr. & Trump investigations have enough evidence for felony offenses right? Or does this just pertain to Bernie Sanders wife?

You don't know what will come out of a grand jury. Another Senator has publicly stated that Bernie in fact pressured the bank into doing the loan. If that is before the grand jury he WILL indicted as well..

Evidence of what? What is your charge and where is the evidence.?

There is no doubt in loan fraud... It's only a matter of who did it... Considering everyone is pointing the finger a Bernies wife, well... And now people coming about Bernies involvement.

OH! Ok

You think the Trump's are innocent and have done nothing wrong.

You don't think Trump is a two face politician do you?

Innocent of what???

Who is they? Bernie is not even part of the investigation.

Link???? 8 damn char

EVERYONE who committed a felony in this and if that evidence is presented to the grand jury they WILL get indicted. It's not a narrow focus.... It's all encompassing.

You are misrepresenting the facts. The other "guy" you are talking about, was a "lawyer" and he admitted what he said was "hearsay". He admitted he heard it from a guy who had told another guy..



Just the 1st website that came up from the search, but you can literally pick any source you want because all the media reported on that story.

https://vtdigger.org/2017/07/02/sour...dence-hearsay/

The explosive allegation that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., pressured a bank to loan money to a college run by his wife come from a former bank employee with no direct knowledge of the loan.

Republican attorney Brady Toensing sent a letter in May 2016 saying he was approached and informed that Sanders “improperly pressured” People’s United Bank to loan money to Burlington College when the senator’s wife was the school’s president.

Toensing’s source for that information was House Minority Leader Don Turner, R-Milton, a revelation first reported by Seven Days on Friday.

Turner said the allegations arose from a conversation he had with three bankers at a Montpelier restaurant around the time the school closed.

.....


In an interview with VTDigger, Turner declined to name those present, but he said the topic was broached in casual conversation. He repeatedly described what he heard as “hearsay,” because the former People’s United Bank employee was not involved in the loan and was no longer employed at People’s when the conversation took place.

Again we will see how it all plays out. My hunch is Sander's wife was just really bad at management..

I think it is political, as in, if Clinton had been elected Sanders may have been able to pull strings and force her to soft peddle the investigation.

The whole thing started before Trump, and Trump couldn't care less about it.

This is a clear case of "is there evidence of a crime" or is it a civil matter. In a civil case, no one would press it because essentially there is no plaintiff.

The grand jury is in place because of the very public nature of the defendant. The prosecutor knows his ass is on the line unless the case is airtight and he wins. Sanders will come after them full force with the political witch hunt accusation, though that is clearly absolute bullshit.

Actually the Sanders family appears to be unified in its philosophy:

Promise everything to get what you want and have no fucking idea of how you'll deliver. Hey, don't feel bad angry white young male socialists! Even a bank believed the bullshit. That you were fooled is no big deal.

If Sanders had kept his mouth shut, we might have president Clinton right now.

LOL do you know how easy it is to indict someone? Ever hear the saying about a ham sandwich and indictments?

That seemed to have worked well for the potus.

That's what people get in return for asking simple questions to get to know your opinion about Trump investigations. You're fucked in the head stupid and get what you deserve for running people around in circles asshole.

You think "POTUS" is working out well :1orglaugh:1orglaugh or was that sarc? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Indictment doesn't make them guilty. It just means it's going to court... 99.9% of all grand juries lead to indictments, but not every indictment leads to a conviction..

It's almost 100% certain his wife will be indited, if they have a grand jury, but that doesn't mean the later trial will convict.

You're fucked in the head delusional dumbass :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh what southern fucknut you are can't focus on Trump crashing gotta dream for a Bernie scandal because Trump fucked you on locking Clinton up you dumbass :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Trump's not doing shit to save you from your Obomacare tax issues either sucker :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

re-read the line I quoted and get back to me.

Answer the question and I'll get back to you

maybe you should smarten your dumbass up & look at the conviction rate for federal indictments. but of course once again you make a comment in ignorance of facts. as usual.

idiot dumbfuck.

:1orglaugh

Boozer and Onwebcam won't answer questions complete waste of time, one way communication loser nics.

I did not realize I had to answer to you.

Your board antics have gotten tiresome. You and Joshua G just need to fuck and get it over with.

Take a good look at this and you will understand why Trump and Sanders are being targeted by the system.

http://cdn-04.belfasttelegraph.co.uk...n-finances.jpg

Fuck off loser. I asked you a simple question and you want to play games answering, talk about "antics" what a waste of time. Clearing you have no substance to offer "boozer"

Trump is being targeted because he's a liar and a con artist, plain and simple. $25 million for federal class action consumer fraud suit $750k for federal anti trust suit... Just those two lawsuits show you can't trust Trump and he fucks over the little guy. Nothing to do with a "shadow system" it's all on the up and up and out in the open, as his lies are uncovered from his biggest scam if all, like pealing an onion.

What kind of gibberish is this?