There might be a nude selfie in the Mueller investigation evidence
 

Please God let it not be CHUMP!!!!!:Oh crap:Oh crap


A Russian company told a federal court Thursday that it believes that among the terabytes of data collected by special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is a nude selfie.

Concord Management and Catering -- without providing information on who is depicted in the nude selfie -- questions whether there could be national security concerns related to such a holding.



http://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.mb...B5QvsdDjxwHaFP

It's not a Trump, more likely a hairy Russian bear from Concord's management team.

the Ivanka fake deserved a bump !

Melina I don't like, has that hard eastern euro look, but Ivanka I could do all day.

For me it's that plastic face. The more plastic surgery a woman gets, the deeper into the uncanny valley they seem to fall into, and the creepier they become to me.

I would say you read it wrong but I'm sure you didn't read it.. They are concerned how a nude selfie could be considered a national security concern.. As in the picture is of one of the nobody perps. Also as in Mueller's investigation is a joke.

It's Anthony Wiener.

I sent him one - I'm surprised he kept it

You would be wrong but that's par for the course with you. The only joke around here is you!

I'm 100% right and you're twisting it to your liking as usual. I'll be more than happy to post the quotes since you neglected to (likely for a reason even if subconsciously)

The entire filing reads like "WTF is this bullshit?" Literally calling Mueller out for making up laws on the fly.


The filing
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...pposition.html

The related portion

"A first year law student would likely question how Napue helps the Special Counsel here,
where the Special Counsel wants to secretly traduce Concord and co-defendants to the Court so
the Court will deny all allegedly sensitive discovery to Concord. The Court has not asked for an
ex parte submission, as was the case in Napue. And the ex parte submission in Napue was
determined on appeal to be both improper and insufficient, saved only because the witness
names were ultimately provided to the defendant. The Special Counsel here is not seeking delay
in production, but instead asking to Court to prohibit Concord forever from seeing the obligatory
discovery. Putting aside for the moment the question of how this would work at an actual trial (it
will not), the Special Counsel bizarrely notes that “should discovery in this case continue . . .” he
now intends to invoke the Classified Information Procedures Act (“CIPA”) despite the fact that
none of the discovery is classified. See Motion at 4 n.2. But the Special Counsel has not
completed discovery even to defense counsel, so what the heck is he now talking about?"

Next it looks as if the Special Counsel tossed in United States v. Yunis, 867 F.2d 617
(D.C. Cir. 1989), just to have a case from this Circuit. It is reasonable to ask if he just threw a
dart at the Federal Reporter. In Yunis, the prosecutor made ex parte submissions specifically
pursuant to the procedures set forth under CIPA, and the appellate court determined on
interlocutory appeal by the government that the classified discovery was not relevant to the
defense. Here, again, there is no classified discovery. Instead, the Special Counsel invokes
Yunis for the proposition that it can provide ex parte classified reasons to the court without any
CIPA proceeding about why the Defendant is not entitled to discovery of non-classified
discovery at all. Yunis said no such thing and cannot be extended to support any such argument.
Here, like everything else in this case, the Special Counsel has already unilaterally
determined that his proposal cannot possibly prejudice Concord. See Mot. at 3. But that is not
within the power of any prosecutor to decide. If the Court were to permit this unprecedented
conduct, it will be absolutely impossible for Concord to effectively challenge until appeal the
propriety of any resulting discovery order. That seems to be the Special Counsel’s plan despite
the fact that at a minimum it will have the appearance of impropriety, and in the worst case will
create the possibility of actual misconduct in leaving it to the Court alone to determine the
validity of the arguments provided by the Special Counsel absent any scrutiny by the Defendant.
That is not how criminal cases proceed in the United States.
Finally, it is worth noting that while undersigned counsel continues to work through the
millions of pages of allegedly sensitive discovery, they would be hard-pressed at this point to
identify any sensitive discovery that fits within the categories outlined by the Special Counsel in
his prior briefing regarding the protective order. See Gov’t Mot. for Protective Order at 6-8, Dkt.
24. In contrast, it seems as if the Special Counsel himself is ignorant of the information available to the general public of the collection techniques he used in this matter, as noted in
Concord’s Motion for Approval to Disclose Discovery Pursuant to Protective Order at 13-15,
Dkt. 77. Could the manner in which he collected a nude selfie really threaten the national
security of the United States?"


As you can see it's a JOKE.... Because thats what the Mueller investigation is A JOKE. Mueller is trying to claim all of the evidence is a national security concern... So he's refusing to provide the evidence... The lawyers are pointing out what a joke that is.. "Is it really a national security concern how he obtained a nude selfie?"

English comprehension is not your strong point, is it ? You posted I would say you read it wrong but I'm sure you didn't read it. I replied You would be wrong but that's par for the course with you

Then the other is true.. You intentionally didn't provide a link or quote to back up your FAKE NEWS claim

Mueller doesn't want to provide the evidence because the "national security concern" is that it wasn't Russians who were running this sham. It wasn't Trump either.. It was the same fucking people who just admitted to do the the same fucking thing in AL.. And Mueller's case is a complete fucking FRAUD/DECEPTION.

Hilarious if its true

It is true.. Mueller's investigation is a sham.

Im sorry you have difficulty using Google but anyway here you go.


A Russian company told a federal court Thursday that it believes that among the terabytes of data collected by special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is a nude selfie.

Concord Management and Catering -- without providing information on who is depicted in the nude selfie -- questions whether there could be national security concerns related to such a holding.
"Could the manner in which he collected a nude selfie really threaten the national security of the United States," Concord's lawyers ask in the filing.
Concord's filing Thursday comes amid a drawn-out fight where the Russian company seeks to access what the Justice Department says is "sensitive" evidence in the case, which could reveal national security and American investigative secrets to powerful foreigners.
The company is objecting to Mueller's request to share classified information with the judge that is kept secret and protected from Concord's lawyers' view.
Concord again argues that the special counsel has a "make-believe case" and says its opposition is "likely fruitless" but "object we must both for Concord and every other defendant to whom the Special Counsel believes the laws and rules of the United States no longer apply to his novel adventures."
Recently, Concord asked the judge to allow it to share information US investigators uncovered in the criminal case against the Russians social media scheme with a prominent Russian oligarch and others who perpetrated the alleged crime. So far, the judge has kept locked down as "sensitive "evidence in the case, because prosecutors fear unveiling details of their ongoing investigation and of their investigative tactics.
The company says it needs to share the evidence, which consists of terabytes of data showing a Russian operation to post political propaganda on social media to manipulate American voters, in order to prepare for trial.
One of the company's leaders is also indicted in the case but has not appeared in US court to enter a plea. Concord specifically asked to share the material with him, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who sometimes is referred to as Putin's chef. The company also asked to show some of the evidence to individuals who wrote them, because it is written in Russian, and they say Russian is a complicated enough language that it would be better to have it translated by the people who wrote the words.
Concord has pleaded not guilty to a conspiracy charge related to the social media scheme. Thirteen other individuals and 2 additional companies are also charged in the alleged crime.
Mueller responded to the request Concord made on December 21, saying that to make their argument, they'd like to submit classified material to the judge that's both kept secret and protected from Concord's lawyers' view. They especially oppose Prigozhin from seeing the discovery.
Concord's lawyers and the special counsel's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

I don't need to read someone else's SPIN of the filing when I read the actual filing as well as posted it in this thread.. The fact that you posted that nonsense and COMPLETELY ignored the actual filing and quote from it that I posted just goes to show that you only want to see and hear what you want to see and hear. Why didn't CNN link to the filing? The same reason YOU didn't. Because it's SPIN

Mueller got BEAT DOWN in that filing...

https://images.axios.com/Wd1cXMA-PiA...4906036834.png

They need to add that Russian chick that was conspiring with the NRA

As I said a sham... Not one of those convictions have anything to do with Trump. Except maybe a plea to a non-crime.


Irony alert: Firm that warned Americans of Russian bots...was running an army of fake Russian bots
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/447630-russ...new-knowledge/