![]() |
I guess it will now be ok to declare a national emergency to take guns away
Guns have killed far more people in this country than illegals have. I supposed the next national emergency will be to take everyone's guns..
Republicans are the dumbest of the dumb. They are too busy yelling at people to get off their lawn that they routinely walk right into to poles.. |
What demographic makes up most of the gun homicides?
|
Quote:
|
You know the alt right will have their confederate panties in a bunch when the next democratic president does the same thing as Chump!
|
A national emergency declaring Republicans as traitors is what's needed.
|
The big problem with that line of thinking is that guns are a constitutional right.
Any attempt at a national emergency to take guns would not only trigger a massive revolt, but also the Supreme Court would immediately strike it down. Also...there are currently THIRTY "national emergencies" still in use as we speak by former Presidents. So far that did not even cause a whimper from the media and nobody tried to use a national emergency to take guns. Presidents have done this dozens of times over the years. Only with Trump is there an uproar from the Democrat politicians, the media, and of course the low-information crowd. |
Quote:
The kind of guns we have now are not the same as the single shot muskets in 1787 ( that's when the Constitution was created ) Kids with machine guns is not a constitutional right. Common sense gun ownership will solve a lot of our problems. |
Robbie believes the wall is already halfway built. Next Trump will tell him Hillary is locked up and he'll believe that too.
|
that's fake as hell
|
Quote:
Just educating you on the American Constitution and how it is amended. :1orglaugh |
I don't think it'll happen, but guns kill more people in America than Mexicans do. So it'll be an easier case. Especially if the good ol boys keep mass shooting and suiciding themselves into minority status.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure you can keep "1" single chamber rifle per household. The rest can be outlawed legally. Did you forget already that Trump banned bump stocks? Trump set that precedent by signing a EO to ban a piece of gun. The next guy could sign a EO banning the lower receiver of semi automatic rifles or pistols or mags & clips that hold more than 1 bullet. (Why do you think all the gun nutters were outraged about Trump doing that or did Fox news not tell you about it?) All you Republicans are too busy yelling at people walking on your lawn that you don't watch where you are walking.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pretty sure that you really didn't say much to me there. But okay! :) This is a discussion of Pres. Trump using a "national emergency" Executive Order (as other Presidents have done dozens of times) to get funding. Some Democrat politicians have declared (wrongly), that a future Democrat President could use such an Executive Order to take away guns from citizens. My reply was that it would indeed cause an uprising in this country AND the Supreme Court would immediately rule it unconstitutional. As I have said COUNTLESS times right here on GFY... IF the citizens of the United States feel we should be disarmed by the govt., the CONGRESS needs to start the procedure in place in our Constitution to repeal the 2nd Amendment. They had no hesitation in adding the 16th amendment about a hundred years ago to make it constitutional to take our money via Income Tax (something the Founding Fathers didn't want). They also had no problems repealing and adding other amendments in the 20th century. So IF anyone in the United States wants to be disarmed by their govt., it's pretty simple: Vote for Congressmen and Senators who will repeal the 2nd Amendment. |
Most gun deaths are suicides, moron. The opioid crisis is killing far more people. Moron. The left are such authoritarian fascists. How bout you fuck off to North Korea, all of you.
|
Quote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...ntly-in-effect it's true, 31 are still in effect. Though none of them is about something like the wall which Trump didn't get funded even when he had both congress and senate. And I don't think they are meant for purposes like that either. Actually none of them - the 9/11 one aside - is even noteworthy for the public. And most people very likely never heard of them. The topic, the reasoning behind it and the fact that Trump can't even get his own party fully behind it and he has to resort to this, makes it a lot more newsworthy than the other 31. And can we really call people "low information crowd" when they dont know about Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why not just get rid of all military style weapons except for those in the Armed Forces & Police / Swat ?
|
Quote:
Trump's is the only one that's ever been directed at the domestic United States and to be used to steal people's rightful property. (aka their land as Trump can not build his wall with out taking people's property) This is what you are arguing in favor of, stealing people's land who do not want to sell it. Wasn't it also you complaining while Obama was in office that the BLM was taking ranchers land, now you support stealing rancher's land. because it's different now because "Republican" is doing it. I remember you ranting and raving about Obama somehow being at blame because of the BLM/Bundy ordeal. Where a rancher had set multiple fires once almost getting firemen killed, then acting like a terrorist on federally owned land.. Yet now you are ok when Trump wants to steal people's land.. Amazing how you change your convictions by whoever wins an election.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Paul Ryan was the Speaker Of The House. He is the reason that nothing was done. Hell, he didn't do a lot of anything as Speaker except the tax bill. Just because a party has both houses of Congress doesn't mean that they can do things...ESPECIALLY when the entire Republican Party hated Trump (remember? Trump called them all "puppets" of the Koch Brothers). Trump did a hostile take-over of the Republican Party. And I'm glad he did. And yes...you are VERY low-information on my country. Not your fault. Your being fed bullshit by the mainstream media. |
Quote:
Remember? (of course you don't)...Pres. Obama said this: "If Congress won't act...I will" And when Congress wouldn 't pass things he said: "I have a pen, and a phone". Educate yourself...or better yet, just don't make comments on shit you don't know. P.S.: The media APPLAUDED Pres. Obama for going usurping Congress to get what he wanted. Weird how now they are attacking Pres. Trump. But of course you don't see it that way because you are blinded by hate. |
Quote:
Now that Trump is POTUS, suddenly the reason he can't get anything done is because of Republicans in Congress. Robbie used to claim a good leader could negotiate and get things done even if those running Congress were unwilling. Suddenly now it's not bad leadership, but Paul Ryan & Mitch McConnell who are to blame. So does this mean Robbie will now change his mind and say it was not Obama's fault but rather Republican in Congress that nothing got done? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Robbie lives in lala land a fantasy land which he makes up on the fly.. Is Robbie the biggest hypocrite on GFY? I honestly think so. |
Quote:
man, I miss the times when Obamas tan suit made the Fox headlines :upsidedow |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He was very arrogant about it. That was a mistake and bad leadership. Trump HAS reached out over and over. Invited the Democrats to the White House over and over. But the Democrats have stuck to their tired "resist" mantra and refuse to work with him at all. THAT is poor leadership by the Democrat politicians. |
In fact I will prove that Robbie used to blame Obama for Congress doing nothing..
GFY search sucks ass but I found a post where he blamed Obama for being a poor leader because he couldn't get Congress to do anything.. GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Clinton favorability hits 7-year low Quote:
Funny how I nailed it... in 2014 while Robbie is still making excuses 5 years later.. GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - I thought Democrats were a "sure win" Quote:
I guess we are at least making some progress with Robbie. It took 5 years, but at least he now understands the reason Congress was gridlocked all that time, was because Republicans were in charge.. At least now the House is actually getting stuff done, but sadly Senate is still gridlocked.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants...xecutive-order However, we can with an Amendment. We've done it before. https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution |
Quote:
McConnell's own staffers said he would pretend to be busy as excuse to not meet with Obama.. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-busy-to-avoid https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/...snubbed-obama/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ancy/80801866/ https://mic.com/articles/22662/5-way...ted#.w3T9gweFo You are completely out of touch with reality.. I wanted to actually post the last link to show the many ways Obama tried to work with Republicans in Congress but they rejected it. Maybe Robbie will start to get a grasp on reality and not what he is spoon fed on Fox news.. To President Obama’s critics, he will never bring about the era of bipartisan cooperation that he campaigned on in 2008, but the facts prove otherwise. The president’s nomination of conservative Republican Chuck Hagel to his cabinet is just another example in a long line of Obama’s attempts to reach across the aisle and work with a recalcitrant Republican minority. Here are a few other gems, as we highlight some of Obama’s most bipartisan gestures of his first term and the Republican response. 1) Keeping Robert Gates as secretary of defense In January, 2009: Obama is inaugurated and immediately seeks out Republican lawmakers willing to work with his new agenda. He makes it a point to maintain Robert Gates (previously appointed by Republican President George W. Bush) as his Secretary of Defense. Some Republicans on the Hill even whisper that Obama was working with them more than Bush ever did. Republican response in January, 2009: Rush Limbaugh welcomes the president with a hearty “I hope he fails." 2) Obama meets with pro-choice and pro-life advocates In May, 2009: Obama begins the first of several sessions meeting with pro-choice advocates and their detractors in order to help design legislation that protects both the lives of women and the unborn. Republican response in September, 2009: South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson shouts “You lie!” at the president during Obama’s speech to Congress wherein he intended to reach out to Republicans and voice his concerns with our failing healthcare system and his plans to fix it. To make matters worse, fact checkers have disproved Wilson’s claim, saying that the healthcare proposal explicitly does not provide for illegal immigrants. 3) Obama listens to Republicans on health care In January, 2010: Obama holds a meeting with Republicans in Baltimore, where he allows for a candid question-and-answer session in order to hear directly from the opposition and allow them to express their skepticism. A month later, he speaks with Republicans in what will be dubbed the “Healthcare Summit.” Obama compromised his initial plan for a single-payer system, instead seeking a Republican-promoted individual mandate mirroring the one Mitt Romney created as Governor of Massachusetts in the 1990s. Republican response in October, 2010: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell states that the most important objective of the Republican Party is to make Obama a one-term president, not fixing our budget/debt issues, our broken healthcare, education or immigration systems, and certainly not protecting U.S. citizens from terrorist attacks. 4) Obama compromises on 2010 budget deal In December, 2010: Obama compromises on his previously-stated goal of not prolonging the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy by agreeing to a budget deal. By doing so, Obama provides for the continuation of unemployment benefits to the needy, establishes a payroll tax holiday, renews the inheritance tax, and ensures that the government continues paying its debts. Republican response by Spring of 2012: Senate Republicans have blocked Obama’s judicial nominees at an unprecedented rate, delaying their being placed on the bench by greater than four times more than Democrats ever did to Bush judicial nominees. 5) Obama compromises on "fiscal cliff" On January 1st, 2013: Obama once-again compromises on a “fiscal cliff” deal by raising the threshold of the income level for whom taxes would rise from $250,000 to $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for families and pushing back sequestration of funds allocated to the military. His deal-making resulted in the Federal government receiving even less revenues than Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner had previously offered to allow. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trump can't use this "emergency declaration" to steal money from states to recover from fire destruction, hurricanes and fliods. He's trying and he'll fail, yet again. |
Looks like we will have to declare a national emergency.. another mass shooting just happened..
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/act...ois/index.html What are the odds it's a deranged Trump nutter pissed off at Trump signing the budget.. |
Quote:
Think about it before you reply. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/791689890 https://www.gunbroker.com/item/794791298 https://www.gunbroker.com/item/799913775 https://www.gunbroker.com/item/797909592 https://www.gunbroker.com/item/795273404 |
Quote:
Yet American children are being killed in the own schools, and our government is doing nothing about? In Texas last week five people were executed, and it barely registered on the news. |
Quote:
Murders committed by illegals is a million times worse than those committed by fellow americans in the eyes of the alt right! When he was talking about the "Angel Moms" I thought it was a big fuck you to the parents of children killed in mass school shootings |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So... By your logic... the next political candidate can make a campaign promise - healthcare, gun control, free schooling - and then when they can't get it passed through Congress they can just declare a national emergency and pass it anyhow? No. That's not how it works. We don't create fake emergencies to keep campaign promises. Ever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
GFY has turned into Trumps Anonymous, with the MSM issuing you your very own "12 step" rule book. Prisoners. |
Quote:
So now you attack all border land owners as wanting to allow illegals in the country. You are so fucked in the head cum is dripping out of your nose! |
Bruh, Robbie wants to know how the Obama's can afford to live in nice neighborhood. He wants them investigated for that. True story.
Why TF are y'all trying to talk sense into that dude? |
Quote:
|
He's way gone. He has a right to be as stupid as he wants tho.
#MAGA |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123