GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Apparently the Joint Chiefs were not aware (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1273189)

Steve Rupe 07-27-2017 10:48 AM

Apparently the Joint Chiefs were not aware
 
The Joint Chiefs as well the Head of the Joint Chiefs were not aware that trump intended to ban Transgenders from the military. Didn't the Donald state that upon the advice of his Generals he was initiating the ban. Isn't just another lie of the Donald's.

Steve Rupe 07-27-2017 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21916348)
The Joint Chiefs as well the Head of the Joint Chiefs were not aware that trump intended to ban Transgenders from the military. Didn't the Donald state that upon the advice of his Generals he was initiating the ban. Isn't just another lie of the Donald's.

BTW, I am in favor of not allowing Transgenders into the military as well as gays and women. If women want to serve then reinstate the WAC's and the other womens branches, such as the WAVES etc.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:14 AM

Nobody cares who you're "in favor" of judging as less than you.

BaldBastard 07-27-2017 11:41 AM

Bill Browder basically confirmed collusion so Trumpers had to drop a distracting bomb.
Fox news is desperately trying to spin it, suggest you watch its great listening.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21916531)
Bill Browder basically confirmed collusion so Trumpers had to drop a distracting bomb.
Fox news is desperately trying to spin it, suggest you watch its great listening.

Bill Browser laid it all out. It's a shame Kushner was using that encrypted app for untraceable texts.

?Splinter has confirmed that Kushner downloaded an encrypted messaging application that permits users to send disappearing messages,? Kashmir Hill reports. ?The use of the app by White House officials has the potential to undermine the Presidential Records Act.?

BaldBastard 07-27-2017 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916567)
Bill Browser laid it all out. It's a shame Kushner was using that encrypted app for untraceable texts.

It certainly sounded like there were follow up meetings when Browder was asked what would confirm collusion and he said follow up meetings. Then it was made clear, he was not aware of any and only said that because he didn't have clearance to the evidence that had been given already. Which certainly hinted at.. there was, just not public knowledge.

onwebcam 07-27-2017 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916567)
Bill Browser laid it all out. It's a shame Kushner was using that encrypted app for untraceable texts.

“Splinter has confirmed that Kushner downloaded an encrypted messaging application that permits users to send disappearing messages,” Kashmir Hill reports. “The use of the app by White House officials has the potential to undermine the Presidential Records Act.”

Did he mention how Natalia Veselnitskaya entered the US or how she was affiliated with the "fake dossier" or that her facebook page was filled with anti-Trump and pro-Clinton shit or that SHE invited another Russian democrat operative affiliated with the dossier to join her in the meeting?

Bladewire 07-27-2017 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21916582)
It certainly sounded like there were follow up meetings when Browder was asked what would confirm collusion and he said follow up meetings. Then it was made clear, he was not aware of any and only said that because he didn't have clearance to the evidence that had been given already. Which certainly hinted at.. there was, just not public knowledge.

Yeah they have to slowly roll out their findings so the public can digest them. All governments have to do it like this unfortunately. Trump knows that they know , that's why he's hitting so hard on Sessions. Trump has all the top secret reports and knows what they know, or what they let him know they know.

BaldBastard 07-27-2017 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916594)
Did he mention how Natalia Veselnitskaya entered the US or how she was affiliated with the "fake dossier" or that her facebook page was filled with anti-Trump and pro-Clinton shit or that SHE invited another Russian democrat operative affiliated with the dossier to join her in the meeting?

It all came out if you care to listen.

What you and others need to get out of your head that this is a witch hunt. Its not, it about finding out how and working out how to prevent a foreign government from interfering in your elections. Trump is president, he's the one doing the damage to your country right now and everything is pointing at that he's fully compromised.

So that should be priority one, get the truth and the facts, then sure see how deep the rabbit hole goes and oust them all.

Joshua G 07-27-2017 01:55 PM

& who reported this OP...CNN?

duped again.

people call them the "fake news network" for a reason. You should catch up OP. believing their fake news makes you look dumb.

:1orglaugh

Steve Rupe 07-27-2017 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21916789)
& who reported this OP...CNN?

duped again.

people call them the "fake news network" for a reason. You should catch up OP. believing their fake news makes you look dumb.
of the
:1orglaugh

h

Heard it and saw it come out of the mouth of the Head of the Joint Chiefs. Ninety percent, or more, of my news comes from C-Span and I have not been a viewer of CNN since the 1st Gulf war and Bernie Shaw. I will not ignore you on this comment.

Joshua G 07-27-2017 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21916876)
h

Heard it and saw it come out of the mouth of the Head of the Joint Chiefs. Ninety percent, or more, of my news comes from C-Span and I have not been a viewer of CNN since the 1st Gulf war and Bernie Shaw. I will not ignore you on this comment.

well then you have no clue how to interpret words that came out of the chiefs mouth.

specifically, he said...

?There will be no modifications to the current policy until the President's direction has been received by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary has issued implementation guidance.?

that does not mean he was not aware of the policy change...which is what you claimed.

steve rube.

:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc