and the most violent group of people in the world are....
 

whites! :thumbsup

4500 years of war in one pic...

https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/ima...1035476482.jpg


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1JJHGxxSk3o/maxresdefault.jpg

I wonder why onehunglo and paul are not commenting :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

it may be because islam is really the religion of peace when you compare it to white folks :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That ain't news . . .

should we be importing these more peaceful people at all? what if the white man becomes less violent because of this? :mad::mad::mad:

anyway I am waiting on experts onehunglo and paul to chime in :2 cents:

Looks like the UK is coming out on top ?
I blame soccer violence :1orglaugh

"muslims have been killing each other for 1400 years" but europe seems to be glowing red-yellow hot with war zones :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

isnt it amazing how peaceful the white man is? paul and one hung lo agree :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

good, now you can stfu about American GFYers. you just proved yourself wrong with your misinterpretation of that map.

wtg brainiac. you just shot yourself in your foot 2x.

Well you can either explain what I misenterpreted or you can suck a bag of dicks...you just shot yourself in the foot 8325686432x.

oops, thought this was crime.

still an ignorant post though. continue

Thank you for the post. Interesting info

Failure to count hunter gatherer conflicts, and failure to count by bodies which would make China and Russia leaders by many orders of magnitude.

Crus, man, look, during Stalin you'd be eating a frozen shoe and then die in the snow. Same during Mao. Crack on the US all you want, but our "genocides" don't come near any of that. Yet.

I had no idea someone had been keeping a count for 4,500 years for every country in the world!

Wrong fake Nick bruh...

Yes that's why everybody is so terrified living in those countries inhabited by people of European origin. For example - it must have been real hell living in some smaller cities in Sweden in the 90's - they must have been pretty much 100 pct. European at the time.

Daily anti-white racist post quota met.

@crucifissio

do you have a gay r*pe heat map ? lol

you're obviously too dumb to realize that if you need a simple map like that explained to you, you're not going to grasp the explanation.

when you get confused you immediately start talking about sucking dicks- your safe space.

The map might as well be a population distribution map. It might be noted that in the backwards countries where people can barely write that they haven't really kept good track of their wars.

theres much more people in asia...but no white hot war lights...mostly red and we all know who started most of the newer conflicts...as for your "they can barely write" argument this is just silly talk...


I wonder why onehunglo and paul are silent? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh they always say islam has been killing each other for the last 1400 years but lo and behold...europeans!...

why is the white man so aggressive? maybe onhunglo can chime in :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Because that's what people did. Conquer lands and kill people. Yes we were good at it :thumbsup

Now, not so much. We live in a civilized world. So now we just drop bombs on people that don't act civilized. For example.. we dropped a bunch of those bombs on your dumb ass because you were raping women by the thousands. Rape = uncivilized so we drop bombs on you.

Kill Whitie!

too late :helpme:helpme he killed himself! :Oh crap

I mean compared to christians, islam really is the religion of peace...much much more peaceful than the white man :2 cents:

see them red dots on the map? most of that shit was started by the USA :thumbsup

PM me who you really are because no one is this anti-American. I won't tell.

Sure it is :1orglaugh

Since 9/11 muslims have carried out almost 33,000 attacks on innocent civilians.

33,000 TERROR ATTACKS

Yes a muslim did a thing.

i thought it's adult industry people, then i went to my first show. it wasn't too gangsta, instead i met tons of docile, noodle-armed people, just like myself :1orglaugh

OK here's a serious reply:

First you'd need to define violence, if you'd define violence as the amount of violence inside of any given society, North East Asian societies score the best, European societies right after them.

But if we take the graph - I figure this would be based on actual evidence, and would mean wars among sovereign nations, not genocide for example (example: Armenian genocide, genocide of Hindus, Jews, Christians, Africans under Islam, Pol Pot. juntas in Central / South America etc.)

For the past 4 500 years, there were only three societies that created civilizations with a high level of social cooperation and prosperity. Persian, Classical European and North East Asian. No other society in the past 4 500 years (with a possible exception of Inca / Aztec which was very cruel btw.) ever reached the point that a westerner understands as "civilized".

To find evidence of organized warfare elsewhere, where there was no civilization or written language in the first place, is certainly way more difficult (not to mention the historical population concentration - in the past prosperity meant more population, misery less - today it's exactly the opposite).

Most of the warfare documented in the past 4 500 years (which would be likely the case here) thus likely happened either among these three civilizations, or between them and others more primitive, but ruthless (Huns, Mongols, Islam) trying to subjugate them and take their wealth by force.

Hope this helps.

Btw. the original Arabs that were spreading Islam by sword from the Arabian peninsula were a semitic nation that was ethnically White (this is documented in the aHadith, also in many instances its explicitly noted that Mohammad was "white"). After they spread by the sword, more Islamic converts from the nations subjugated by Islam, that were non-white, were engaged in Jihad. Europe was hammered ruthlessly and also an estimated 1 million Europeans enslaved (for example even the famous writer Miguel Cervantes himself was enslaved for 5 years).

Here's a map of the Islamic expansion for illustration:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e5/27...48d340242f.jpg

If you look for a body count related to the Islamic Jihad and further genocide of the Dhimmi (Christians, Jews) and other polytheist population under Islamic rule throughout the 1 400 years of history of Islam, it's not easy to get the exact numbers. If you'd look for a total amount of casualties (not just direct warfare casualties) one also needs to take into consideration such accounts such as Arabs running the original slave trade (slavery was a powerful tool to spread Islam and is still alive in some parts of the Islamic world).

The center for the study of political Islam came up with the following estimation (citation follows):

---

Africa
Thomas Sowell [Thomas Sowell, Race and Culture, BasicBooks, 1994, p. 188] estimates that 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. For every slave captured many others died. Estimates of this collateral damage vary. The renowned missionary David Livingstone estimated that for every slave who reached a plantation, five others were killed in the initial raid or died of illness and privation on the forced march.[Woman’s Presbyterian Board of Missions, David Livingstone, p. 62, 1888] Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old. These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.

120 million Africans

Christians
The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:

60 million Christians

Hindus
Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism in India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”

80 million Hindus

Buddhists
Buddhists do not keep up with the history of war. Keep in mind that in jihad only Christians and Jews were allowed to survive as dhimmis (servants to Islam) everyone else had to convert or die. Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India. The total is roughly 10 million. [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-1.]

10 million Buddhists

Jews
Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions. After that, the Jews submitted and became the dhimmis (servants and second class citizens) of Islam and did not have geographic political power.

This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad.

----

This is quite a staggering number given that most of this happened between 622 AD and 1924 AD (the end of the last Caliphate) thus with practically no weapons of mass destruction available.

The only Islamic genocide of non Islamic population that could be regarded as committed with advanced weapons was the Armenian genocide that was supposed to bring about 1.5 million casualties from 1914 - 1923.

270 mil? those are rookie numbers...lets just look at the brits:

10 million - UK ships carrying slaves 245 years
100million - north american indians
100million - india (most were starved to death)
40million - british opium trade enforced by the military in china
==========
250million and I mentioned only the americas and india...I did not even mention africa and the 100-s of other british colonies :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I would be willing to bet that the results look the same :2 cents:

dude thats just britan...what about the other colonialists? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


anyway, islam = religion of peace....simply because the white man is much much much more violent...



and in the same time period the USA has done 425.000 terror attacks :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

USA is 5% of the worlds population and islam is 20%...so if we look at just terror attacks islam is 40x more peaceful than the white man :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What have you done lately? I understand the message but it is lost when using such a huge timeline.

what do you mean "what have I done lately?"....

I was just reminding paul and onehunglo how peaceful everybody else is compared to europeans...for example radical islam is 40x more peaceful than US foreign policy :2 cents:

OneHungLo stole it so he and onwebcam can plan their next gaycation!

OK now let's take a look at just one example - these "100 mil." figure for North American Indians - this is the highest possible estimate that ever appeared for a total historical population of Northern American Indians. There's very limited evidence that there even EVER existed 100 mil. Indians all together.

For comparison - the whole continent of Africa which is huge, fertile land known for its chaotic mating habits had a total population of 100 mil. at the start of the 20th century. One hundred years after the British Empire, as the first in the world, abolished the slave trade.

The more conservative estimation for American Indians is 3 - 18 million, where different tribes were fighting among each other ruthlessly before any settlers ever appeared on the scene. While most of which later perished to disease (small pox and other European diseases) as opposed to actual warfare. This is just to illustrate an example where facts and history again get in the way of the heavily popular anti-White sentiment.

But let's not even argue the casualties of former colonialism, there's something more fascinating here.

If the legacy of former colonialism equals ethnic propensity to "violence" using today's entirely insane mainstream anti-White SJW logic - then I equally can't think of a more cruel treatment than to force or even allow all these non-whites to share a territory with those wicked people of European origin.

Don't get confused, as mentioned above, one can hate on White people in the case of Islam too, since the original founders of Islam were ethnically white (Mohammad even owned black slaves). These were some of the most brutal warlords and slave traders in the history. The shock and awe tactics employed by the Caliphs in the offensive Jihad and overseeing their territories is comparable, if not triumphant to those of Mongols or other famed savage forces.

And of course It's a given that 1 400 years of history true to a certain universal, final and "perfect", never modified doctrine, calling Muslims the "best of people" and non Muslims "the worst of creatures", dividing the world among dar-al-Islam ("land of Islam") and dar-al-Harb ("land of war"). Calling for violent and non violent Jihad and subjugation of the whole world proves it is an entirely peaceful ideology. After all, "salam" aka "peace", according to the doctrine of Islam, is defined as possible only once the rule of Islam is universal worldwide.

Not only that, it is a peaceful ideology since, remind me what the logic is, it does not come from Whites?? (false, its founders were white and the original Arabs always held in a higher ethnical regard).

@carlostheguacho

I am sure that the white man examined himself and found that not only is the 100million indians figure too large but the total murdered was just 2 dudes...this is history according to the white man in a nutshell :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

also I am just trolling onehunglo and paul...my own beliefs are that we are all the same...the ones with the most power abused it the most, but this had little to do with the normal population in europe, nobody asked them for their opinion...a few dudes at the top decided to exploit the living shit out of who ever they could...the whole thread is bullshit trolling :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Folks don't be stupid and claim there were even 10million native americans in the area of the US. 100m is outright insane. There may have been 20 million in the entire S and N american continents.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup great post

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

isnt it funny how africa,china,india all had easily 100mil+ populations each...but the americas had 10mil :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


I like the white mans account of history...in like 100 years they will claim it was just a few dudes who died of natural causes and the invading europeans just tried to help :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

exclaims the anti-American who can't even read a map.

all these arguments remind me of that anti jew guy who claimed the gas chambers were not for jews but for killing lice :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I trust the white mans history 2000% :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

white guys made that map!


ahahahahahah.

god you are stupid! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

OK, fill us all in then, who made the map? prove me wrong or stfu.

bomba mo, you can either explain why I misenterpreted the map or you can keep chocking on cock... its all the same to me :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I can't help it if brassmonkey fails to grasp what is going on in this thread. that has nothing to do with your equating everything to dick sucking.

With you a Muslim spitting gum on the sidewalk is "a terrorist act!" With you a Muslim not flushing the toilet is "a terrorist act!" You see a Muslim turd in the toilet and you think it's a dirty bomb! I don't trust your numbers boy

Silly person, the S and N American continents were, at that time, all populated by hunter gatherers, which have a much lower density, while the continents you mention were populated by agriculturists, which have a _________ (you answer here) density.

Here is a good site for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_...tion_estimates

Please read therein that in 1500 AD N America 2 million and S America 18 million

And, BTW, you are white, not just white but eeeeeextra white. You are white rice on a white plate on a white table cloth on a white table. You are the absence of color. You shouldn't go skiing, they'd lose you.

So enough of this white man bullshit.

how would we even fucking know who made the first map? it has nothing to do with the killing. anyhoo don't take your gun to din din bro hammer :Oh crap :thumbsup:thumbsup

I am not going to bother discussing your other numbers until you explain how you came up with that number.

radical islam...40x more peaceful than US foreign policy :2 cents: :thumbsup