GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News One juror held up Manafort trial and stopped guilty conviction on all 18 counts (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1302743)

crockett 08-23-2018 07:01 AM

One juror held up Manafort trial and stopped guilty conviction on all 18 counts
 
The 1st juror has spoken out and stated that all jurors except one wanted guilty verdicts on all 18 counts in the Manafort trial.

The juror has said the evidence was overwhelming that he was guilty but for some unknown reason one juror wouldn't accept the evidence no matter how many times it was laid out in front of them..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ma...on-all-counts/

Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
The 1st juror has spoken out and stated that all jurors except one wanted guilty verdicts on all 18 counts in the Manafort trial.

The juror has said the evidence was overwhelming that he was guilty but for some unknown reason one juror wouldn't accept the evidence no matter how many times it was laid out in front of them..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ma...on-all-counts/

Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

You missed the parts where that juror is a Trump supporter and she states it was a "witch hunt" and he wouldn't have even been charged if he wouldn't have been on Trump's campaign.

2MuchMark 08-23-2018 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

https://thetrumpimpeachment.com/wp-c...93639707-2.jpg

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:08 AM

One juror almost got removed and mistrial declared because another juror claimed she said she had already decided him guilty before the prosecution had finished.. The judge decided not to do anything about it because he didn't know which person to believe. Meaning 1 of the 2 were being deceptive but he didn't know which..

crockett 08-23-2018 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325266)
You missed the parts where that juror is a Trump supporter and she states it was a "witch hunt" and he wouldn't have even been charged if he wouldn't have been on Trump's campaign.

"The evidence was overwhelming. I did not want Paul Manafort to be guilty but he was and no one is above the law," Duncan said.


The juror speaking out said she supported Trump but said the evidence was overwhelming and the Manafort was guilty...

Even she voted guilty on all 18 counts..

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325270)
"The evidence was overwhelming. I did not want Paul Manafort to be guilty but he was and no one is above the law," Duncan said.


The juror speaking out said she supported Trump but said the evidence was overwhelming and the Manafort was guilty...

Even she voted guilty on all 18 counts..

"it should have been an audit instead"

It was a witch hunt.. They knew it was.. They found him guilty because he was obviously guilty but the charges would have never occurred had he not been on Trump's campaign... That's what she said.....

She also said she felt like she was the only Trump supporter... So very likely your "missing link" was Democrat..

They majority ruled the vote on the counts. I was going to post about that.. Tuesday the judge decided he wasn't going to hold them to unanimous consent..

crockett 08-23-2018 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325271)
"it should have been an audit instead"

It was a witch hunt.. They knew it was.. They found him guilty because he was obviously guilty but the charges would have never occurred had he not been on Trump's campaign... That's what she said.....

You have that wrong.. Manafort would have never gotten caught for his crimes if Trump hadn't fired Comey.

Comey wasn't investigating Trump he was following the leads in the Russian hacking.

Once Trump fired Comey the investigation then took 2 directions.

#1 was the Russian investigation which now intertwined with the Trump campaign because investigators had to look at why would Trump say publicly that he fired Comey to ease pressure off him. This made the investigation cue in on the Trump campaign.

#2 the 2nd half of the investigation 100% targets Trump for obstruction of justice. This part of the investigation would have never existed if Trump hadn't fired Comey..


It's not a witch hunt.. it was brought on by Trumps actions and Trumps own words..


Why is it you right wing nuts always blame everyone else and never own up for your own mistakes or actions? You guys are the OG of the dindo nuffins...

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325275)
Comey wasn't investigating Trump he was following the leads in the Russian hacking.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

BaldBastard 08-23-2018 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325271)
"it should have been an audit instead"

It was a witch hunt.. They knew it was.. They found him guilty because he was obviously guilty but the charges would have never occurred had he not been on Trump's campaign... That's what she said.....

You rip any Government off, in any country, for taxes over 10 million dollars and its going to be slightly more than an audit. ;)

crockett 08-23-2018 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325277)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The simple fact is Trump probably would have gotten away with it if he hadn't fired Comey.. Manafort, the Coffee boy, Cohen nor the others would have never been charged if not for Trump firing Comey..


Heck you even started multiple topics here on GFY proclaiming Trump was innocent because Comey said he wasnt a target in the investigation..

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 22325278)
You rip any Government off, in any country, for taxes over 10 million dollars and its going to be slightly more than an audit. ;)

Where did you get that figure from? Because the back taxes was calculated at $1.5 mil..

Not even mentioning the fact it was his partner who admitted stealing from him that did the taxes..


The IRS didn't bring the case.. The banks didn't bring the case.. The "witch hunt" did.

crockett 08-23-2018 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325282)
Where did you get that figure from? Because the back taxes was calculated at $1.5 mil..

Not even mentioning the fact it was his partner who admitted stealing fro him that did the taxes..


The IRS didn't bring the case.. The banks didn't bring the case.. The "witch hunt" did.

You just can't take it that Trump created this entire problem for himself. Comey state Trump was not a target.. Trump repeatedly stated this so no one could forget..

Then he fired Comey and after that Republicans voted to allow a Special Counsel headed by Mueller to investigate the Russian interference and to investigate Trump for obstruction of justice.

All because Trump fired Comey..

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325285)
You just can't take it that Trump created this entire problem for himself. Comey state Trump was not a target.. Trump repeatedly stated this so no one could forget..

Then he fired Comey and after that Republicans voted to allow a Special Counsel headed by Mueller to investigate the Russian interference and to investigate Trump for obstruction of justice.

All because Trump fired Comey..

You're conveniently leaving out a few facts.. The person overseeing Mueller for one is the person who suggested Comey be fired.... Rosenstein.. It was all a setup.....

Guess who was running the tax division when it was discovered Hillary's foundation wasn't declaring donations to her foundation? Rosenstein... Guess who was running the investigation? Comey...

celandina 08-23-2018 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
The 1st juror has spoken out and stated that all jurors except one wanted guilty verdicts on all 18 counts in the Manafort trial.

The juror has said the evidence was overwhelming that he was guilty but for some unknown reason one juror wouldn't accept the evidence no matter how many times it was laid out in front of them..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ma...on-all-counts/

Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

80 years or 300. 70 year old does not give a fuck. It is a life sentence...Come on guys get a life !!

crockett 08-23-2018 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325286)
You're conveniently leaving out a few facts.. The person overseeing Mueller for one is the person who suggested Comey be fired.... Rosenstein.. It was all a setup.....

Guess who was running the tax division when it was discovered Hillary's foundation wasn't declaring donations to her foundation? Rosenstein... Guess who was running the investigation? Comey...


So if the guy you think wanted Comey fired is now overseeing the investigation then Trump shouldn't have anything to worry about..

That is unless Rosenstein didnt want Comey fired and was extremely pissed off that Trump used his memo as reason to fire Comey... yea then Trump might have to he worried.

Humm once again comes back to Trumps actions...

beerptrol 08-23-2018 07:45 AM

Fun watching Chump and his cultist explain and defend the criminal activities of Chump and his people.
They are good people, so what if they committed a crime. They shouldn't have been charged and let go to continue!

So some people should be above the law(Chump and his supporters)

onwebcam 08-23-2018 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325289)
So if the guy you think wanted Comey fired is now overseeing the investigation then Trump shouldn't have anything to worry about..

That is unless Rosenstein didnt want Comey fired and was extremely pissed off that Trump used his memo as reason to fire Comey... yea then Trump might have to he worried.

Humm once again comes back to Trumps actions...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What kind of idiot thinking is that? Rosenstein was Comey's BOSS... If he suggests to the President he should be fired then he's going to do it..... Especially after he KNEW Comey was hiding the investigation from him..... That's what you don't get... Trump knew about EVERYTHING via NSA Mike Rogers before he even stepped foot in the door. Trump gave Comey a number of opportunities to come clean and he didn't... Rosenstein made the suggestion to fire so Trump leaped...


Rosenstein is a fucking SNAKE in the grass. And he will be eventually proven as such..

astronaut x 08-23-2018 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325266)
You missed the parts where that juror is a Trump supporter and she states it was a "witch hunt" and he wouldn't have even been charged if he wouldn't have been on Trump's campaign.

That actually makes complete sense. All the evidence is there and they still have their heads in their ass.

directfiesta 08-23-2018 08:36 AM

How come that juror was not challenged during the selection process ....

Juror are supposed to be impartial .... Obviously was not.

As for one juror making her mind up half way in the trial, there is nothing surprising with all the evidence put forward ...

PS: CRA ( Canadian Revenue Agency ) is doing a witch hunt against me .... they sent me a bill !!!! for refused expenses .... WITCHUNT !!!!!!!

onwebcam 08-23-2018 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22325307)
Juror are supposed to be impartial .... Obviously was not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22325307)
As for one juror making her mind up half way in the trial, there is nothing surprising with all the evidence put forward ...


Liberal logic on full display

astronaut x 08-23-2018 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

When normally it's someone saying NO and then getting paid.

http://ih1.redbubble.net/image.13563...375x360.u1.png

bronco67 08-23-2018 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
wouldn't accept the evidence no matter how many times it was laid out in front of them..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ma...on-all-counts/

Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

She didn't get paid. If you listen to her Fox News interview you can see she's a Trumptard who goes through all the usual "witch hunt" talking points.

Bladewire 08-23-2018 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325264)
The 1st juror has spoken out and stated that all jurors except one wanted guilty verdicts on all 18 counts in the Manafort trial.

The juror has said the evidence was overwhelming that he was guilty but for some unknown reason one juror wouldn't accept the evidence no matter how many times it was laid out in front of them..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paul-ma...on-all-counts/

Sounds a lot like someone got paid to vote no..

The good news is the judge can take into account Manorts guilt on the other counts with a standard less than readonable doubt and he can add to his time during sentencing based on that probability. I forget what the term is, but it's good news :thumbsup

Bladewire 08-23-2018 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22325327)
She didn't get paid. If you listen to her Fox News interview you can see she's a Trumptard who goes through all the usual "witch hunt" talking points.

These creatures really drag down the human race.

Rochard 08-23-2018 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325275)
Manafort would have never gotten caught for his crimes if Trump hadn't fired Comey.

Maybe? Most likely eventually he would have been caught.

I honestly don't care. The Republicans sent the precedent with the White Water investigation. A simple investigation into a investment the President had ended up exposing a blow job with an intern, and impeached President Clinton of lying under oath. If an investigation turns up crimes, then they can investigate those crimes and press charges.

This is very similar to Watergate. Most of us look at Watergate and think the end result was that Nixon was impeached and then resigned. Most of us don't know that over sixty people were indicted, and a lot of people went to prison.

crockett 08-23-2018 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22325292)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What kind of idiot thinking is that? Rosenstein was Comey's BOSS... If he suggests to the President he should be fired then he's going to do it..... Especially after he KNEW Comey was hiding the investigation from him..... That's what you don't get... Trump knew about EVERYTHING via NSA Mike Rogers before he even stepped foot in the door. Trump gave Comey a number of opportunities to come clean and he didn't... Rosenstein made the suggestion to fire so Trump leaped...


Rosenstein is a fucking SNAKE in the grass. And he will be eventually proven as such..

Sure, sure just like they are gonna lock her up any day now along with all those predictions you made about "today is the day it all goes down"...

Rosenstein never wanted Comey fired. He was told to write a memo about potential issues with Comey. He did, then it was used as a excuse to fire Comey. This royally pissed Rosenstein off.

Again Trump's problems all revolve around his own actions.

Phoenix 08-23-2018 09:39 AM

So cliff notes...manafort is not being convicted on anything?

crockett 08-23-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22325327)
She didn't get paid. If you listen to her Fox News interview you can see she's a Trumptard who goes through all the usual "witch hunt" talking points.


That's not the juror who voted no on the 10 counts. The trump tard juror voted guilty on all counts.. The juror who voted no on 10 counts hasn't publicly spoken.

crockett 08-23-2018 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22325347)
So cliff notes...manafort is not being convicted on anything?

Yes he was found guilty on 8 charges, but 10 charges were declared a mistrial because of 1 juror. He still gets sentenced on the 8 guilty charges, just not on the full 18.

He can still be retried on the remaining 10 charges.

Phoenix 08-23-2018 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22325350)
Yes he was found guilty on 8 charges, but 10 charges were declared a mistrial because of 1 juror. He still gets sentenced on the 8 guilty charges, just not on the full 18.

He can still be retried on the remaining 10 charges.

Did they list what charges were sticking and punishments?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123