GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you guys still consider 1024x768 when builidng a site? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1297234)

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 09:36 AM

Do you guys still consider 1024x768 when builidng a site?
 
I know only a small percentage are still using that resolution, but do you keep it in mind when building a site?

shake 03-27-2018 09:47 AM

I use the bootstrap framework and test on everything from phone size on up.

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 10:11 AM

Fuck no.

That's what responsive design is about; not giving a shit about resolution.

What kind of fucking question is this from a developer?

Give me my fucking money back if I ever bought anything from you.


:2 cents:

The Porn Nerd 03-27-2018 10:15 AM

If I had to choose a sngle resolution to design around it would be 1920x1080.

But if your design is responsive then it shouldn't matter, the site will re-format according to the device.

The only real issue should be the quality of your thumbs and preview videos on the Tour. :)

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 10:20 AM

I use bootstrap too, my question is more when you build a site for 1920, you have lots of room in the header lets say, if you fill it out, it will be messed up in 1024 then you will have to decide what to cut in that res... especially for text

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hdbuilder (Post 22244562)
I use bootstrap too, my question is more when you build a site for 1920, you have lots of room in the header lets say, if you fill it out, it will be messed up in 1024 then you will have to decide what to cut in that res... especially for text

DaFuCk?

See @media()

https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_mediaquery.asp


.

redwhiteandblue 03-27-2018 10:40 AM

*checks to see if this is a 15 year old thread been bumped*

Nope.

*scratches head*

SIK 03-27-2018 10:46 AM

I presume OP is asking if we build sites with SHITLOAD of header elements (texts, menus, graphics, whatever), which get fucked when resolution is smaller

am I right or am I right?

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 11:01 AM

You are absolutely right, and me i have users that can add text themselves in different places in the header so they can easily mess it up in 1024. And cutting text is not good SEO wise so i have to hide and tweak and its a pain

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIK (Post 22244577)
I presume OP is asking if we build sites with SHITLOAD of header elements (texts, menus, graphics, whatever), which get fucked when resolution is smaller

am I right or am I right?


Everybody except the OP already fixed those ancient problems.

:helpme


"You can lead a horse to water......"

https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_mediaquery.asp

Paul&John 03-27-2018 11:32 AM

Responsive all the way

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 22244590)
Everybody except the OP already fixed those ancient problems.

:helpme


"You can lead a horse to water......"

https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_mediaquery.asp

You just won a nice place on my ignored list right next to Paul

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hdbuilder (Post 22244617)
You just won a nice place on my ignored list right next to Paul

At least I won something for my efforts. :1orglaugh

Don't ignore this video though.

https://youtu.be/oCqha4qMvTo

2MuchMark 03-27-2018 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hdbuilder (Post 22244534)
I know only a small percentage are still using that resolution, but do you keep it in mind when building a site?

Hi HD,

The screensize of your viewers should be more or less irrelevant now. Every site should be "responsive" so that it resizes to look good on every screen size or device.

You also have to keep older viewers in mind, even when it comes to colors. These days, alot of sites have light grey text on near-white backgrounds because it looks kinda cool, but some older people have trouble seeing it. I have one client who is 80, and complains about this alot. And I listen, especially since he spends alot of money. :)

Forget building to a specific size if you can. Build for all sizes.

Good luck!

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 22244574)
*checks to see if this is a 15 year old thread been bumped*

Nope.

*scratches head*

Ummm, you better be careful. You might get on the ignore list.

:2 cents:

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 02:12 PM

I apologize to hdbuilder.

The way I made my post was not necessary.

I admit that I was a jerk in this thread.

:2 cents:

SIK 03-27-2018 03:43 PM

I don't know if you all are fucking with him or just not understanding his issue :1orglaugh

If you put too many elements (and text) in responsive design, it still looks like crap when screen size is reduced (like, full mobile screen of various shit on header only)

So to answer the OP's question... purge it all from header and move it elsewhere, as simple as that. Case closed.

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIK (Post 22244752)
I don't know if you all are fucking with him or just not understanding his issue :1orglaugh

If you put too many elements (and text) in responsive design, it still looks like crap when screen size is reduced (like, full mobile screen of various shit on header only)

So to answer the OP's question... purge it all from header and move it elsewhere, as simple as that. Case closed.

Don't worry, i don't care about the trolls that don't read shit and cant understand a thing. you on the other hand and a few up there understood what i meant. Thanks for your input.

hdbuilder 03-27-2018 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 22244696)
I apologize to hdbuilder.

The way I made my post was not necessary.

I admit that I was a jerk in this thread.

:2 cents:

Apologies accepted

blackmonsters 03-27-2018 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIK (Post 22244752)
I don't know if you all are fucking with him or just not understanding his issue :1orglaugh

If you put too many elements (and text) in responsive design, it still looks like crap when screen size is reduced (like, full mobile screen of various shit on header only)

So to answer the OP's question... purge it all from header and move it elsewhere, as simple as that. Case closed.

Yeah, but move it with responsive design; don't purge it.

:2 cents:

directfiesta 03-27-2018 04:11 PM

I build for 600 x 800 , mostly amber CRT monitors ....

SIK 03-27-2018 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 22244765)
Yeah, but move it with responsive design; don't purge it.

:2 cents:

Purge it from header I mean, no need to have shitloads of content in there.

Kittens 03-27-2018 05:17 PM

I don't have that issue because I use media queries and special classes that tell the elements to do certain things at certain sizes, such has hide themselves on smaller screens as to not cramp up the design.

redwhiteandblue 03-28-2018 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kittens (Post 22244799)
I don't have that issue because I use media queries and special classes that tell the elements to do certain things at certain sizes, such has hide themselves on smaller screens as to not cramp up the design.

Yes but be careful with hiding stuff as I got a penalty for hiding some text on mobile that is in the header on wider screen sizes. At least I am 99% sure I did, when I changed it back I got my traffic back. I guess it depends on how important Google thinks the text is.

incredibleworkethic 03-28-2018 12:33 PM

Responsive designs for the win.

rowan 03-28-2018 07:12 PM

My script phones home the browser res, I just checked over the past couple of months and nearly 10% of uniques are at 1024x768. So I wouldn't write them off just yet.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123