any science geeks here
 

2 questions about gravity, 1. does gravity exist with out time, in null time? 2. are inertia and other forms of 'energy' related to gravity, like with out the forces of gravity in action these other energies would not exist? thanks and to the haters...why bother bro? get a life....

1. Gravity could care less what time it is.

2. There is no gravity, the earth sucks

Never ask a question you don't know the answer to.

Gravity is invisible.

Therefore

What is the planet "doing" that is invisible?

The answer causes gravity.

no brains apparent here lol!

You'll just disagree with people and insult them so the don't reply anymore. You pretty much deeply insulted every single person that replied to your "God" thread.

I like this explanation better; 2 men 300 mile apart head due north. when they reach the pole they are at the same spot. unaware of curvature of the earth, they decide to call this mystery 'gravity'

what the fuck are you on about? can you answer the question of not? did you bother to read this part: and to the haters...why bother bro? get a life.... n


nobody would talk to me about god, lyou guys are all about fuck faking Jesus.


kinda like you guys blaming everything since the big bang on fake fucking jesus then you assholes demand that I prove fake fucking jesus is real or Im a piece shit, talk about FUCKING insulting ...2 cents:

what the fuck insulted you asshole? like I shouldn't be fucking insulted that you drop cucks, cocks and homo bullshit in it almost every post of mine.. WTF is wrong with you. and who in the fuck has the right to be insulted here asshole, hint for the clueless, it aint you

Hey I get you. You don't insult me because I get you and where you're coming from. Other people not so much.

I'm just talking about how others were offended by your responses. Go read your "God" thread and how a few people brought up that you were insulting everyone that responded.

Don't shoot the messenger dude jeez!

You just need to keep posting these threads and posting responses so they can get to know you better & warm up to you just like I did :thumbsup

WITHOUT time or with time standing still?

As we live in a 4 dimensional space-time, and with gravity just being a deformation of that space-time along the "time" dimension I'd guess that there's no gravity when time is missing.

On the other hand, when time=0 gravity should be infinite, or better said "not defined", like a division by 0 (I'm just guessing here :))

All things are relative.
All relatives are things.
My relatives took all my things.

I'm more into the greek science of leisure. . .

why are you asking us, we're just webmasters, remember? you claimed you're the deep thinker, not us.

1. Nothing does exist w/o time like time does not exist w/o space, e.g. our University. Before the the Big Bang there was no University, no gravity and... no time. You maybe surprised but there is no such a thing like "5 minutes before Big Bang", because you can't count something which does not exist. Gravitation exists with the time and IN time of course.

2. They the kinetic energy exists w/o any gravitation. It exists till the object which has a mass is moving. So in a space w/o atmosphere and gravitation it will exist forever.

And why it's a question for "science geeks"? It's something that every 5th grader knows :)

Quote: There are more stars in the universe than there are on earth.

You're brain is sexy AF! Damn you're smart

play the country song backwards and get your stuff back!

wrong.

the fact is the general relativity simply can't calculate time prior to the Big Bang. you don't know for a fact that time did not exist prior to the BB.

I never went back to the thread, I have no choices about god unfortunately , the people that I chat with don't seem to be offended. the guys shouting fuck fuck fuck you don't really concern myself with bro.. I will be more cautions in the future. thanks...

math is difficult for me however I do think as you that time and gravity are intertwined , not one with out the other. I'm asking because have found a spiritual correlation .. strictly a thought experiment but isn't that how it all starts :winkwink:

I keep hoping deep inside that you will stop being passive aggressive and use your intellect to chat with me on the weird stuff honestly.. it's hard to find sharp dudes.. even fucking broco guy could have posted the response you did :2 cents:

Wherever there is matter there is gravity & time because matter is made of atoms.

Atoms create their own gravitational pull due to the electrons spinning around the nucleus (protons & neutrons). Atoms make up matter.

The more matter you have grouped together ( ie a star ) the more gravitational pull it has on other object (ie a planet)

To truly understand time, gravity & inertia you need to look at the subatomic level and dark matter. Ready to have your mind blown?

I am current with big bang theory, thank you. so your thoughts that gravity is part of the 'fabric' of reality not a component.

what if kinetic energy were 'stored gravity because the object would have no mass to store energy and mass is a by product of gravity hence kinetic energy is a form of gravity,... yes ? no?

i'm just a webmaster.

your theory dropped dead right here... atoms are so like 1940 :2 cents: and exactly all matter is related to gravity and all energy is related to gravity. correct? none exist with out the other….

I need a good webmaster, I need a site for main stream photography, portfolio and client access.

I said that to further understand time, gravity & inertia you need to go-to the subatomic level & dark matter. Quatum Mechanics to symplify it for you. You know, electrons being at two different places at the same time.

I'm not your guy.

dark matter and dark energy are simple and easy to explain homey... as dark mater collapse the universe dark energy expands the universe… the universe is compressing and expanding, in flux...since the universe is 75% hydrogen, the propose of existence is to compress and expand hydrogen.. feel better now :thumbsup

I know that, your creepy :2 cents:

I'm just a webmaster.

Stop trying to sound intelligent. It's not working.

you missed read the post as well :2 cents:

nothing exist without time.

No. Time did not exist before Big Bang because... there was no such a thing s "before". Educate yourself: What Existed Before The Big Bang?. Just a quote:

Stephen Hawking argues time did not begin with the Big Bang. It was just going in a different direction. But how does it possible? So it's just a theory.

In which hole did you get your education, man?

The kinetic energy needs only speed and mass. There is no gravity component in the formula. In case if you didn't learn it in the school: Kinetic energy - Wikipedia

There is such a thing as a gravitation potential energy which is a different thing: Gravitational energy - Wikipedia - it's not about a moving object. It's about an object which you hold in your hand staying at a roof and being to release. When the object will be dropped, the gravitation will turn its potential energy into a kinetic one. So longer path to the ground your object made, so higher kinetic energy it will have.

As another example, a bullet in your gun has a potential energy too and it does not need any gravitation to be turned ink the kinetic one. Just pull the trigger...

Man, these are basics of physics.

you're ignorant in both math and science, probably due to your poor schooling, alcoholism, and failing health. that's why you rely on sites like Quora to tell you things you don't understand.

again, general relativity can't explain anything prior to the BB. you interpret that to mean there was no time prior to the BB.

here, I'll give you a chance to embarrass yourself.............

prove there was no time prior to the BB.

Who told you anything about general relativity theory, junkie? There is a Big Bang theory for that and I gave you a link above.

Stephen Hawking for a junkie: https://www.livescience.com/61914-st...g-of-time.html

In a lecture on the no-boundary proposal, Hawking wrote: "Events before the Big Bang are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them. Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that time began at the Big Bang."

I trust to this guy more than to some uneducated trailer park junkie.

PERIOD.

you just proved my point at the same time showing your ignorance, dumbfuck. again, general relativity doesn't go beyond the BB. If you knew what the fuck you were quoting, you'd know that's what Hawking is referring to, but you're a fuckup drunk ruski.

I will not argue with some american trailer trash junkie, whose head was hurt by hurricanes and meth. So I'm out. The links are posted above, so everybody can open and read them.

I'm still laughing my fucking ass off at the absurdity of this post.

holy crap that's some dumbfuck shit right there.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

<--laughing at you drunk ruski.

you're the dumbfuck that doesn't even realize the BB theories emerge from the math of general relativity.

JTFC you're a drunk fuckup ruski.

get the fuck out.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

ruski fails to comprehend basic facts.

Hawking is stating that GR stops at the singularity.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

drunk fuckup ruski is too stupid to figure that out.

you are throwing gibberish, you haven't answered he question

so the basics of physics is framed in gravity, now you tell me why kinetic energy has no relation to gravity

ahahaha, dumbfuck ruski.

This New Study Suggests Time Did Actually Exist Before The Big Bang.

Physics Letters B
Volume 778, 10 March 2018, Pages 339-343

Through the big bang: Continuing Einstein's equations beyond a cosmological singularity


"The generic nature of singularities beyond which physics cannot be deterministically continued is a cornerstone of General Relativity (GR).

This is a non-trivial prediction of the relational description; the big bang/crunch is not the end of physics – it is instead a regular point of the relational evolution. Describing our solutions as spacetimes that satisfy Einstein's equations, we find that the relational dynamical system predicts two singular solutions of GR that are connected at the hypersurface of the singularity such that relational DOFs are continuous and the orientation of the spatial frame is inverted.

The Hawking–Penrose theorems [1] show that a large class of solutions of Einstein's equations are geodesically incomplete. In cosmological settings this leads to the big bang (or crunch) – the inevitable end of classical evolution of the Lorentzian spacetime geometry. To establish this result, it is important to disentangle singularities of spacetime geometry from singular evolution."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...70269318300637

only a drunk piece of shit dimwitted ruski would think GR doesn't apply to the BB.

ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha