Shouldn't Jeff Bezos and other BAZILLIONAIRES give more to charity?
 

Dude is worth $140B but only a smidgen of that went to charity https://nypost.com/2019/01/26/jeff-b...ne-to-charity/

Do UBER Rich (not the typical middle class American with a $1M home value) owe society more in the form of charitable giving?

I would say middle class is more like 300k home value in most states (which would look like a million in others).

But I'm with ya.. you wonder why every single one of these guys isn't trying to save the world with a unified strategy.

After you know that you've got enough money to last you ten lifetimes, it should be common sense.. Then again, they probably value POWER more than charity.

It's their money let them do what they want with it :2 cents:

Why the fuck would they even want to when we have a cunt in charge of the country who docent even believe in global warming ?

Unless you're personally overseeing every aspect of the distribution of charity funds, too many of these "charities" these days soak up a disproportionate percent with "admin" expenses.

I can't blame people who are disenfranchised with most (not all, but most) charities these days. Sadly its become a lucrative endeavour to run a charity.

That's exactly why Bill Gates started up his own charities.

I agree.

Who is to say they should give more.

As a percentage they might not but as a dollar amount the probably give more than almost everyone else.

What will giving to charity do? Make people dependent on handouts!!!

Want money? Get out there an do something for society. :321GFY

nobody has explained the benefits of hoarding money so far....not one single argument has been presented...if I was to say "only a few people will control most of the worlds drinking water" it would sound like a fucking scandal..."they use more water" is not a valid argument...

money is the means of production in a modern economy...when a few people control the money this is communism...in a truly democratic society there is great equality and a few people can never control the entire government and economy without the express approval of the rest...

who says anyone should give to charity?

And half the time, you don´t realise how much most of the rich and famous are giving, even if it´s time to charity work and not money...

Wouldn´t it be better if there was no more war, ANYWHERE, and all the defence money from every country went to charities?????===== good times :)


The government could pay that soldier to give a disabled guy in a chair a day out climbing a mountain & get paid for it rather than shooting an IS & a nurse could be caring for someone alone in their home than a guy dying on the battlefield!

If all groups and governments come together, i´m sure even radicalists would agree money better spent :2 cents:

Would be nice if Amazon started paying tax first.

Indeed, he set up a fake charity which he uses to help out his investments

fuck no! Should rich people give back? yes, but how they feel comfortable doing so. No one should be forced to give more money back cause they worked harder and made more.

That is rewarding the poor and those too lazy to get a job.

we are talking about people who have more than 50million$...nobody is advocating taking money from the rich but the super rich...

it doesn't matter. Nobody should be forced to give more money other than paying taxes. The man got super rich by working harder/smarter than other people. If super-rich people were forced to give more then rich people would stop trying to bring that next big thing cause that might put him in that super-rich area.

The only people he should be giving more to is his employees.

this...

respect those who help you get there :thumbsup

so using the same logic it is OK to hoard drinking water? the owner worked harder than others etc...also please explain "the next big thing"...what billionaire gave us "the next big thing"?....

your argument basically boils down to:"they worked very very hard so it is OK that they have all our drinking water, fuck us, we should all roll over and die?"

you have not presented a valid argument for hoarding...I have presented many valid ones against...

he should give 95%

No, I only want people like you to roll over and die if you think the super-rich should give you handouts. I'm willing to work for what money/water I get.

*goes to the fridge to get a bottle of water and sees a full case. Guess I'm not dying today..

no you simply have no argument and you are trying to deflect with unrelated bullshit like my supposed financial status...you are completely wrong on both counts...

now you either have a great reason why hoarding money is good or you do not know what you are talking about...

why ? becuase they worked hard and smart ?

thats not good idea.

ppl want to rich/superrich then they have to work for it., nobody is stopping poor people to start another amazon..

but poor ppl are used to free stuff and they expect more and more .,

Who here like Elizabeth Warren's plan better?

He's already losing 50%.

My guess is he'll be losing more after the divorce...

Which plan? The one where she doesn't know how many branches of government? Or the teepee peace pipe plan?

They will get taxed heavily soon

I think its up to each person. I rarely give to any charity. I give $10.00 to Omaze once in a while. In the winter I'll buy a meal at McDonalds and give it to a homeless person. Just recently I donated to a homeless shelter, but honestly this is the first time in years that I've ever donated anything. Not everyone is the giving type.

They should donate more. A lot more.

I am fifty years old. If I had $140 billion in the bank, I could donate one billion dollars until I am as old as Baddog I would still have $10 billion.....

I do a lot of charity work after hours. Could you just imagine what one billion dollars would do for the homeless in San Francisco? Do you know how many lives you could change? My god....