20-year-old sues Dick's, Walmart over new gun policies
 

well well well wtf did i say?!! :1orglaugh :thumbsup:thumbsup

college money!!

The lawsuits, obtained by The Associated Press, are believed to be the first filed over the new gun policies. Oregon law allows residents to buy shotguns or rifles starting at 18. Tyler Watson's lawsuits, which were filed against the retailers in Jackson and Josephine counties, both ask a judge to put a stop to the retailers' new gun sale policies and award punitive damages because of the "willful nature of the discrimination."

On Tuesday, the state Bureau of Labor and Industries said in a letter to state legislative leaders that the bureau would accept complaints from Oregonians who feel they have been discriminated against by the policies.

Without commenting on the merits of Watson's lawsuits, Commissioner Brad Avakian said state law currently only allows for age-related exemptions for alcohol and marijuana sales. The bureau will present a bill to add a similar age restriction for gun sales to the legislature next year for consideration, he said, adding that the policies seemed "appropriate" because they attempted to make public spaces safer.

article...

I'm curious how these types of suits will turn out. There are 15 states that have laws requiring a person to be 21 to buy a pistol and two states that require you to be 21 to buy a rifle. I wonder why those states haven't been sued before?

I support the gun regulations but age discrimination is not the right way to go about it. I've never supported no drinking till 21 and so on. If you are an adult at 18 then they shouldn't be able to limit drinking, guns or whatever.. If you can make the decision to join the military and get killed fighting then you shouldn't be looked at as a child when it comes to drinking ect..

The regulation needs to come by way of background checks with mental health assessments and some sort of licensing that requires a few hurdles to get assault rifles and high capacity clips or to buy the ammo.

Because it wasn't a hot topic in the news..

remember some of these people buying the guns are militias and military. the kid that did the shooting in florida is hurt inside. what is crazy he has money! no need to work! he has over $800,000+ :helpme goes to show you money can't take away the pain. his adoptive mother paid 50 grand to adopt him. he really paid her back in embarrassment and shock. that been said buy guns!

we are about to be at the shores of a civil war. we may be months out before you see militias start to test the waters.

The right wing nutters are not starting a civil war.. They will continue to suicide by cop with these one off shootings.. Largely they are cowards who play internet though guys while encouraging the real nuts who actually buy into the BS and go shoot people..

The right wingers like onwebcam are like the Muslim extremist who convince teenagers to go blow themselves up while being too scared to lift a finger themselves..

So the logic here is that people under 21 lack the maturity to use firearms responsibly...

Ok, then that means people under 21 should not have the right to vote then too, right?

And yet the left wants to let 5 years olds choose their own gender. What a bunch of lunatics :1orglaugh

:rasta

you don't have to just shoot people. there are stages before... did you fall asleep in history class??? there are protest. then there is government being violent with protesters. then you are headed to a much more better place. :)

you can't buy a gun at walmart... you can sign up for the military and go kill strangers! under 21 baby!

State law is one thing, store policy is another.

He sued them, because shooting them wasn't an option with the guns locked behind the counter.

yeah he was thinking hurt them. the wallet will be more effective :2 cents::2 cents:

As long as the store/vendor has their policy publicly posted you can't force them to sell to you. Just like stores that are closed on Sundays. Google it

you better lawyer up dogg. i told you guys in the other thread.
from a real lawyer!!
A company's policy cannot conflict with the minimum requirements of federal or state law.
https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/c...w-2203943.html

It's called the "right to refuse service" bro. Think along the lines of "No shirt, no shoes, no service".

18-20 year olds are not a protected class of citizens.

that's excluding law dogg. if i go to buy cigs at target they cant say you have to be 21. it's not law. stores are regulated by the gov. you were military right???

I think it's funny that the GOP conservatives ( not you obviously ) are up in arms about this but think refusing service to Gays is acceptable. Cracks me up to no end their hypocrisy :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Gunshop owners can refuse to sell guns for a number of legal reasons, including nobody under 21. Look at the well established precedent here.

if they offer it to some and refuse others that meet the requirement by law :helpme:helpme the guy in my op went to purchase a rifle with a lawyer! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :Oh crap like i said in my other post!!!

Only in America would this be a debate.

That would be great. A cull of stupid people is needed in the States. Tell me how did it work out for the Branch Davidians? They couldn't withstand the FBI.

it's not one in your country... because you dont do combat. run your mouth cheerleader! your country would be someones bitch if my family and all the muther fuckers like rochard didn't serve.