1 question that shuts up anti-abortion people?
 

https://www.boredpanda.com/pro-life-...ck-s-tomlinson

Just 1 simple question.

Patrick is my new hero!

I used to live a block from a small medical center. One office performed abortions. Daily protests, harassment and more. I went by daily on my paper route.

I'd go in to deliver papers, age fourteen and looked it, and I'd be harassed.


"Baby killer!!."

"I'm delivering a newspaper."

"You should be delivering a baby not killing it."

"I was taught to ignore rude people. The only thing I'm killing is time with you when I have to deliver dead trees."

Applause from the pro-choice crowd (I'm a member).

The abortion clinic is still there

What an idiotic example. Embryos can not develop outside of the freezer. Its not the same, morons. :1orglaugh Its chemistry in the bulb.

"There are about 15 different types of contraceptives which allow you to enjoy sex without the risk of getting pregnant."

Source:
https://www.dred.com/uk/types-of-contraceptives.html

In this day and age of sex education in schools, unlimited information about contraception on the internet, and over a dozen methods of contraception available to anyone...unwanted pregnancies should be something unheard of.

If we could somehow put a stop to unwanted pregnancies, that in and of itself would solve the abortion issue.

Easily available abortion is how the juice keeps women slaving in the workforce.

20 years after roe Vs Wade a sharp drop in crime occured in the USA...

One day the USA will be free as my 3rd world shit hole and abortions will be a non issue...

Anti-abortion people will never shut up because stupid people never shuts up.

the simplest answer is let those with ovaries decide :2 cents:

like Clinton people?

The pro-lifers are only pro-birth. Afterwards, they want nothing to do with the children.

I thought abortion was legal in the US anyway? What's the issue?

WTF fool? :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...

You nailed it. The scenario is already loaded. Is the conclusion that big of a surprise?

Can't wait to see all of the geniuses around here try to dismantle his argument.

No...you're the idiot. A frozen embryo is viable to become a human life eventually. You're straw manning it.

Bingo, well spotted :thumbsup

Not preaching for one side or the other, but reality will set in.

Pro-abortion:

https://i.imgur.com/iEt8hVv.jpg


Anti-abortion:

https://i.imgur.com/PCqtyVk.jpg


Do the math.

It's not hard to see where this is headed.





.

DUM........ with out a mother to bring the embryo to term is not the same as a baby.......... that guys just a ASS.

I believe the moment a baby takes its first breath, the gasp of air when born, this is the moment our soul enters our body & we are born :thumbsup

Nice one! I believe in freedom of choice and deciding what you want to do with your life. Just because I have ovaries, doesn't mean I have to give birth unless I want to.

That "eventually" is called MOTHER. Mother with uterus, not a tranny with flower shaped penis, dumb ass. How many people who popped out of pickle jar do you know?
Why don't you argue that people should be able to abort toddlers as well since they ruin someone's body by drinking milk and making tits saggy.

Your life, not some one else's. :2 cents:

:thumbsup:thumbsup

</thread>

amazing to hear you´re happy for someone to choose whether to have an abortion, understanding that a baby, a human life is created only once born...

and yet, you think transexuals or people considering their sexuality is wrong.

The question can't be presented without some hypothetical supposition. Since you don't agree with the truth you're unwilling to speak by answering the question, you choose to create a straw man argument instead. Have a little imagination to properly entertain and answer the question, instead of obfuscating a way around it. Yes or no.

All is said. :stoned

The simple answer is yes or no. You can't make the choice between the embryos or the child so you just act indifferent.

To be 100% honest if the five year old in the analogy was one of those punk-ass shaggy-haired smug little spoiled brats known as American kids I'd probably grab the embryos.

I choose : 1) without question.

The truth is you don't know one single person who came out of a pickle jar and thats why you didn't answer my question. The truth is in vitro fertilization gives less that 20% of success. For most its far less and close to zero. No sperm can survive with out uterus. Not one. The truth is, above example is dumber than Paul Markham and Brassmonkey combined. So go ahead, use dumb ass examples for your sake of arguments. Thats a YES.

Good find, easy to answer for someone like myself who's standing on the ground with my two feet.

A)

A different answer at the bottom

https://twitter.com/TroyBorst/status/920844547038633985

I'm not going to waste my time with you. You are probably having some anti-abortion banners to make. :2 cents:

Hey dickhead. A frozen embryo is live tissue and able to be implanted in a uterus. You're the one who is dumb, because you can't accept the parameters of an analogy to answer a question as a yes or no answer. It's beyond the scope of what you can conceive. Or you just avoid answering yes or no -- as every other pro-lifer would.

Hey shit for brains. You need a uterus to compare embryo to a living child. Get it dumb fuck? You missing one thing in your equation.
How many dumb fucks like you was born in a pickle jar? Are you the only one?

I have porn to sell. Spread it.

Tl;dr

My question: do you hold all races to the same standards, or is it only white babies you wish to abort?

I am for abortion hard-core.

So then the answer is "yes I would save the living child because I can't entertain the idea of an analogy, but if the embryos were inside of women I would save them".

You're a fucking asshole.

No, the answer is you are a fucking idiot for comparing apples to your dirty shit stained underwear. If your mother took embryos up her ass we wouldn't have this conversation right now, because uterus in on the other side of her body.
Are you really that fucking stupid?

Some people should't have babies, period. Look at bronko69 up above. breeding morons should be illegal. So I am pro choice but for different reasons.

Ok, so the answer is save the child.

Given the parameters that you're willing to accept ---which is that it's not possible to have this scenario ---means you would save the child, because embryos can't exist outside a uterus. We all know that embryo's can be frozen, but you can ignore that fact if you'd like.

When it comes to the general argument of what constitutes a human life, pro-lifers see it as starting at the embryonic stage -- whether or not it's inside or outside a woman's body. You keep calling me dumb, but you just keep avoiding the question by pretending to be unable to use a little imagination for the sake of an analogy. You should go look up the word, you dipshit.

It's so hard for you to answer this simple question, you devolve into histrionics to distract from the fact that you're avoiding giving a straight answer.

how convenient..lol

i am not trying to take the choice out of desperate peoples hands...rape victims etc

but abortion as birth control is fucked up

It artificially fertilized. Artificially. Get it, dumb fuck? There is no life if you don't put in womans ovaries. They are gone.. Simply gone. They can't grow, they can't survive. Its a chemistry. Man made chemistry, moron. Thats why when docs do IVF they put shit tone of eggs inside because most or all will never become a baby. There isn't a child to child comparison in your dumb ass example. There aren't 200 children in that jar.
Most hardcore religious people don't even believe in artificial insemination, just like they don't believe in cloning. I am done with your stupid ass.