I suspect Mueller's charges will be against the Donald's former head of the NSC.
 

Michael T. Flynn.

Manifort and Podesta are probably fair game. I don't know about Flynn.

You keep trying.

Podesta testified he didn't know who funded the research with his lawyer present. Here's the catch, his lawyers law firm retained Fusion GPS to do the research.. I guess we can call that client attorney privilege?

You've been poo poo'ing what Clinon and the DNC have now admittedly done here but when it was supposedly Trump's doing it was treasonous. What's up with that?

You live in world where the things you think are news are not news.

Monday is going to be fun.

A wise man wrote a book about your World in 1949. It's called 1984. There's a movie as well since you have trouble with reading comprehension.

I guess you missed the news about how it was a conservative website who funded the research which started the dossier and it was only later shopped to the DNC and Clinton..

Regardless of who paid for it, much of its been proven to be correct but please carry on with your fantasy of how Hillary will go to jail.. :1orglaugh


Here Ill even post the link from fox news...


Conservative website funded initial Fusion GPS Trump opposition effort | Fox News

"At some point after that, Fusion GPS was retained by Mark Elias"



Sitting next to Podesta during the interview: his attorney Marc Elias, who worked for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS to continue research on Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC, multiple sources said. Elias was only there in his capacity as Podesta’s attorney and not as a witness.

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/10/...elias-present/

Why is there always another potential witness involved in these questionings? Same shit happened during Clinton's investigation.

Pretty sure the Beacon stopped it's "research" payments because they figured out it was a bunch of BS.

And again, of course parts of it are true,, It pretty fucking easy to Google Trumps visits to Russia and then all you have to do is toss in some pissing hooker and there you have it. There was no information in it that couldn't be found online. Nothing except pee-peegate and that's why it's dubbed that.

I figured it was McCain but instead it was McCain's backer

Funding of the institute comes from a variety of individuals, foundations, and corporations, including Wal-Mart Stores, FedEx, Saudi Arabia,[2] and hedge fund owner Paul E. Singer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain_Institute

Singer owns the Beacon.

Flynt or Kush or Manafort, doesn't matter. The real prize is the dirty-don himself, who'll hopefully be hitting the clink sooner than later.

Don't get your hopes up. Anything a court does can be appealed. Highest appeal is the Supreme Court, which can take any case.

You already have them convicted and appealing :)

Got some inside info?

So you are adament that a political group paying someone to write a report on another political group is a crime ?

I think you will struggle to argue that it is even unusual, never mind wrong in any way.



........and all this outrage about the dems paying for the report breaks just as Mueller starts signing off on the warrarnts......

Keep on lapping it up Trumpsters.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You seem to forget that your outrage is suppose to be over the very same thing. Literally every single thing the left has pinned on Trump without proof they have actually done.

The Russians in the infamous meeting worked for the same company that created the dossier...
Every single person involved in Uranium One which is actual collusion with Russia also happens to be the very same Democrats not only pushing but investigating Trump's "Russia collusion"

Who the fuck cares?

Here we go again. When the "email scandal" thing broke open everyone knew it was just not illegal to use a private email server to send classified information. It was common, a lot of people were doing it; Republicans were doing it but we never investigated that. This is the same shit. Its not illegal to do opposition research, in fact, it's very common. In fact, if they didn't opposition research it would be rather odd.

Who the fuck cares? This was opposition research. Every candidate does this. It's not illegal. Of course someone at the DNC or the Clinton campaign paid for it.

Let's have an investigation.

You seem to care that the Trump campaign met with the very same people in the infamous meeting... Only they didn't hire the Russian political hit team like the Dems did. Trumps people had a meeting with them, didn't hire them and that's treasonous. The Democrats actually hired them and have tried to sell us on the fake shit for a year but "that's nothing"

I'm sorry, who did the Trump campaign meet with?

Did the Clinton people meet up with Natalia Veselnitskaya? And then hide it?
Did the Clinton people meet up with Sergey Kislyak? And then hide it? And then lie about it under oath?

You want proof of collusion? Okay, sure. We can start with Jeff Sewssions and Sergey Kislyak. Jeff Sessions lied about the meeting, and said he never met him. In fact, he lied under oath about this. Seems he met with Sergey Kislyak THREE TIMES. Then he claimed he didn't discuss the election campaign with Sergey Kislyak. It seems he lied about this too. The best part is that Sergey Kislyak reported back to Moscow what Jeff Sessions told him - which was intercepted by the US intelligence community. We have direct evidence that a high ranking member of the Trump campaign was directly communicating with the Russian government - and then lying about it under oath.

Should I go on?

OK Rochard, you claim it's just opposition research. While that's partially true, sending it to the media and intel agencies to launch a fake investigation is a crime. So is not reporting the huge expense to aquire the fake dossier. Donors must be pleased, LOL!

Also, if it was just opposition research, then you should have no problem with Don Jr. meeting with a lawyer who claimed she had intel on Hillary. Right?

The lawyer turned out to be full of shit and was a democratic operative. "OMG treason, impeach!" LOL!!

:pimp

MEDIA, DEMS IGNORE HILLARY UKRAINE COLLUSION

:pimp

I don't know how many times I have to tell you Rochard. Natalia Veselnitskaya worked for Fusion GPS. I've told you that at least 50 times over the past year. She invited others to join her in the meeting. She was there on behalf of Fusion GPS offering their smear services.

Hes way too far gone to talk sense into,. Hes in some right wing conspiracy lala land.

Just imagine how outraged you'd be if you held Trump and his admin as accountable as you hold Hillary,..


Just imagine....

You certainly are a dumb fuck, aren't you?

Hilary Clinton had a good joke today. She said, "Fox News thinks I'm in the White House."

he's going to get nailed. One of his minions will crack.

That's why they "leaked" the story about charges on a Friday. They wanted the potential targets to be sweating bullets Saturday and Sunday, then come clean on Monday to get a deal and turn over the Great Orange One.

Seven investigations later in to Hillary and they still only have conspiracy websites.

The very first investigations into Trump and arrest warrants have been issued...

In fact its so fucking bad even the conspiracy websites don't know who's going down because there are so many potentially guilty on team Trump.

Scaryist thing of all being deflected is Trump visiting Asia, one big weapons & snake oil caravan sale.

Paul Manafort was asked to surrender this morning.

This ain't over by a long shot :2 cents:

Right, Mike Dense ?

It sure isn't, Manafort conspiring against the US during the Obama admin? WOW :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Podesta is shitting bricks right now.

George Papadopoulos lied about Trump meeting with top Russian officials and secretly pleaded guilty

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...pleaded-guilty

Manafort not only tried to destroy the campaign but it continued on past..

Scumbags will be scumbags.

Now try to fix blame on Hilliary next -- like your orange idol does:laughing-

Why else would anyone be trying to sabotage Trump? You think sweet little old $145 million Hillary had no idea? Did Russia do it? You were wrong again, all along? How does crow taste the second time?

That's the way, we became https://scontent.fbna1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...f5&oe=5A7355E7

It's not "partially true". It's opposition research. EVERY candidate does it.

The difference between hiring a research firm to do opposition research and getting support and information from a foreign government is staggering.

What's the difference between one side doing it all and blaming the other? :1orglaugh

Hillary: "Mommy, Donald ate some of the cake"
Mommy: "Oh really? Come here, let me wipe that chocolate off your mouth."