![]() |
After The Singapore Nuclear Summit, U.S. And North Korea Appear As Far Apart As Ever
The most fundamental difference appears to relate to the basic premise of the deal: Does North Korea give up nuclear weapons first, in exchange for a better relationship? Or is this a process that will play out step by step?
The Trump administration had previously ruled out a step-by-step approach. In May, Pompeo told reporters, "We are not going to do this in small increments, where the world is essentially coerced into relieving economic pressure." President Trump seemed to agree, saying Tuesday that Kim would begin "de-nuking" North Korea "very quickly." The problem is that the North Korean account said the opposite — that Trump had agreed to a "step-by-step" process in which the United States would "offer security guarantees to the DPRK and lift sanctions against it..." https://www.npr.org/2018/06/14/61988...-apart-as-ever |
Trump has no idea what he is doing. Sitting down and having the meeting was the easy part.
We've been here a dozen times before. I mean, we've signed a dozen agreements with North Korea before. Not one of them worked. |
nuke up or get USIS-ed...there can be no peace when a certain country has privatized war and made it for profit...what happens when there is no more war? the war machine just stops? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
nukes = peace or nuclear winter no nukes = you get fucked option #1 pls :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents: |
but but but trump canceled the summit in a stunning and brilliant checkmate move to get Un to agree to denuke at the summit.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not to mention that we've signed a dozen such agreements with North Korea in the past. |
Quote:
pompeo even went so far as to discount what was written down in the agreement. "When directly asked about the obvious difference between the U.S. and North Korean readouts on phasing — "Was the North['s] account of the meeting accurate when they said that President Trump had agreed to a phased approach?" — Pompeo responded with a statement that should be a huge red flag: "I'm going to leave the content of our discussions as between the two parties, but one should heavily discount some things that are written in other places." The problem is that one cannot "heavily discount" how one of the two parties interprets an agreement. " https://www.state.gov/secretary/rema.../06/283183.htm |
Quote:
that's what I'm saying. trump's 9 dimensional chess negotiating brilliance = zilch. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the fact remains, there is no deal. in words or actions. |
It was nothing more than a photo op to impress his cultists and a chance to rub elbows with another dictator. Anyone who thinks it was anything more is delusional.
|
Quote:
The media are mostly spin machines and have little to do with truth. Watch C-span for a few months to a year, listen and see what is actually said by people in government and then compare that with what is reported by all media outlets as to what was being said or done. You will realize then that sometimes the media reporting bears little resemblance to what was actually said or done. The media basically does not have anymore knowledge about any event than you do, especially since investigating reporting is all but dead. You do not in "fact" know if there is no deal by "words or action" at this point in time. As you only have at your disposal media accounts or public words from politicians some of which may in fact know anymore about the subject than you do. I will repeat in a few months time we "may" know by actions taken by both sides a little more. We will not know by the public words spoken by each side and certainly not by words from the press. |
Quote:
The fellow who wrote the article I cited is a NK policy wonk, not a journalist. It all certainly corresponds with reality as well. if trump achieved CVID or anything close to that he would point to it. Instead we get rhetoric. the only reason for trump or the US government to not share any specifics is because there are not any specifics, because there is no deal. Un won't denuke, and now, after trump, he doesn't need to. trump stated we can all sleep better, he solved the nuke problem. no. |
re: your edit-
I know for a fact we don't have a deal. I don't need to wait for a smoking gun to know there is no deal. |
Quote:
|
Steve, I have a much higher education than you.
|
Quote:
|
I knew you weren't good with facts.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc