Should Tattoos be the basis for DEPORTATION?
 

Tattoos Shouldn?t Be Cause for Deportation - Reason.com

Seems like a straight open and shut case... until you think about the implications...

They're degenerate, so yes.

Women in porn are heavily tattooed to push an image of anti-fertility. That's not healthy, and no self-respecting nation should tolerate it.

in 100 years there will be almost no white people :thumbsup

unless we do something about it :winkwink:

white people will die out anyway...if you are not having enough kids then there is no solution...

^ we will create a fertility culture. It will be sexier than everything that porn represents.

https://kek.gg/i/7jKnSY.jpg

People CAN and do change, you know....

It's case to case basis

That's naive . . .

he's giving the cops wife the evil eye im sure.... :disgust

sure they can! they let a guy out of prison in cali a hardcore mexican gangster. he ended up killing a cop. that was like a couple months ago i think. he has tats on his face.
A gang member killed a cop nine days after he got out of jail. Did California's justice reforms play a role?
https://i.imgur.com/QicLJFJ.jpg

That would be more than 80% of the population..lol
Good thing I don't have a single tattoo..

Should Tattoos be the basis for DEPORTATION?


Depends. If they are illegals or dreamers with gang tattoos they should be.

There'd be very few people left in this country were that implemented here.

^ That's their fault.

sucks for you :2 cents:

[...Since 2000 there has been an increasing sense by the white Zimbabwean community that the rule of law has been selectively applied to crimes committed on members of Zimbabwe's white community.[140]
White emigration – particularly from within the farming community – picked up speed again after 2000. There is a link between the recent economic decline in Zimbabwe and white emigration.


blah blah blah etc ...

Yes...

https://tattoodo-web.imgix.net/image...ormat,compress