Would having a Gay King of England change anything?
 

I was checking out my daily newsfeed and ran into this comment on a post about official pictures of Prince Louis' christening

Apparently, people in the Anglican Church are PRAYING that this comes to pass

Historically, the commenter may be wrong since there are already a few gay English kings - they just weren't as public about it (at least according to contemporary standards)

The problem is so many straight men think that Gay means an afeminant faggot. Most Gay guys are like you and me, but just happen to be born attracted to other guys.

Nowadays we know the afeminant Gay stereotype we were fed is the far left of the Gay spectrum closer to transexuals than your typical Gay guy.

Side note... would a Gay king be called Queen?

I wish Trump was gay. So then I could support everything he does, including Making America Gay Again. And whoever refuses to support Trump and the wall would be a homophobic intolerant conservative.

But would people end up calling him The Queen anyways? Food for thought.

True. The person in charge of printing out British pounds would have a tough time

If they had a gay king would gay people get all kinds of tax cuts and stuff?? Dosent sound fair..

if gay king married gay queen, would that bring an end to british monarchy?

The royals have already been 'enriched' (Harry was introduced to Meghan by a Jewish matchmaker), so no, probably not.

I'm sure there were historical monarchs who were gay, but they were discreet about it because they weren't trying to change the culture. They probably respected England for what it was, instead of trying to change it into what they wanted it to be.

George IV fucked anything that moved.

>> Would having a Gay King of England change anything? Would having a Gay King of England change anything?

more brits would get screwed probably

Only if they acted like Liberace or onwebcam. Rock Hudson was gay and didn't act like a queen

Source link?