Serious question. How do you think Trump would have dealt with Bin Laden's death ??
 

Had he been in position at the time...

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/23/46/d9/2...conspiracy.jpg


No trolls. K thanks. :upsidedow

And, IIRC, it also took place at the same time as a royal wedding / birth, which meant many of the world were looking the other way...

he would say he have strangled him with his own hands.....

I always wondered why the Obama administration handled it the way they did. It makes people suspicious.

Hard to say Trump would be more transparent if we don't know the reason behind the Obama administration being so secretive about it.

who knows...

i am pretty sure that they did not throw him in the ocean - they would be idiot to do that.

but i am also sure that they did not want to show the picture of a dead muslim to the whole world and produce more hate and they did not want to have a target with his dead body but would make millions of muslims angry because that would prevent he goes to "paradise".

He would have tweeted from the shitter and how great he is and got him plus something about his policy

They got rid of the body to avoid having any kind of shrine or memorial for him. They did it quickly to ensure there was no public discussion about it.

What does anyone think "really happened"? They kept him alive and have him in a secret prison somewhere?

Obama had him flown to his secret home in Africa with plans of opening a chain of ice cream stores as soon as Obama can scrounge up enough money from giving speeches at libtard colleges.

hard to say because of the media attention difference between the 2 presidents. anything obama did was correct and anything trump does is shit... at least the media guys aren't bigots :2 cents::2 cents:

Believe he's dead but, the whole "nothing to see here" ?!!?!

Nah...

He would have called him a good guy and friend just like his best pal Flynn

I think that liberals would still find a way to complain about him, lol.

Yes. Bronco67 already claimed that EVERY SINGLE decission by Trump is and will be incorrect one.

Economy is booming, jobs at all time high, unemployment all time low, ISIS on the run, etc but he's Hitler! :1orglaugh

I heard those same things when Obama was president, except he was from Kenya.


:1orglaugh

Except economy is doing better, jobs are way up and unemployment is way down

Trump > Obama

this has less to do with Trump or Obama than any American will want to admit regardless of what side they are on. the economy of any first world nation, absent of any ridiculously influential outside forces, (like a world war) is and always will be cyclical. it is based on animal nature, (not human nature), to consume at a level that reflects supply as opposed to a level that reflects necessity. Compounded by adjustments to variables that are far too large and far too late.

Animal nature because it is the exact same in the wild with fragile ecosystems, for example the fox and the rabbit who's numbers are cyclical and inversely proportional to each other. When there are a lot of rabbits, foxes breed more and feed more, they act in a manner that reflects the supply of food. Eventually there are not enough rabbits to sustain the fox population and they start to die off. As the foxes are dying off, but are still to plentiful to be sustained by the rabbit population, the rabbit population is fucking like, well, like rabbits to try and keep their numbers up. eventually the rabbit population explodes and the cycle starts over. If the Rabbits never felt the need to alter the cycle by fucking more, and the foxes never had the urge to change the variables by eating more and wasting meat, then the cycle would be less pronounced, but this would go against animal nature.

Our economy, (not just the US economy) went through some very tough times almost 10 years ago, regardless of who was president, the economy was going to recover. The variable we fuck with to effect change is the cost of borrowing money. When the market tanked, we dropped interest to near 0%, we gave people free money to stimulate consumption. Like all stimulus, it was as always, to much and to late. You can see the effect, the Market exploded. Interest should have gone back up in 2011, but like I said, it is animal nature to ride out the good times then be reactive once shit hits the fan.

Over the next few years, interest will continue to climb because even though the adverse effects seem obvious, policy makers are paid to make changes, not to say "change will create an over-correction, the cycle will correct itself". Plus interest is in fact to low.

I think the reality is, you can not thank Obama for turning the market around, and you can not thank Trump for the fact that it is still rolling. At best you can thank Obama for not forcing anyone to do anything stupid enough to force a prolonged recession while he was in office. To this point I don't think you can thank Trump for much of anything yet. Should the interest rates increase in the next couple years to a minimum of 3.5% and should the economy subsequently continue to thrive for an extended period of time under Trump, then you can thank him, or his policy makers for not over correcting. If history tells us anything, the economy will soon turn and Trump will take the blame regardless.

Overlay historical interest rates from 1980 over the DJIE for the same time period. Interest rate hikes and cuts are always reactionary and they always go to far. Possibly because doing it slower would cause the next president to get more credit than the one who was in office when the changes needed to be made, possibly because we the people demand instant satisfaction, possibly because our governments do not want to see us suffer, Most likely because finance ministers and Reserve Chairmen are much more worried about keeping their jobs than they are about the long term stability of a country. This isn't a US economy issue, it is a world economy issue, and your president / former president, had little to do with it.

Fuck, just as I hit "post" I thought to myself, "I just put to much thought into responding to a troll post didn't I", ah well, live and learn.

Are you saying Hitler didn't turn the German economy around? :1orglaugh

None of these things have anything to do with Trump. Not one of them.

Unemployment had been on a downward trend for over seventy months before Trump took office.

Trump did nothing to defeat ISIS other than what Obama had been doing.

very intelligent words !

you forget that his "truth" is the 40% real unemployment rate trump told the americans one month before he got to oval office. and suddenly the 4,5% unemployment rate was a result of trumps existence without doing a thing as to play golf.

and you forgot also that in HIS reality the chines have been the worst enemies of US til trump did the holy fish feeding with xi and now the chinese are best friends and all is still the same.

actually i think even the fish did not want to eat from his hand that´s because he throw all food at once.

really in the start and even on the election day i was able to understand particially the frustration of americans who voted for him. but who is STILL not cured from this walking
diarrhea is incurable sick in his head.

Fishgate was total fake news made up by the NY times and CNN...its while Ill never trust them again

Unemployment is way down since Obama left...facts are facts

A kill was ordered by the president. They didn't want or need the circus of a trial with the amazing security issues it would entail. He was buried at sea to prevent a shrine being made in his honor.

If Bin Laden was alive, wouldn't he have loved to let everyone know that the US failed to get him?

Think about that for a moment. Why would the US government lie about killing Bin Laden unless they had actually killed him? Why would they get Obama to make that historic announcement on live television and then have him pop up a month or a year later to disprove it all?

I guarantee you he would have done or said something to inflame the muslim world directly after Bin Laden's death. Trump has no class. Obama does. You wouldn't know the difference.

If you can't see the difference between these two men, then there's no way it could ever be explained to you. May as well try explaining calculus to a dog.

You know who else hasn't produced Bin Laden's body?

Bin Laden.

did you learn a little bit maths in school?

after the big bag in 2010 the uneployment rate in US was 9,9 %

in this 7 years under obama the unemplyment rate went down to 4,8 %

means: every month under obama the unemplyment rate sunk in average 0,06%

since trump the unemployment rate sunk to 4.7 %

this is 0,1% in 10 months or 0,01% per months.

so where is the unemployment rate "way down" since trump ???

he went into the oval office when the unemplyment rate in US was on a HISTORCIAL low
(a little bit lower was this rate in the beginning 50s the last time)

https://www.welt.de/img/wirtschaft/m...nquote-jpg.jpg

Yup. The fact they had to stoop so low yet again for something like that sums them all up.

A nothing story edited again to create yet another "omg look what Trump just did" again is simply pathetic...

There were pictured of bin ladens corpse released the 1st day he was announced dead.. just 20 seconds on google would have shown you half of your meme was fake... then the who sailor non sense..

You are willfully falling for fake Russian propaganda.. congrats..

To justify this thread's creation and existence, you would first need to establish that Donald Trump can actually "deal" with situations, as opposed to stumbling blindly into them. Nothing is going to be dealt with the when the dealer can't deal for shit.

I asked a fairly simple question.

Wasn't asking what did actually happen, just how Trump would have done things at that time had he been in charge in people's opinion...

that's 5.8 years meaning trends were started in the bush administration :2 cents:

How he would execute the plan or get rid of the body? Or both?

It's not possible for anything as clever as the hunting, locating and killing of Bin Laden to be orchestrated by that group of amateurs and the government they manage. The real work was done under Obama's watch, even after there was a torturing prisoners ban initiated -- which actually may have ended up helping.

If they did manage to get in and out of Pakistan without also killing all of Bin Laden's neighbors I'm sure Trump would have told his military to display the body in some way humiliating to Muslims and make millions of new terrorist at that moment. He'll possibly be creating the future Jihadist who finally gets a nuke into a major US city.

Oddly enough these people are no longer talking about the "real unemployment rate".

Remember this?



For all you conservative dickheads...how hard was it to stomach this guy getting to announce the death of Bin Laden, instead of a dumb cowboy? Bittersweet.

Comments are disabled on YouTube because it would be 10 miles of the most vile comments on the internet, all directed at Obama for being the one who got him.

IDK. But one thing is for sure. Trump would have stooped to calling Bin Laden a "radical Islamic terrorist." :disgust Someone please explain to me how he can get away with such slurs.

What difference does it make? His own People have said he was killed. Had he not they wouldn't have said that.

Pretty sure he would have actually killed him.

I haven't questioned if he was killed or not...

1/2 the people in the world have IQs below 100. One proof of that is that this thread even exists. How can we get answers and solutions when people are asking the wrong questions. The world is totally, completely, fucked.

It was like that black CNN reporter who asked "Do any people in the Trump administration support slavery?" like wtf :1orglaugh

again a lie - for me it is not clear whether you are aware of lies or just too stupid to do a research about the question what was asked

That's still a stupid question.